Cargando…

Evaluation of LHP(® )(1% hydrogen peroxide) cream versus petrolatum and untreated controls in open wounds in healthy horses: a randomized, blinded control study

BACKGROUND: Treatment and protection of wounds in horses can be challenging; protecting bandages may be difficult to apply on the proximal extremities and the body. Unprotected wounds carry an increased risk of bacterial contamination and subsequent infection which can lead to delayed wound healing....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tóth, Tamás, Broström, Hans, Båverud, Viveca, Emanuelson, Ulf, Bagge, Elisabeth, Karlsson, Tommy, Bergvall, Kerstin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3148982/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21718487
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1751-0147-53-45
_version_ 1782209398305718272
author Tóth, Tamás
Broström, Hans
Båverud, Viveca
Emanuelson, Ulf
Bagge, Elisabeth
Karlsson, Tommy
Bergvall, Kerstin
author_facet Tóth, Tamás
Broström, Hans
Båverud, Viveca
Emanuelson, Ulf
Bagge, Elisabeth
Karlsson, Tommy
Bergvall, Kerstin
author_sort Tóth, Tamás
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Treatment and protection of wounds in horses can be challenging; protecting bandages may be difficult to apply on the proximal extremities and the body. Unprotected wounds carry an increased risk of bacterial contamination and subsequent infection which can lead to delayed wound healing. Topical treatment with antimicrobials is one possibility to prevent bacterial colonization or infection, but the frequent use of antimicrobials ultimately leads to development of bacterial resistance which is an increasing concern in both human and veterinary medicine. METHODS: Standardized wounds were created in 10 Standardbred mares. Three wounds were made in each horse. Two wounds were randomly treated with LHP(® )or petrolatum and the third wound served as untreated control. All wounds were assessed daily until complete epithelization. Protocol data were recorded on day 2, 6, 11, 16, 21 and 28. Data included clinical scores for inflammation and healing, photoplanimetry for calculating wound areas and swab cytology to assess bacterial colonization and inflammation. Bacterial cultures were obtained on day 2, 6 and 16. RESULTS: Mean time to complete healing for LHP(® )treated wounds was 32 days (95%CI = 26.9-37.7). Mean time to complete healing for petrolatum and untreated control wounds were 41.6 days (95%CI = 36.2-47.0) and 44.0 days (95%CI = 38.6-49.4) respectively. Wound healing occurred significantly faster in LHP(® )wounds compared to both petrolatum (p = 0.0004) and untreated controls (p < 0.0001). There was no significant difference in time for healing between petrolatum and untreated controls. Total scores for bacteria and neutrophils were significantly (p < 0.0001) lower for LHP(® )treated wounds compared to petrolatum from day 16 and onwards. Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus zooepidemicus were only found in cultures from petrolatum treated wounds and untreated controls. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with LHP(® )reduced bacterial colonization and was associated with earlier complete wound healing. LHP(® )cream appears to be safe and effective for topical wound treatment or wound protection.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3148982
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31489822011-08-03 Evaluation of LHP(® )(1% hydrogen peroxide) cream versus petrolatum and untreated controls in open wounds in healthy horses: a randomized, blinded control study Tóth, Tamás Broström, Hans Båverud, Viveca Emanuelson, Ulf Bagge, Elisabeth Karlsson, Tommy Bergvall, Kerstin Acta Vet Scand Research BACKGROUND: Treatment and protection of wounds in horses can be challenging; protecting bandages may be difficult to apply on the proximal extremities and the body. Unprotected wounds carry an increased risk of bacterial contamination and subsequent infection which can lead to delayed wound healing. Topical treatment with antimicrobials is one possibility to prevent bacterial colonization or infection, but the frequent use of antimicrobials ultimately leads to development of bacterial resistance which is an increasing concern in both human and veterinary medicine. METHODS: Standardized wounds