Cargando…
Alternatives to animal testing: current status and future perspectives
On the occasion of the 20th anniversary of the Center for Alternative Methods to Animal Experiments (ZEBET), an international symposium was held at the German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR) in Berlin. At the same time, this symposium was meant to celebrate the 50th anniversary of the pu...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer-Verlag
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3149673/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21607681 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00204-011-0718-x |
_version_ | 1782209487028879360 |
---|---|
author | Liebsch, Manfred Grune, Barbara Seiler, Andrea Butzke, Daniel Oelgeschläger, Michael Pirow, Ralph Adler, Sarah Riebeling, Christian Luch, Andreas |
author_facet | Liebsch, Manfred Grune, Barbara Seiler, Andrea Butzke, Daniel Oelgeschläger, Michael Pirow, Ralph Adler, Sarah Riebeling, Christian Luch, Andreas |
author_sort | Liebsch, Manfred |
collection | PubMed |
description | On the occasion of the 20th anniversary of the Center for Alternative Methods to Animal Experiments (ZEBET), an international symposium was held at the German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR) in Berlin. At the same time, this symposium was meant to celebrate the 50th anniversary of the publication of the book “The Principles of Humane Experimental Technique” by Russell and Burch in 1959 in which the 3Rs principle (that is, Replacement, Reduction, and Refinement) has been coined and introduced to foster the development of alternative methods to animal testing. Another topic addressed by the symposium was the new vision on “Toxicology in the twenty-first Century”, as proposed by the US-National Research Council, which aims at using human cells and tissues for toxicity testing in vitro rather than live animals. An overview of the achievements and current tasks, as well as a vision of the future to be addressed by ZEBET@BfR in the years to come is outlined in the present paper. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3149673 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | Springer-Verlag |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-31496732011-09-08 Alternatives to animal testing: current status and future perspectives Liebsch, Manfred Grune, Barbara Seiler, Andrea Butzke, Daniel Oelgeschläger, Michael Pirow, Ralph Adler, Sarah Riebeling, Christian Luch, Andreas Arch Toxicol Editorial On the occasion of the 20th anniversary of the Center for Alternative Methods to Animal Experiments (ZEBET), an international symposium was held at the German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR) in Berlin. At the same time, this symposium was meant to celebrate the 50th anniversary of the publication of the book “The Principles of Humane Experimental Technique” by Russell and Burch in 1959 in which the 3Rs principle (that is, Replacement, Reduction, and Refinement) has been coined and introduced to foster the development of alternative methods to animal testing. Another topic addressed by the symposium was the new vision on “Toxicology in the twenty-first Century”, as proposed by the US-National Research Council, which aims at using human cells and tissues for toxicity testing in vitro rather than live animals. An overview of the achievements and current tasks, as well as a vision of the future to be addressed by ZEBET@BfR in the years to come is outlined in the present paper. Springer-Verlag 2011-05-24 2011 /pmc/articles/PMC3149673/ /pubmed/21607681 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00204-011-0718-x Text en © The Author(s) 2011 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Editorial Liebsch, Manfred Grune, Barbara Seiler, Andrea Butzke, Daniel Oelgeschläger, Michael Pirow, Ralph Adler, Sarah Riebeling, Christian Luch, Andreas Alternatives to animal testing: current status and future perspectives |
title | Alternatives to animal testing: current status and future perspectives |
title_full | Alternatives to animal testing: current status and future perspectives |
title_fullStr | Alternatives to animal testing: current status and future perspectives |
title_full_unstemmed | Alternatives to animal testing: current status and future perspectives |
title_short | Alternatives to animal testing: current status and future perspectives |
title_sort | alternatives to animal testing: current status and future perspectives |
topic | Editorial |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3149673/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21607681 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00204-011-0718-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liebschmanfred alternativestoanimaltestingcurrentstatusandfutureperspectives AT grunebarbara alternativestoanimaltestingcurrentstatusandfutureperspectives AT seilerandrea alternativestoanimaltestingcurrentstatusandfutureperspectives AT butzkedaniel alternativestoanimaltestingcurrentstatusandfutureperspectives AT oelgeschlagermichael alternativestoanimaltestingcurrentstatusandfutureperspectives AT pirowralph alternativestoanimaltestingcurrentstatusandfutureperspectives AT adlersarah alternativestoanimaltestingcurrentstatusandfutureperspectives AT riebelingchristian alternativestoanimaltestingcurrentstatusandfutureperspectives AT luchandreas alternativestoanimaltestingcurrentstatusandfutureperspectives |