Cargando…
Doppler velocity detection limitations in spectrometer-based versus swept-source optical coherence tomography
Recent advances in Doppler techniques have enabled high sensitivity imaging of biological flow to measure blood velocities and vascular perfusion. Here we compare spectrometer-based and wavelength-swept Doppler OCT implementations theoretically and experimentally, characterizing the lower and upper...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Optical Society of America
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3149517/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21833356 http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/BOE.2.002175 |
_version_ | 1782209455658631168 |
---|---|
author | Hendargo, Hansford C. McNabb, Ryan P. Dhalla, Al-Hafeez Shepherd, Neal Izatt, Joseph A. |
author_facet | Hendargo, Hansford C. McNabb, Ryan P. Dhalla, Al-Hafeez Shepherd, Neal Izatt, Joseph A. |
author_sort | Hendargo, Hansford C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Recent advances in Doppler techniques have enabled high sensitivity imaging of biological flow to measure blood velocities and vascular perfusion. Here we compare spectrometer-based and wavelength-swept Doppler OCT implementations theoretically and experimentally, characterizing the lower and upper observable velocity limits in each configuration. We specifically characterize the washout limit for Doppler OCT, the velocity at which signal degradation results in loss of flow information, which is valid for both quantitative and qualitative flow imaging techniques. We also clearly differentiate the washout effect from the separate phenomenon of phase wrapping. We demonstrate that the maximum detectable Doppler velocity is determined by the fringe washout limit and not phase wrapping. Both theory and experimental results from phantom flow data and retinal blood flow data demonstrate the superiority of the swept-source technique for imaging vessels with high flow rates. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3149517 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | Optical Society of America |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-31495172011-08-10 Doppler velocity detection limitations in spectrometer-based versus swept-source optical coherence tomography Hendargo, Hansford C. McNabb, Ryan P. Dhalla, Al-Hafeez Shepherd, Neal Izatt, Joseph A. Biomed Opt Express Optical Coherence Tomography Recent advances in Doppler techniques have enabled high sensitivity imaging of biological flow to measure blood velocities and vascular perfusion. Here we compare spectrometer-based and wavelength-swept Doppler OCT implementations theoretically and experimentally, characterizing the lower and upper observable velocity limits in each configuration. We specifically characterize the washout limit for Doppler OCT, the velocity at which signal degradation results in loss of flow information, which is valid for both quantitative and qualitative flow imaging techniques. We also clearly differentiate the washout effect from the separate phenomenon of phase wrapping. We demonstrate that the maximum detectable Doppler velocity is determined by the fringe washout limit and not phase wrapping. Both theory and experimental results from phantom flow data and retinal blood flow data demonstrate the superiority of the swept-source technique for imaging vessels with high flow rates. Optical Society of America 2011-07-06 /pmc/articles/PMC3149517/ /pubmed/21833356 http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/BOE.2.002175 Text en ©2011 Optical Society of America http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 Unported License, which permits download and redistribution, provided that the original work is properly cited. This license restricts the article from being modified or used commercially. |
spellingShingle | Optical Coherence Tomography Hendargo, Hansford C. McNabb, Ryan P. Dhalla, Al-Hafeez Shepherd, Neal Izatt, Joseph A. Doppler velocity detection limitations in spectrometer-based versus swept-source optical coherence tomography |
title | Doppler velocity detection limitations in spectrometer-based versus swept-source optical coherence tomography |
title_full | Doppler velocity detection limitations in spectrometer-based versus swept-source optical coherence tomography |
title_fullStr | Doppler velocity detection limitations in spectrometer-based versus swept-source optical coherence tomography |
title_full_unstemmed | Doppler velocity detection limitations in spectrometer-based versus swept-source optical coherence tomography |
title_short | Doppler velocity detection limitations in spectrometer-based versus swept-source optical coherence tomography |
title_sort | doppler velocity detection limitations in spectrometer-based versus swept-source optical coherence tomography |
topic | Optical Coherence Tomography |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3149517/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21833356 http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/BOE.2.002175 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hendargohansfordc dopplervelocitydetectionlimitationsinspectrometerbasedversussweptsourceopticalcoherencetomography AT mcnabbryanp dopplervelocitydetectionlimitationsinspectrometerbasedversussweptsourceopticalcoherencetomography AT dhallaalhafeez dopplervelocitydetectionlimitationsinspectrometerbasedversussweptsourceopticalcoherencetomography AT shepherdneal dopplervelocitydetectionlimitationsinspectrometerbasedversussweptsourceopticalcoherencetomography AT izattjosepha dopplervelocitydetectionlimitationsinspectrometerbasedversussweptsourceopticalcoherencetomography |