Cargando…

From screen to structure with a harvestable microfluidic device

Advances in automation have facilitated the widespread adoption of high-throughput vapour-diffusion methods for initial crystallization screening. However, for many proteins, screening thousands of crystallization conditions fails to yield crystals of sufficient quality for structural characterizati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stojanoff, Vivian, Jakoncic, Jean, Oren, Deena A., Nagarajan, V., Navarro Poulsen, Jens-Christian, Adams-Cioaba, Melanie A., Bergfors, Terese, Sommer, Morten O. A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: International Union of Crystallography 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3151141/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21821908
http://dx.doi.org/10.1107/S1744309111024456
_version_ 1782209583837609984
author Stojanoff, Vivian
Jakoncic, Jean
Oren, Deena A.
Nagarajan, V.
Navarro Poulsen, Jens-Christian
Adams-Cioaba, Melanie A.
Bergfors, Terese
Sommer, Morten O. A.
author_facet Stojanoff, Vivian
Jakoncic, Jean
Oren, Deena A.
Nagarajan, V.
Navarro Poulsen, Jens-Christian
Adams-Cioaba, Melanie A.
Bergfors, Terese
Sommer, Morten O. A.
author_sort Stojanoff, Vivian
collection PubMed
description Advances in automation have facilitated the widespread adoption of high-throughput vapour-diffusion methods for initial crystallization screening. However, for many proteins, screening thousands of crystallization conditions fails to yield crystals of sufficient quality for structural characterization. Here, the rates of crystal identification for thaumatin, catalase and myoglobin using microfluidic Crystal Former devices and sitting-drop vapour-diffusion plates are compared. It is shown that the Crystal Former results in a greater number of identified initial crystallization conditions compared with vapour diffusion. Furthermore, crystals of thaumatin and lysozyme obtained in the Crystal Former were used directly for structure determination both in situ and upon harvesting and cryocooling. On the basis of these results, a crystallization strategy is proposed that uses multiple methods with distinct kinetic trajectories through the protein phase diagram to increase the output of crystallization pipelines.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3151141
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher International Union of Crystallography
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31511412011-08-08 From screen to structure with a harvestable microfluidic device Stojanoff, Vivian Jakoncic, Jean Oren, Deena A. Nagarajan, V. Navarro Poulsen, Jens-Christian Adams-Cioaba, Melanie A. Bergfors, Terese Sommer, Morten O. A. Acta Crystallogr Sect F Struct Biol Cryst Commun Laboratory Communications Advances in automation have facilitated the widespread adoption of high-throughput vapour-diffusion methods for initial crystallization screening. However, for many proteins, screening thousands of crystallization conditions fails to yield crystals of sufficient quality for structural characterization. Here, the rates of crystal identification for thaumatin, catalase and myoglobin using microfluidic Crystal Former devices and sitting-drop vapour-diffusion plates are compared. It is shown that the Crystal Former results in a greater number of identified initial crystallization conditions compared with vapour diffusion. Furthermore, crystals of thaumatin and lysozyme obtained in the Crystal Former were used directly for structure determination both in situ and upon harvesting and cryocooling. On the basis of these results, a crystallization strategy is proposed that uses multiple methods with distinct kinetic trajectories through the protein phase diagram to increase the output of crystallization pipelines. International Union of Crystallography 2011-07-26 /pmc/articles/PMC3151141/ /pubmed/21821908 http://dx.doi.org/10.1107/S1744309111024456 Text en © Stojanoff et al. 2011 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/uk/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.
spellingShingle Laboratory Communications
Stojanoff, Vivian
Jakoncic, Jean
Oren, Deena A.
Nagarajan, V.
Navarro Poulsen, Jens-Christian
Adams-Cioaba, Melanie A.
Bergfors, Terese
Sommer, Morten O. A.
From screen to structure with a harvestable microfluidic device
title From screen to structure with a harvestable microfluidic device
title_full From screen to structure with a harvestable microfluidic device
title_fullStr From screen to structure with a harvestable microfluidic device
title_full_unstemmed From screen to structure with a harvestable microfluidic device
title_short From screen to structure with a harvestable microfluidic device
title_sort from screen to structure with a harvestable microfluidic device
topic Laboratory Communications
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3151141/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21821908
http://dx.doi.org/10.1107/S1744309111024456
work_keys_str_mv AT stojanoffvivian fromscreentostructurewithaharvestablemicrofluidicdevice
AT jakoncicjean fromscreentostructurewithaharvestablemicrofluidicdevice
AT orendeenaa fromscreentostructurewithaharvestablemicrofluidicdevice
AT nagarajanv fromscreentostructurewithaharvestablemicrofluidicdevice
AT navarropoulsenjenschristian fromscreentostructurewithaharvestablemicrofluidicdevice
AT adamscioabamelaniea fromscreentostructurewithaharvestablemicrofluidicdevice
AT bergforsterese fromscreentostructurewithaharvestablemicrofluidicdevice
AT sommermortenoa fromscreentostructurewithaharvestablemicrofluidicdevice