Cargando…

INVESTIGATE-I (INVasive Evaluation before Surgical Treatment of Incontinence Gives Added Therapeutic Effect?): study protocol for a mixed methods study to assess the feasibility of a future randomised controlled trial of the clinical utility of invasive urodynamic testing

BACKGROUND: Urinary incontinence is an important health problem to the individual sufferer and to health services. Stress and stress predominant mixed urinary incontinence are increasingly managed by surgery due to advances in surgical techniques. Despite the lack of evidence for its clinical utilit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Murdoch, Megan, McColl, Elaine, Howel, Denise, Deverill, Mark, Buckley, Brian S, Lucas, Malcolm, Chapple, Christopher R, Tincello, Douglas G, Armstrong, Natalie, Brennand, Cath, Shen, Jing, Vale, Luke, Hilton, Paul
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3152523/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21733166
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-12-169
_version_ 1782209773830144000
author Murdoch, Megan
McColl, Elaine
Howel, Denise
Deverill, Mark
Buckley, Brian S
Lucas, Malcolm
Chapple, Christopher R
Tincello, Douglas G
Armstrong, Natalie
Brennand, Cath
Shen, Jing
Vale, Luke
Hilton, Paul
author_facet Murdoch, Megan
McColl, Elaine
Howel, Denise
Deverill, Mark
Buckley, Brian S
Lucas, Malcolm
Chapple, Christopher R
Tincello, Douglas G
Armstrong, Natalie
Brennand, Cath
Shen, Jing
Vale, Luke
Hilton, Paul
author_sort Murdoch, Megan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Urinary incontinence is an important health problem to the individual sufferer and to health services. Stress and stress predominant mixed urinary incontinence are increasingly managed by surgery due to advances in surgical techniques. Despite the lack of evidence for its clinical utility, most clinicians undertake invasive urodynamic testing (IUT) to confirm a functional diagnosis of urodynamic stress incontinence before offering surgery for this condition. IUT is expensive, embarrassing and uncomfortable for women and carries a small risk. Recent systematic reviews have confirmed the lack of high quality evidence of effectiveness. The aim of this pilot study is to test the feasibility of a future definitive randomised control trial that would address whether IUT alters treatment decisions and treatment outcome in these women and would test its clinical and cost effectiveness. METHODS/DESIGN: This is a mixed methods pragmatic multicentre feasibility pilot study with four components:- (a) A multicentre, external pilot randomised trial comparing basic clinical assessment with non-invasive tests and IUT. The outcome measures are rates of recruitment, randomisation and data completion. Data will be used to estimate sample size necessary for the definitive trial. (b) Qualitative interviews of a purposively sampled sub-set of women eligible for the pilot trial will explore willingness to participate, be randomised and their overall trial experience. (c) A national survey of clinicians to determine their views of IUT in this context, the main outcome being their willingness to randomise patients into the definitive trial. (d) Qualitative interviews of a purposively sampled group of these clinicians will explore whether and how they use IUT to inform their decisions. DISCUSSION: The pilot trial will provide evidence of feasibility and acceptability and therefore inform the decision whether to proceed to the definitive trial. Results will inform the design and conduct of the definitive trial and ensure its effectiveness in achieving its research aim. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN71327395 assigned 7(th )June 2010.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3152523
