Cargando…

Comparisons of Two Proteomic Analyses of Non-Mucoid and Mucoid Pseudomonas aeruginosa Clinical Isolates from a Cystic Fibrosis Patient

Pseudomonas aeruginosa chronically infects the lungs of cystic fibrosis (CF) patients. The conditions in the CF lung appear to select for P. aeruginosa with advantageous phenotypes for chronic infection. However, the mechanisms that allow the establishment of this chronic infection have not been ful...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rao, Jayasimha, Damron, F. Heath, Basler, Marek, DiGiandomenico, Antonio, Sherman, Nicholas E., Fox, Jay W., Mekalanos, John J., Goldberg, Joanna B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Research Foundation 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3149151/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21863142
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2011.00162
_version_ 1782209430953132032
author Rao, Jayasimha
Damron, F. Heath
Basler, Marek
DiGiandomenico, Antonio
Sherman, Nicholas E.
Fox, Jay W.
Mekalanos, John J.
Goldberg, Joanna B.
author_facet Rao, Jayasimha
Damron, F. Heath
Basler, Marek
DiGiandomenico, Antonio
Sherman, Nicholas E.
Fox, Jay W.
Mekalanos, John J.
Goldberg, Joanna B.
author_sort Rao, Jayasimha
collection PubMed
description Pseudomonas aeruginosa chronically infects the lungs of cystic fibrosis (CF) patients. The conditions in the CF lung appear to select for P. aeruginosa with advantageous phenotypes for chronic infection. However, the mechanisms that allow the establishment of this chronic infection have not been fully characterized. We have previously reported the transcriptional analysis of two CF isolates strains 383 and 2192. Strain 2192 is a mucoid, alginate overproducing strain whereas strain 383 is non-mucoid. Mucoid strains are associated with chronic infection of the CF lung and non-mucoid strains are the typical initially infecting isolates. To elucidate novel differences between these two strains, we employed two methods of shotgun proteomics: isobaric tags for relative and absolute quantitation (iTRAQ) and two-dimensional gel electrophoresis (2-DE). iTRAQ compares the amount of protein between samples and relies on protein abundance, while 2-DE gel electrophoresis depends on selection of separated protein spots. For both these methods, mass spectrometry was then used to identify proteins differentially expressed between the two strains. The compilation of these two proteomic methods along with Western blot analysis revealed proteins of the HSI-I operon of the type 6 secretion system, showed increased expression in 383 compared to 2192, confirming the our previous transcriptional analysis. Proteomic analysis of other proteins did not fully correlate with the transcriptome but other differentially expressed proteins are discussed. Also, differences were noted between the results obtained for the two proteomic techniques. These shotgun proteomic analyses identified proteins that had been predicted only through gene identification; we now refer to these as “proteins of unknown functions” since their existence has now been established however their functional characterization remains to be elucidated.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3149151
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Frontiers Research Foundation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31491512011-08-23 Comparisons of Two Proteomic Analyses of Non-Mucoid and Mucoid Pseudomonas aeruginosa Clinical Isolates from a Cystic Fibrosis Patient Rao, Jayasimha Damron, F. Heath Basler, Marek DiGiandomenico, Antonio Sherman, Nicholas E. Fox, Jay W. Mekalanos, John J. Goldberg, Joanna B. Front Microbiol Microbiology Pseudomonas aeruginosa chronically infects the lungs of cystic fibrosis (CF) patients. The conditions in the CF lung appear to select for P. aeruginosa with advantageous phenotypes for chronic infection. However, the mechanisms that allow the establishment of this chronic infection have not been fully characterized. We have previously reported the transcriptional analysis of two CF isolates strains 383 and 2192. Strain 2192 is a mucoid, alginate overproducing strain whereas strain 383 is non-mucoid. Mucoid strains are associated with chronic infection of the CF lung and non-mucoid strains are the typical initially infecting isolates. To elucidate novel differences between these two strains, we employed two methods of shotgun proteomics: isobaric tags for relative and absolute quantitation (iTRAQ) and two-dimensional gel electrophoresis (2-DE). iTRAQ compares the amount of protein between samples and relies on protein abundance, while 2-DE gel electrophoresis depends on selection of separated protein spots. For both these methods, mass spectrometry was then used to identify proteins differentially expressed between the two strains. The compilation of these two proteomic methods along with Western blot analysis revealed proteins of the HSI-I operon of the type 6 secretion system, showed increased expression in 383 compared to 2192, confirming the our previous transcriptional analysis. Proteomic analysis of other proteins did not fully correlate with the transcriptome but other differentially expressed proteins are discussed. Also, differences were noted between the results obtained for the two proteomic techniques. These shotgun proteomic analyses identified proteins that had been predicted only through gene identification; we now refer to these as “proteins of unknown functions” since their existence has now been established however their functional characterization remains to be elucidated. Frontiers Research Foundation 2011-08-01 /pmc/articles/PMC3149151/ /pubmed/21863142 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2011.00162 Text en Copyright © 2011 Rao, Damron, Basler, DiGiandomenico, Sherman, Fox, Mekalanos and Goldberg. http://www.frontiersin.org/licenseagreement This is an open-access article subject to a non-exclusive license between the authors and Frontiers Media SA, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in other forums, provided the original authors and source are credited and other Frontiers conditions are complied with.