were created in 10 Standardbred mares. Three wounds were made in each horse. Two wounds were randomly treated with LHP(® )or petrolatum and the third wound served as untreated control. All wounds were assessed daily until complete epithelization. Protocol data were recorded on day 2, 6, 11, 16, 21 and 28. Data included clinical scores for inflammation and healing, photoplanimetry for calculating wound areas and swab cytology to assess bacterial colonization and inflammation. Bacterial cultures were obtained on day 2, 6 and 16. RESULTS: Mean time to complete healing for LHP(® )treated wounds was 32 days (95%CI = 26.9-37.7). Mean time to complete healing for petrolatum and untreated control wounds were 41.6 days (95%CI = 36.2-47.0) and 44.0 days (95%CI = 38.6-49.4) respectively. Wound healing occurred significantly faster in LHP(® )wounds compared to both petrolatum (p = 0.0004) and untreated controls (p < 0.0001). There was no significant difference in time for healing between petrolatum and untreated controls. Total scores for bacteria and neutrophils were significantly (p < 0.0001) lower for LHP(® )treated wounds compared to petrolatum from day 16 and onwards. Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus zooepidemicus were only found in cultures from petrolatum treated wounds and untreated controls. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with LHP(® )reduced bacterial colonization and was associated with earlier complete wound healing. LHP(® )cream appears to be safe and effective for topical wound treatment or wound protection. BioMed Central 2011-06-30 /pmc/articles/PMC3148982/ /pubmed/21718487 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1751-0147-53-45 Text en Copyright ©2011 Tóth et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Tóth, Tamás
Broström, Hans
Båverud, Viveca
Emanuelson, Ulf
Bagge, Elisabeth
Karlsson, Tommy
Bergvall, Kerstin
Evaluation of LHP(® )(1% hydrogen peroxide) cream versus petrolatum and untreated controls in open wounds in healthy horses: a randomized, blinded control study
title Evaluation of LHP(® )(1% hydrogen peroxide) cream versus petrolatum and untreated controls in open wounds in healthy horses: a randomized, blinded control study
title_full Evaluation of LHP(® )(1% hydrogen peroxide) cream versus petrolatum and untreated controls in open wounds in healthy horses: a randomized, blinded control study
title_fullStr Evaluation of LHP(® )(1% hydrogen peroxide) cream versus petrolatum and untreated controls in open wounds in healthy horses: a randomized, blinded control study
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of LHP(® )(1% hydrogen peroxide) cream versus petrolatum and untreated controls in open wounds in healthy horses: a randomized, blinded control study
title_short Evaluation of LHP(® )(1% hydrogen peroxide) cream versus petrolatum and untreated controls in open wounds in healthy horses: a randomized, blinded control study
title_sort evaluation of lhp(® )(1% hydrogen peroxide) cream versus petrolatum and untreated controls in open wounds in healthy horses: a randomized, blinded control study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3148982/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21718487
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1751-0147-53-45
work_keys_str_mv AT tothtamas evaluationoflhp1hydrogenperoxidecreamversuspetrolatumanduntreatedcontrolsinopenwoundsinhealthyhorsesarandomizedblindedcontrolstudy
AT brostromhans evaluationoflhp1hydrogenperoxidecreamversuspetrolatumanduntreatedcontrolsinopenwoundsinhealthyhorsesarandomizedblindedcontrolstudy
AT baverudviveca evaluationoflhp1hydrogenperoxidecreamversuspetrolatumanduntreatedcontrolsinopenwoundsinhealthyhorsesarandomizedblindedcontrolstudy
AT emanuelsonulf evaluationoflhp1hydrogenperoxidecreamversuspetrolatumanduntreatedcontrolsinopenwoundsinhealthyhorsesarandomizedblindedcontrolstudy
AT baggeelisabeth evaluationoflhp1hydrogenperoxidecreamversuspetrolatumanduntreatedcontrolsinopenwoundsinhealthyhorsesarandomizedblindedcontrolstudy
AT karlssontommy evaluationoflhp1hydrogenperoxidecreamversuspetrolatumanduntreatedcontrolsinopenwoundsinhealthyhorsesarandomizedblindedcontrolstudy
AT bergvallkerstin evaluationoflhp1hydrogenperoxidecreamversuspetrolatumanduntreatedcontrolsinopenwoundsinhealthyhorsesarandomizedblindedcontrolstudy