Cargando…

Doppler velocity detection limitations in spectrometer-based versus swept-source optical coherence tomography

Recent advances in Doppler techniques have enabled high sensitivity imaging of biological flow to measure blood velocities and vascular perfusion. Here we compare spectrometer-based and wavelength-swept Doppler OCT implementations theoretically and experimentally, characterizing the lower and upper...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hendargo, Hansford C., McNabb, Ryan P., Dhalla, Al-Hafeez, Shepherd, Neal, Izatt, Joseph A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Optical Society of America 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3149517/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21833356
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/BOE.2.002175
_version_ 1782209455658631168
author Hendargo, Hansford C.
McNabb, Ryan P.
Dhalla, Al-Hafeez
Shepherd, Neal
Izatt, Joseph A.
author_facet Hendargo, Hansford C.
McNabb, Ryan P.
Dhalla, Al-Hafeez
Shepherd, Neal
Izatt, Joseph A.
author_sort Hendargo, Hansford C.
collection PubMed
description Recent advances in Doppler techniques have enabled high sensitivity imaging of biological flow to measure blood velocities and vascular perfusion. Here we compare spectrometer-based and wavelength-swept Doppler OCT implementations theoretically and experimentally, characterizing the lower and upper observable velocity limits in each configuration. We specifically characterize the washout limit for Doppler OCT, the velocity at which signal degradation results in loss of flow information, which is valid for both quantitative and qualitative flow imaging techniques. We also clearly differentiate the washout effect from the separate phenomenon of phase wrapping. We demonstrate that the maximum detectable Doppler velocity is determined by the fringe washout limit and not phase wrapping. Both theory and experimental results from phantom flow data and retinal blood flow data demonstrate the superiority of the swept-source technique for imaging vessels with high flow rates.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3149517
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Optical Society of America
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31495172011-08-10 Doppler velocity detection limitations in spectrometer-based versus swept-source optical coherence tomography Hendargo, Hansford C. McNabb, Ryan P. Dhalla, Al-Hafeez Shepherd, Neal Izatt, Joseph A. Biomed Opt Express Optical Coherence Tomography Recent advances in Doppler techniques have enabled high sensitivity imaging of biological flow to measure blood velocities and vascular perfusion. Here we compare spectrometer-based and wavelength-swept Doppler OCT implementations theoretically and experimentally, characterizing the lower and upper observable velocity limits in each configuration. We specifically characterize the washout limit for Doppler OCT, the velocity at which signal degradation results in loss of flow information, which is valid for both quantitative and qualitative flow imaging techniques. We also clearly differentiate the washout effect from the separate phenomenon of phase wrapping. We demonstrate that the maximum detectable Doppler velocity is determined by the fringe washout limit and not phase wrapping. Both theory and experimental results from phantom flow data and retinal blood flow data demonstrate the superiority of the swept-source technique for imaging vessels with high flow rates. Optical Society of America 2011-07-06 /pmc/articles/PMC3149517/ /pubmed/21833356 http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/BOE.2.002175 Text en ©2011 Optical Society of America http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 Unported License, which permits download and redistribution, provided that the original work is properly cited. This license restricts the article from being modified or used commercially.
spellingShingle Optical Coherence Tomography
Hendargo, Hansford C.
McNabb, Ryan P.
Dhalla, Al-Hafeez
Shepherd, Neal
Izatt, Joseph A.
Doppler velocity detection limitations in spectrometer-based versus swept-source optical coherence tomography
title Doppler velocity detection limitations in spectrometer-based versus swept-source optical coherence tomography
title_full Doppler velocity detection limitations in spectrometer-based versus swept-source optical coherence tomography
title_fullStr Doppler velocity detection limitations in spectrometer-based versus swept-source optical coherence tomography
title_full_unstemmed Doppler velocity detection limitations in spectrometer-based versus swept-source optical coherence tomography
title_short Doppler velocity detection limitations in spectrometer-based versus swept-source optical coherence tomography
title_sort doppler velocity detection limitations in spectrometer-based versus swept-source optical coherence tomography
topic Optical Coherence Tomography
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3149517/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21833356
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/BOE.2.002175
work_keys_str_mv AT hendargohansfordc dopplervelocitydetectionlimitationsinspectrometerbasedversussweptsourceopticalcoherencetomography
AT mcnabbryanp dopplervelocitydetectionlimitationsinspectrometerbasedversussweptsourceopticalcoherencetomography
AT dhallaalhafeez dopplervelocitydetectionlimitationsinspectrometerbasedversussweptsourceopticalcoherencetomography
AT shepherdneal dopplervelocitydetectionlimitationsinspectrometerbasedversussweptsourceopticalcoherencetomography
AT izattjosepha dopplervelocitydetectionlimitationsinspectrometerbasedversussweptsourceopticalcoherencetomography