spellingShingle Microbiology
Rao, Jayasimha
Damron, F. Heath
Basler, Marek
DiGiandomenico, Antonio
Sherman, Nicholas E.
Fox, Jay W.
Mekalanos, John J.
Goldberg, Joanna B.
Comparisons of Two Proteomic Analyses of Non-Mucoid and Mucoid Pseudomonas aeruginosa Clinical Isolates from a Cystic Fibrosis Patient
title Comparisons of Two Proteomic Analyses of Non-Mucoid and Mucoid Pseudomonas aeruginosa Clinical Isolates from a Cystic Fibrosis Patient
title_full Comparisons of Two Proteomic Analyses of Non-Mucoid and Mucoid Pseudomonas aeruginosa Clinical Isolates from a Cystic Fibrosis Patient
title_fullStr Comparisons of Two Proteomic Analyses of Non-Mucoid and Mucoid Pseudomonas aeruginosa Clinical Isolates from a Cystic Fibrosis Patient
title_full_unstemmed Comparisons of Two Proteomic Analyses of Non-Mucoid and Mucoid Pseudomonas aeruginosa Clinical Isolates from a Cystic Fibrosis Patient
title_short Comparisons of Two Proteomic Analyses of Non-Mucoid and Mucoid Pseudomonas aeruginosa Clinical Isolates from a Cystic Fibrosis Patient
title_sort comparisons of two proteomic analyses of non-mucoid and mucoid pseudomonas aeruginosa clinical isolates from a cystic fibrosis patient
topic Microbiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3149151/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21863142
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2011.00162
work_keys_str_mv AT raojayasimha comparisonsoftwoproteomicanalysesofnonmucoidandmucoidpseudomonasaeruginosaclinicalisolatesfromacysticfibrosispatient
AT damronfheath comparisonsoftwoproteomicanalysesofnonmucoidandmucoidpseudomonasaeruginosaclinicalisolatesfromacysticfibrosispatient
AT baslermarek comparisonsoftwoproteomicanalysesofnonmucoidandmucoidpseudomonasaeruginosaclinicalisolatesfromacysticfibrosispatient
AT digiandomenicoantonio comparisonsoftwoproteomicanalysesofnonmucoidandmucoidpseudomonasaeruginosaclinicalisolatesfromacysticfibrosispatient
AT shermannicholase comparisonsoftwoproteomicanalysesofnonmucoidandmucoidpseudomonasaeruginosaclinicalisolatesfromacysticfibrosispatient
AT foxjayw comparisonsoftwoproteomicanalysesofnonmucoidandmucoidpseudomonasaeruginosaclinicalisolatesfromacysticfibrosispatient
AT mekalanosjohnj comparisonsoftwoproteomicanalysesofnonmucoidandmucoidpseudomonasaeruginosaclinicalisolatesfromacysticfibrosispatient
AT goldbergjoannab comparisonsoftwoproteomicanalysesofnonmucoidandmucoidpseudomonasaeruginosaclinicalisolatesfromacysticfibrosispatient