Cargando…

Taylor Dispersion Analysis Compared to Dynamic Light Scattering for the Size Analysis of Therapeutic Peptides and Proteins and Their Aggregates

PURPOSE: To evaluate Taylor dispersion analysis (TDA) as a novel method for determination of hydrodynamic radius of therapeutic peptides and proteins in non-stressed and stressed formulations and to compare it with dynamic light scattering (DLS). METHODS: The hydrodynamic radius of oxytocin, bovine...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hawe, Andrea, Hulse, Wendy L., Jiskoot, Wim, Forbes, Robert T.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3151397/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21560019
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11095-011-0460-3
_version_ 1782209613341392896
author Hawe, Andrea
Hulse, Wendy L.
Jiskoot, Wim
Forbes, Robert T.
author_facet Hawe, Andrea
Hulse, Wendy L.
Jiskoot, Wim
Forbes, Robert T.
author_sort Hawe, Andrea
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To evaluate Taylor dispersion analysis (TDA) as a novel method for determination of hydrodynamic radius of therapeutic peptides and proteins in non-stressed and stressed formulations and to compare it with dynamic light scattering (DLS). METHODS: The hydrodynamic radius of oxytocin, bovine serum albumin, various monoclonal antibodies (type IgG) and etanercept at concentrations between 0.05 and 50 mg/ml was determined by TDA and DLS. IgGs and etanercept were stressed (elevated temperatures) and analyzed by TDA, DLS and HP-SEC. RESULTS: TDA and DLS were comparable in sizing non-stressed peptides and proteins in a concentration range of about 0.5 to 50 mg/ml. TDA performed well even at lower concentrations, where DLS tends to provide theoretically high values of the Z-average radius. However, because of differences in the detection physics, DLS was more weighted towards the detection of aggregates in stressed formulations than TDA. Advantageously, TDA was also able to size the small peptide oxytocin, which was not feasible by DLS. CONCLUSION: TDA allows the accurate determination of the hydrodynamic radius of peptides and proteins over a wide concentration range, with little interference from excipients present in the sample. It is marginally less sensitive than DLS in detecting size increase for stressed protein samples.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3151397
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31513972011-09-21 Taylor Dispersion Analysis Compared to Dynamic Light Scattering for the Size Analysis of Therapeutic Peptides and Proteins and Their Aggregates Hawe, Andrea Hulse, Wendy L. Jiskoot, Wim Forbes, Robert T. Pharm Res Research Paper PURPOSE: To evaluate Taylor dispersion analysis (TDA) as a novel method for determination of hydrodynamic radius of therapeutic peptides and proteins in non-stressed and stressed formulations and to compare it with dynamic light scattering (DLS). METHODS: The hydrodynamic radius of oxytocin, bovine serum albumin, various monoclonal antibodies (type IgG) and etanercept at concentrations between 0.05 and 50 mg/ml was determined by TDA and DLS. IgGs and etanercept were stressed (elevated temperatures) and analyzed by TDA, DLS and HP-SEC. RESULTS: TDA and DLS were comparable in sizing non-stressed peptides and proteins in a concentration range of about 0.5 to 50 mg/ml. TDA performed well even at lower concentrations, where DLS tends to provide theoretically high values of the Z-average radius. However, because of differences in the detection physics, DLS was more weighted towards the detection of aggregates in stressed formulations than TDA. Advantageously, TDA was also able to size the small peptide oxytocin, which was not feasible by DLS. CONCLUSION: TDA allows the accurate determination of the hydrodynamic radius of peptides and proteins over a wide concentration range, with little interference from excipients present in the sample. It is marginally less sensitive than DLS in detecting size increase for stressed protein samples. Springer US 2011-05-11 2011 /pmc/articles/PMC3151397/ /pubmed/21560019 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11095-011-0460-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2011 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Paper
Hawe, Andrea
Hulse, Wendy L.
Jiskoot, Wim
Forbes, Robert T.
Taylor Dispersion Analysis Compared to Dynamic Light Scattering for the Size Analysis of Therapeutic Peptides and Proteins and Their Aggregates
title Taylor Dispersion Analysis Compared to Dynamic Light Scattering for the Size Analysis of Therapeutic Peptides and Proteins and Their Aggregates
title_full Taylor Dispersion Analysis Compared to Dynamic Light Scattering for the Size Analysis of Therapeutic Peptides and Proteins and Their Aggregates
title_fullStr Taylor Dispersion Analysis Compared to Dynamic Light Scattering for the Size Analysis of Therapeutic Peptides and Proteins and Their Aggregates
title_full_unstemmed Taylor Dispersion Analysis Compared to Dynamic Light Scattering for the Size Analysis of Therapeutic Peptides and Proteins and Their Aggregates
title_short Taylor Dispersion Analysis Compared to Dynamic Light Scattering for the Size Analysis of Therapeutic Peptides and Proteins and Their Aggregates
title_sort taylor dispersion analysis compared to dynamic light scattering for the size analysis of therapeutic peptides and proteins and their aggregates
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3151397/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21560019
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11095-011-0460-3
work_keys_str_mv AT haweandrea taylordispersionanalysiscomparedtodynamiclightscatteringforthesizeanalysisoftherapeuticpeptidesandproteinsandtheiraggregates
AT hulsewendyl taylordispersionanalysiscomparedtodynamiclightscatteringforthesizeanalysisoftherapeuticpeptidesandproteinsandtheiraggregates
AT jiskootwim taylordispersionanalysiscomparedtodynamiclightscatteringforthesizeanalysisoftherapeuticpeptidesandproteinsandtheiraggregates
AT forbesrobertt taylordispersionanalysiscomparedtodynamiclightscatteringforthesizeanalysisoftherapeuticpeptidesandproteinsandtheiraggregates