Cargando…
Evaluation of admissions to the Major Incident Hospital based on a standardized protocol
INTRODUCTION: The Major Incident Hospital (MIH) is a unique facility strictly reserved to provide immediate large-scale emergency care for victims of disasters and major incidents. We evaluated the implemented organization to identify strengths and weaknesses, and provide knowledge essential for fur...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer-Verlag
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3150834/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21837255 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00068-010-0067-0 |
_version_ | 1782209577572368384 |
---|---|
author | Marres, G. M. H. van der Eijk, J. Bemelman, M. Leenen, L. P. H. |
author_facet | Marres, G. M. H. van der Eijk, J. Bemelman, M. Leenen, L. P. H. |
author_sort | Marres, G. M. H. |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: The Major Incident Hospital (MIH) is a unique facility strictly reserved to provide immediate large-scale emergency care for victims of disasters and major incidents. We evaluated the implemented organization to identify strengths and weaknesses, and provide knowledge essential for further improvement of preparedness. METHOD: According to the Protocol for Reports from Major accidents and Disasters (PRMD) and along with our five scenarios for activation, we analyzed all the data from evaluation reports of all our deployments since the MIH was founded in 1991. RESULTS: The MIH was able to provide group-wise emergency care to military (29 admissions) as well as civilian victims of major incidents and disasters, both national (260) and international (226). Group-wise treatment was advantageous for quarantine, logistics, registration, emotional support and (pre)arrangements for family, media and security. Strong points are preparedness and availability of a dedicated facility, including ICU, X-ray and OR facilities, irrespective of MRSA status and prearranged cooperation, e.g., with a trauma centre, poison centre and the military. Evaluation, research and training resulted in a barcode registration system and continuous adaptations to improve preparedness. Shortage of resources did not occur; use of the MIH’s available resources for national incidents though, could be further optimized. CONCLUSIONS: Recommendations for the future are: improvement of imbedding in regional and national procedures, continued dedicated time and staff for training, research and development, improvement of nuclear/biological/chemical decontamination facilities and preparedness, implementation of standardized scoring systems and expansion of registration systems to the prehospital setting. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00068-010-0067-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3150834 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | Springer-Verlag |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-31508342011-08-09 Evaluation of admissions to the Major Incident Hospital based on a standardized protocol Marres, G. M. H. van der Eijk, J. Bemelman, M. Leenen, L. P. H. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg Original Article INTRODUCTION: The Major Incident Hospital (MIH) is a unique facility strictly reserved to provide immediate large-scale emergency care for victims of disasters and major incidents. We evaluated the implemented organization to identify strengths and weaknesses, and provide knowledge essential for further improvement of preparedness. METHOD: According to the Protocol for Reports from Major accidents and Disasters (PRMD) and along with our five scenarios for activation, we analyzed all the data from evaluation reports of all our deployments since the MIH was founded in 1991. RESULTS: The MIH was able to provide group-wise emergency care to military (29 admissions) as well as civilian victims of major incidents and disasters, both national (260) and international (226). Group-wise treatment was advantageous for quarantine, logistics, registration, emotional support and (pre)arrangements for family, media and security. Strong points are preparedness and availability of a dedicated facility, including ICU, X-ray and OR facilities, irrespective of MRSA status and prearranged cooperation, e.g., with a trauma centre, poison centre and the military. Evaluation, research and training resulted in a barcode registration system and continuous adaptations to improve preparedness. Shortage of resources did not occur; use of the MIH’s available resources for national incidents though, could be further optimized. CONCLUSIONS: Recommendations for the future are: improvement of imbedding in regional and national procedures, continued dedicated time and staff for training, research and development, improvement of nuclear/biological/chemical decontamination facilities and preparedness, implementation of standardized scoring systems and expansion of registration systems to the prehospital setting. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00068-010-0067-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer-Verlag 2011-02-03 2011 /pmc/articles/PMC3150834/ /pubmed/21837255 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00068-010-0067-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2011 Open AccessThis is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Marres, G. M. H. van der Eijk, J. Bemelman, M. Leenen, L. P. H. Evaluation of admissions to the Major Incident Hospital based on a standardized protocol |
title | Evaluation of admissions to the Major Incident Hospital based on a standardized protocol |
title_full | Evaluation of admissions to the Major Incident Hospital based on a standardized protocol |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of admissions to the Major Incident Hospital based on a standardized protocol |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of admissions to the Major Incident Hospital based on a standardized protocol |
title_short | Evaluation of admissions to the Major Incident Hospital based on a standardized protocol |
title_sort | evaluation of admissions to the major incident hospital based on a standardized protocol |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3150834/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21837255 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00068-010-0067-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT marresgmh evaluationofadmissionstothemajorincidenthospitalbasedonastandardizedprotocol AT vandereijkj evaluationofadmissionstothemajorincidenthospitalbasedonastandardizedprotocol AT bemelmanm evaluationofadmissionstothemajorincidenthospitalbasedonastandardizedprotocol AT leenenlph evaluationofadmissionstothemajorincidenthospitalbasedonastandardizedprotocol |