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31525232011-08-09 INVESTIGATE-I (INVasive Evaluation before Surgical Treatment of Incontinence Gives Added Therapeutic Effect?): study protocol for a mixed methods study to assess the feasibility of a future randomised controlled trial of the clinical utility of invasive urodynamic testing Murdoch, Megan McColl, Elaine Howel, Denise Deverill, Mark Buckley, Brian S Lucas, Malcolm Chapple, Christopher R Tincello, Douglas G Armstrong, Natalie Brennand, Cath Shen, Jing Vale, Luke Hilton, Paul Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Urinary incontinence is an important health problem to the individual sufferer and to health services. Stress and stress predominant mixed urinary incontinence are increasingly managed by surgery due to advances in surgical techniques. Despite the lack of evidence for its clinical utility, most clinicians undertake invasive urodynamic testing (IUT) to confirm a functional diagnosis of urodynamic stress incontinence before offering surgery for this condition. IUT is expensive, embarrassing and uncomfortable for women and carries a small risk. Recent systematic reviews have confirmed the lack of high quality evidence of effectiveness. The aim of this pilot study is to test the feasibility of a future definitive randomised control trial that would address whether IUT alters treatment decisions and treatment outcome in these women and would test its clinical and cost effectiveness. METHODS/DESIGN: This is a mixed methods pragmatic multicentre feasibility pilot study with four components:- (a) A multicentre, external pilot randomised trial comparing basic clinical assessment with non-invasive tests and IUT. The outcome measures are rates of recruitment, randomisation and data completion. Data will be used to estimate sample size necessary for the definitive trial. (b) Qualitative interviews of a purposively sampled sub-set of women eligible for the pilot trial will explore willingness to participate, be randomised and their overall trial experience. (c) A national survey of clinicians to determine their views of IUT in this context, the main outcome being their willingness to randomise patients into the definitive trial. (d) Qualitative interviews of a purposively sampled group of these clinicians will explore whether and how they use IUT to inform their decisions. DISCUSSION: The pilot trial will provide evidence of feasibility and acceptability and therefore inform the decision whether to proceed to the definitive trial. Results will inform the design and conduct of the definitive trial and ensure its effectiveness in achieving its research aim. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN71327395 assigned 7(th )June 2010. BioMed Central 2011-07-06 /pmc/articles/PMC3152523/ /pubmed/21733166 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-12-169 Text en Copyright ©2011 Murdoch et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Murdoch, Megan
McColl, Elaine
Howel, Denise
Deverill, Mark
Buckley, Brian S
Lucas, Malcolm
Chapple, Christopher R
Tincello, Douglas G
Armstrong, Natalie
Brennand, Cath
Shen, Jing
Vale, Luke
Hilton, Paul
INVESTIGATE-I (INVasive Evaluation before Surgical Treatment of Incontinence Gives Added Therapeutic Effect?): study protocol for a mixed methods study to assess the feasibility of a future randomised controlled trial of the clinical utility of invasive urodynamic testing
title INVESTIGATE-I (INVasive Evaluation before Surgical Treatment of Incontinence Gives Added Therapeutic Effect?): study protocol for a mixed methods study to assess the feasibility of a future randomised controlled trial of the clinical utility of invasive urodynamic testing
title_full INVESTIGATE-I (INVasive Evaluation before Surgical Treatment of Incontinence Gives Added Therapeutic Effect?): study protocol for a mixed methods study to assess the feasibility of a future randomised controlled trial of the clinical utility of invasive urodynamic testing
title_fullStr INVESTIGATE-I (INVasive Evaluation before Surgical Treatment of Incontinence Gives Added Therapeutic Effect?): study protocol for a mixed methods study to assess the feasibility of a future randomised controlled trial of the clinical utility of invasive urodynamic testing
title_full_unstemmed INVESTIGATE-I (INVasive Evaluation before Surgical Treatment of Incontinence Gives Added Therapeutic Effect?): study protocol for a mixed methods study to assess the feasibility of a future randomised controlled trial of the clinical utility of invasive urodynamic testing
