Cargando…

Which is worse: uterine papillary serous carcinomas or carcinosarcomas?

OBJECTIVE: It is clear that uterine carcinosarcomas and uterine papillary serous carcinomas (UPSC) have an adverse impact on outcome, but whether carcinosarcomas are worse than UPSC is unclear. The purpose of this study is to compare the pathology, survival, and disease recurrence of patients with c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Song, Taejong, Choi, Chel Hun, Lee, Yoo-Young, Kim, Tae-Joong, Lee, Jeong-Won, Kim, Byoung-Gie, Bae, Duk-Soo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology and Colposcopy 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3152760/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21860733
http://dx.doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2011.22.2.83
_version_ 1782209799915569152
author Song, Taejong
Choi, Chel Hun
Lee, Yoo-Young
Kim, Tae-Joong
Lee, Jeong-Won
Kim, Byoung-Gie
Bae, Duk-Soo
author_facet Song, Taejong
Choi, Chel Hun
Lee, Yoo-Young
Kim, Tae-Joong
Lee, Jeong-Won
Kim, Byoung-Gie
Bae, Duk-Soo
author_sort Song, Taejong
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: It is clear that uterine carcinosarcomas and uterine papillary serous carcinomas (UPSC) have an adverse impact on outcome, but whether carcinosarcomas are worse than UPSC is unclear. The purpose of this study is to compare the pathology, survival, and disease recurrence of patients with carcinosarcomas to patients with UPSC. METHODS: The medical records of patients diagnosed with carcinosarcomas and UPSC between 1996 and 2009 at Samsung Medical Center were retrospectively analyzed. Information from pathology reports, site of relapse, time to recurrence, and death was obtained. The survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Thirty seven patients with carcinosarcomas and 38 patients with UPSC were identified during the study period. There was no significant difference in clinical characteristics including age, body mass index, proportion with advanced stage disease, rate of optimal debulking, and adjuvant treatment used. In addition, the pathology showed no significant difference in tumor size, myometrial involvement, lymphovascular invasion, peritoneal cytology, cervical invasion, and lymph node involvement. Patients with carcinosarcomas had similar patterns of relapse as the patients with UPSC. There was no difference in the progression-free and overall survival between the carcinosarcomas and UPSC patients (p=0.804 and p=0.651, respectively). CONCLUSION: Patients with carcinosarcomas had similar clinicopathological features compared to the patients with UPSC.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3152760
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology and Colposcopy
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31527602011-08-22 Which is worse: uterine papillary serous carcinomas or carcinosarcomas? Song, Taejong Choi, Chel Hun Lee, Yoo-Young Kim, Tae-Joong Lee, Jeong-Won Kim, Byoung-Gie Bae, Duk-Soo J Gynecol Oncol Original Article OBJECTIVE: It is clear that uterine carcinosarcomas and uterine papillary serous carcinomas (UPSC) have an adverse impact on outcome, but whether carcinosarcomas are worse than UPSC is unclear. The purpose of this study is to compare the pathology, survival, and disease recurrence of patients with carcinosarcomas to patients with UPSC. METHODS: The medical records of patients diagnosed with carcinosarcomas and UPSC between 1996 and 2009 at Samsung Medical Center were retrospectively analyzed. Information from pathology reports, site of relapse, time to recurrence, and death was obtained. The survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Thirty seven patients with carcinosarcomas and 38 patients with UPSC were identified during the study period. There was no significant difference in clinical characteristics including age, body mass index, proportion with advanced stage disease, rate of optimal debulking, and adjuvant treatment used. In addition, the pathology showed no significant difference in tumor size, myometrial involvement, lymphovascular invasion, peritoneal cytology, cervical invasion, and lymph node involvement. Patients with carcinosarcomas had similar patterns of relapse as the patients with UPSC. There was no difference in the progression-free and overall survival between the carcinosarcomas and UPSC patients (p=0.804 and p=0.651, respectively). CONCLUSION: Patients with carcinosarcomas had similar clinicopathological features compared to the patients with UPSC. Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology and Colposcopy 2011-06-30 2011-06-30 /pmc/articles/PMC3152760/ /pubmed/21860733 http://dx.doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2011.22.2.83 Text en Copyright © 2011. Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology, Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology and Colposcopy http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Song, Taejong
Choi, Chel Hun
Lee, Yoo-Young
Kim, Tae-Joong
Lee, Jeong-Won
Kim, Byoung-Gie
Bae, Duk-Soo
Which is worse: uterine papillary serous carcinomas or carcinosarcomas?
title Which is worse: uterine papillary serous carcinomas or carcinosarcomas?
title_full Which is worse: uterine papillary serous carcinomas or carcinosarcomas?
title_fullStr Which is worse: uterine papillary serous carcinomas or carcinosarcomas?
title_full_unstemmed Which is worse: uterine papillary serous carcinomas or carcinosarcomas?
title_short Which is worse: uterine papillary serous carcinomas or carcinosarcomas?
title_sort which is worse: uterine papillary serous carcinomas or carcinosarcomas?
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3152760/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21860733
http://dx.doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2011.22.2.83
work_keys_str_mv AT songtaejong whichisworseuterinepapillaryserouscarcinomasorcarcinosarcomas
AT choichelhun whichisworseuterinepapillaryserouscarcinomasorcarcinosarcomas
AT leeyooyoung whichisworseuterinepapillaryserouscarcinomasorcarcinosarcomas
AT kimtaejoong whichisworseuterinepapillaryserouscarcinomasorcarcinosarcomas
AT leejeongwon whichisworseuterinepapillaryserouscarcinomasorcarcinosarcomas
AT kimbyounggie whichisworseuterinepapillaryserouscarcinomasorcarcinosarcomas
AT baeduksoo whichisworseuterinepapillaryserouscarcinomasorcarcinosarcomas