Cargando…

Habitat-Mediated Facilitation and Counteracting Ecosystem Engineering Interactively Influence Ecosystem Responses to Disturbance

Recovery of an ecosystem following disturbance can be severely hampered or even shift altogether when a point disturbance exceeds a certain spatial threshold. Such scale-dependent dynamics may be caused by preemptive competition, but may also result from diminished self-facilitation due to weakened...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Eklöf, Johan S., van der Heide, Tjisse, Donadi, Serena, van der Zee, Els M., O'Hara, Robert, Eriksson, Britas Klemens
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3150396/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21829719
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0023229
_version_ 1782209543728529408
author Eklöf, Johan S.
van der Heide, Tjisse
Donadi, Serena
van der Zee, Els M.
O'Hara, Robert
Eriksson, Britas Klemens
author_facet Eklöf, Johan S.
van der Heide, Tjisse
Donadi, Serena
van der Zee, Els M.
O'Hara, Robert
Eriksson, Britas Klemens
author_sort Eklöf, Johan S.
collection PubMed
description Recovery of an ecosystem following disturbance can be severely hampered or even shift altogether when a point disturbance exceeds a certain spatial threshold. Such scale-dependent dynamics may be caused by preemptive competition, but may also result from diminished self-facilitation due to weakened ecosystem engineering. Moreover, disturbance can facilitate colonization by engineering species that alter abiotic conditions in ways that exacerbate stress on the original species. Consequently, establishment of such counteracting engineers might reduce the spatial threshold for the disturbance, by effectively slowing recovery and increasing the risk for ecosystem shifts to alternative states. We tested these predictions in an intertidal mudflat characterized by a two-state mosaic of hummocks (humps exposed during low tide) dominated by the sediment-stabilizing seagrass Zostera noltii) and hollows (low-tide waterlogged depressions dominated by the bioturbating lugworm Arenicola marina). In contrast to expectations, seagrass recolonized both natural and experimental clearings via lateral expansion and seemed unaffected by both clearing size and lugworm addition. Near the end of the growth season, however, an additional disturbance (most likely waterfowl grazing and/or strong hydrodynamics) selectively impacted recolonizing seagrass in the largest (1 m(2)) clearings (regardless of lugworm addition), and in those medium (0.25 m(2)) clearings where lugworms had been added nearly five months earlier. Further analyses showed that the risk for the disturbance increased with hollow size, with a threshold of 0.24 m(2). Hollows of that size were caused by seagrass removal alone in the largest clearings, and by a weaker seagrass removal effect exacerbated by lugworm bioturbation in the medium clearings. Consequently, a sufficiently large disturbance increased the vulnerability of recolonizing seagrass to additional disturbance by weakening seagrass engineering effects (sediment stabilization). Meanwhile, the counteracting ecosystem engineering (lugworm bioturbation) reduced that threshold size. Therefore, scale-dependent interactions between habitat-mediated facilitation, competition and disturbance seem to maintain the spatial two-state mosaic in this ecosystem.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3150396
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31503962011-08-09 Habitat-Mediated Facilitation and Counteracting Ecosystem Engineering Interactively Influence Ecosystem Responses to Disturbance Eklöf, Johan S. van der Heide, Tjisse Donadi, Serena van der Zee, Els M. O'Hara, Robert Eriksson, Britas Klemens PLoS One Research Article Recovery of an ecosystem following disturbance can be severely hampered or even shift altogether when a point disturbance exceeds a certain spatial threshold. Such scale-dependent dynamics may be caused by preemptive competition, but may also result from diminished self-facilitation due to weakened ecosystem engineering. Moreover, disturbance can facilitate colonization by engineering species that alter abiotic conditions in ways that exacerbate stress on the original species. Consequently, establishment of such counteracting engineers might reduce the spatial threshold for the disturbance, by effectively slowing recovery and increasing the risk for ecosystem shifts to alternative states. We tested these predictions in an intertidal mudflat characterized by a two-state mosaic of hummocks (humps exposed during low tide) dominated by the sediment-stabilizing seagrass Zostera noltii) and hollows (low-tide waterlogged depressions dominated by the bioturbating lugworm Arenicola marina). In contrast to expectations, seagrass recolonized both natural and experimental clearings via lateral expansion and seemed unaffected by both clearing size and lugworm addition. Near the end of the growth season, however, an additional disturbance (most likely waterfowl grazing and/or strong hydrodynamics) selectively impacted recolonizing seagrass in the largest (1 m(2)) clearings (regardless of lugworm addition), and in those medium (0.25 m(2)) clearings where lugworms had been added nearly five months earlier. Further analyses showed that the risk for the disturbance increased with hollow size, with a threshold of 0.24 m(2). Hollows of that size were caused by seagrass removal alone in the largest clearings, and by a weaker seagrass removal effect exacerbated by lugworm bioturbation in the medium clearings. Consequently, a sufficiently large disturbance increased the vulnerability of recolonizing seagrass to additional disturbance by weakening seagrass engineering effects (sediment stabilization). Meanwhile, the counteracting ecosystem engineering (lugworm bioturbation) reduced that threshold size. Therefore, scale-dependent interactions between habitat-mediated facilitation, competition and disturbance seem to maintain the spatial two-state mosaic in this ecosystem. Public Library of Science 2011-08-04 /pmc/articles/PMC3150396/ /pubmed/21829719 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0023229 Text en Eklöf et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Eklöf, Johan S.
van der Heide, Tjisse
Donadi, Serena
van der Zee, Els M.
O'Hara, Robert
Eriksson, Britas Klemens
Habitat-Mediated Facilitation and Counteracting Ecosystem Engineering Interactively Influence Ecosystem Responses to Disturbance
title Habitat-Mediated Facilitation and Counteracting Ecosystem Engineering Interactively Influence Ecosystem Responses to Disturbance
title_full Habitat-Mediated Facilitation and Counteracting Ecosystem Engineering Interactively Influence Ecosystem Responses to Disturbance
title_fullStr Habitat-Mediated Facilitation and Counteracting Ecosystem Engineering Interactively Influence Ecosystem Responses to Disturbance
title_full_unstemmed Habitat-Mediated Facilitation and Counteracting Ecosystem Engineering Interactively Influence Ecosystem Responses to Disturbance
title_short Habitat-Mediated Facilitation and Counteracting Ecosystem Engineering Interactively Influence Ecosystem Responses to Disturbance
title_sort habitat-mediated facilitation and counteracting ecosystem engineering interactively influence ecosystem responses to disturbance
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3150396/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21829719
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0023229
work_keys_str_mv AT eklofjohans habitatmediatedfacilitationandcounteractingecosystemengineeringinteractivelyinfluenceecosystemresponsestodisturbance
AT vanderheidetjisse habitatmediatedfacilitationandcounteractingecosystemengineeringinteractivelyinfluenceecosystemresponsestodisturbance
AT donadiserena habitatmediatedfacilitationandcounteractingecosystemengineeringinteractivelyinfluenceecosystemresponsestodisturbance
AT vanderzeeelsm habitatmediatedfacilitationandcounteractingecosystemengineeringinteractivelyinfluenceecosystemresponsestodisturbance
AT ohararobert habitatmediatedfacilitationandcounteractingecosystemengineeringinteractivelyinfluenceecosystemresponsestodisturbance
AT erikssonbritasklemens habitatmediatedfacilitationandcounteractingecosystemengineeringinteractivelyinfluenceecosystemresponsestodisturbance