title_short INVESTIGATE-I (INVasive Evaluation before Surgical Treatment of Incontinence Gives Added Therapeutic Effect?): study protocol for a mixed methods study to assess the feasibility of a future randomised controlled trial of the clinical utility of invasive urodynamic testing
title_sort investigate-i (invasive evaluation before surgical treatment of incontinence gives added therapeutic effect?): study protocol for a mixed methods study to assess the feasibility of a future randomised controlled trial of the clinical utility of invasive urodynamic testing
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3152523/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21733166
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-12-169
work_keys_str_mv AT murdochmegan investigateiinvasiveevaluationbeforesurgicaltreatmentofincontinencegivesaddedtherapeuticeffectstudyprotocolforamixedmethodsstudytoassessthefeasibilityofafuturerandomisedcontrolledtrialoftheclinicalutilityofinvasiveurodynamictesting
AT mccollelaine investigateiinvasiveevaluationbeforesurgicaltreatmentofincontinencegivesaddedtherapeuticeffectstudyprotocolforamixedmethodsstudytoassessthefeasibilityofafuturerandomisedcontrolledtrialoftheclinicalutilityofinvasiveurodynamictesting
AT howeldenise investigateiinvasiveevaluationbeforesurgicaltreatmentofincontinencegivesaddedtherapeuticeffectstudyprotocolforamixedmethodsstudytoassessthefeasibilityofafuturerandomisedcontrolledtrialoftheclinicalutilityofinvasiveurodynamictesting
AT deverillmark investigateiinvasiveevaluationbeforesurgicaltreatmentofincontinencegivesaddedtherapeuticeffectstudyprotocolforamixedmethodsstudytoassessthefeasibilityofafuturerandomisedcontrolledtrialoftheclinicalutilityofinvasiveurodynamictesting
AT buckleybrians investigateiinvasiveevaluationbeforesurgicaltreatmentofincontinencegivesaddedtherapeuticeffectstudyprotocolforamixedmethodsstudytoassessthefeasibilityofafuturerandomisedcontrolledtrialoftheclinicalutilityofinvasiveurodynamictesting
AT lucasmalcolm investigateiinvasiveevaluationbeforesurgicaltreatmentofincontinencegivesaddedtherapeuticeffectstudyprotocolforamixedmethodsstudytoassessthefeasibilityofafuturerandomisedcontrolledtrialoftheclinicalutilityofinvasiveurodynamictesting
AT chapplechristopherr investigateiinvasiveevaluationbeforesurgicaltreatmentofincontinencegivesaddedtherapeuticeffectstudyprotocolforamixedmethodsstudytoassessthefeasibilityofafuturerandomisedcontrolledtrialoftheclinicalutilityofinvasiveurodynamictesting
AT tincellodouglasg investigateiinvasiveevaluationbeforesurgicaltreatmentofincontinencegivesaddedtherapeuticeffectstudyprotocolforamixedmethodsstudytoassessthefeasibilityofafuturerandomisedcontrolledtrialoftheclinicalutilityofinvasiveurodynamictesting
AT armstrongnatalie investigateiinvasiveevaluationbeforesurgicaltreatmentofincontinencegivesaddedtherapeuticeffectstudyprotocolforamixedmethodsstudytoassessthefeasibilityofafuturerandomisedcontrolledtrialoftheclinicalutilityofinvasiveurodynamictesting
AT brennandcath investigateiinvasiveevaluationbeforesurgicaltreatmentofincontinencegivesaddedtherapeuticeffectstudyprotocolforamixedmethodsstudytoassessthefeasibilityofafuturerandomisedcontrolledtrialoftheclinicalutilityofinvasiveurodynamictesting
AT shenjing investigateiinvasiveevaluationbeforesurgicaltreatmentofincontinencegivesaddedtherapeuticeffectstudyprotocolforamixedmethodsstudytoassessthefeasibilityofafuturerandomisedcontrolledtrialoftheclinicalutilityofinvasiveurodynamictesting
AT valeluke investigateiinvasiveevaluationbeforesurgicaltreatmentofincontinencegivesaddedtherapeuticeffectstudyprotocolforamixedmethodsstudytoassessthefeasibilityofafuturerandomisedcontrolledtrialoftheclinicalutilityofinvasiveurodynamictesting
AT hiltonpaul investigateiinvasiveevaluationbeforesurgicaltreatmentofincontinencegivesaddedtherapeuticeffectstudyprotocolforamixedmethodsstudytoassessthefeasibilityofafuturerandomisedcontrolledtrialoftheclinicalutilityofinvasiveurodynamictesting