Cargando…
A Comparative Study of Embedded and Anesthetized Zebrafish in vivo on Myocardiac Calcium Oscillation and Heart Muscle Contraction
The zebrafish (Danio rerio) has been used as a model for studying vertebrate development in the cardiovascular system. In order to monitor heart contraction and cytosolic calcium oscillations, fish were either embedded in methylcellulose or anesthetized with tricaine. Using high-resolution different...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Research Foundation
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3153013/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21833178 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2010.00139 |
_version_ | 1782209831460929536 |
---|---|
author | Muntean, Brian S. Horvat, Christine M. Behler, James H. AbouAlaiwi, Wissam A. Nauli, Andromeda M. Williams, Frederick E. Nauli, Surya M. |
author_facet | Muntean, Brian S. Horvat, Christine M. Behler, James H. AbouAlaiwi, Wissam A. Nauli, Andromeda M. Williams, Frederick E. Nauli, Surya M. |
author_sort | Muntean, Brian S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The zebrafish (Danio rerio) has been used as a model for studying vertebrate development in the cardiovascular system. In order to monitor heart contraction and cytosolic calcium oscillations, fish were either embedded in methylcellulose or anesthetized with tricaine. Using high-resolution differential interference contrast and calcium imaging microscopy, we here show that dopamine and verapamil alter calcium signaling and muscle contraction in anesthetized zebrafish, but not in embedded zebrafish. In anesthetized fish, dopamine increases the amplitude of cytosolic calcium oscillation with a subsequent increase in heart contraction, whereas verapamil decreases the frequency of calcium oscillation and heart rate. Interestingly, verapamil also increases myocardial contraction. Our data further indicate that verapamil can increase myocardial calcium sensitivity in anesthetized fish. Taken together, our data reinforce in vivo cardiac responses to dopamine and verapamil. Furthermore, effects of dopamine and verapamil on myocardial calcium and contraction are greater in anesthetized than embedded fish. We suggest that while the zebrafish is an excellent model for a cardiovascular imaging study, the cardio-pharmacological profiles are very different between anesthetized and embedded fish. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3153013 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | Frontiers Research Foundation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-31530132011-08-10 A Comparative Study of Embedded and Anesthetized Zebrafish in vivo on Myocardiac Calcium Oscillation and Heart Muscle Contraction Muntean, Brian S. Horvat, Christine M. Behler, James H. AbouAlaiwi, Wissam A. Nauli, Andromeda M. Williams, Frederick E. Nauli, Surya M. Front Pharmacol Pharmacology The zebrafish (Danio rerio) has been used as a model for studying vertebrate development in the cardiovascular system. In order to monitor heart contraction and cytosolic calcium oscillations, fish were either embedded in methylcellulose or anesthetized with tricaine. Using high-resolution differential interference contrast and calcium imaging microscopy, we here show that dopamine and verapamil alter calcium signaling and muscle contraction in anesthetized zebrafish, but not in embedded zebrafish. In anesthetized fish, dopamine increases the amplitude of cytosolic calcium oscillation with a subsequent increase in heart contraction, whereas verapamil decreases the frequency of calcium oscillation and heart rate. Interestingly, verapamil also increases myocardial contraction. Our data further indicate that verapamil can increase myocardial calcium sensitivity in anesthetized fish. Taken together, our data reinforce in vivo cardiac responses to dopamine and verapamil. Furthermore, effects of dopamine and verapamil on myocardial calcium and contraction are greater in anesthetized than embedded fish. We suggest that while the zebrafish is an excellent model for a cardiovascular imaging study, the cardio-pharmacological profiles are very different between anesthetized and embedded fish. Frontiers Research Foundation 2010-12-06 /pmc/articles/PMC3153013/ /pubmed/21833178 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2010.00139 Text en Copyright © 2010 Muntean, Horvat, Behler, AbouAlaiwi, Nauli, Williams and Nauli. http://www.frontiersin.org/licenseagreement This is an open-access article subject to an exclusive license agreement between the authors and the Frontiers Research Foundation, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Pharmacology Muntean, Brian S. Horvat, Christine M. Behler, James H. AbouAlaiwi, Wissam A. Nauli, Andromeda M. Williams, Frederick E. Nauli, Surya M. A Comparative Study of Embedded and Anesthetized Zebrafish in vivo on Myocardiac Calcium Oscillation and Heart Muscle Contraction |
title | A Comparative Study of Embedded and Anesthetized Zebrafish in vivo on Myocardiac Calcium Oscillation and Heart Muscle Contraction |
title_full | A Comparative Study of Embedded and Anesthetized Zebrafish in vivo on Myocardiac Calcium Oscillation and Heart Muscle Contraction |
title_fullStr | A Comparative Study of Embedded and Anesthetized Zebrafish in vivo on Myocardiac Calcium Oscillation and Heart Muscle Contraction |
title_full_unstemmed | A Comparative Study of Embedded and Anesthetized Zebrafish in vivo on Myocardiac Calcium Oscillation and Heart Muscle Contraction |
title_short | A Comparative Study of Embedded and Anesthetized Zebrafish in vivo on Myocardiac Calcium Oscillation and Heart Muscle Contraction |
title_sort | comparative study of embedded and anesthetized zebrafish in vivo on myocardiac calcium oscillation and heart muscle contraction |
topic | Pharmacology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3153013/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21833178 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2010.00139 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT munteanbrians acomparativestudyofembeddedandanesthetizedzebrafishinvivoonmyocardiaccalciumoscillationandheartmusclecontraction AT horvatchristinem acomparativestudyofembeddedandanesthetizedzebrafishinvivoonmyocardiaccalciumoscillationandheartmusclecontraction AT behlerjamesh acomparativestudyofembeddedandanesthetizedzebrafishinvivoonmyocardiaccalciumoscillationandheartmusclecontraction AT aboualaiwiwissama acomparativestudyofembeddedandanesthetizedzebrafishinvivoonmyocardiaccalciumoscillationandheartmusclecontraction AT nauliandromedam acomparativestudyofembeddedandanesthetizedzebrafishinvivoonmyocardiaccalciumoscillationandheartmusclecontraction AT williamsfredericke acomparativestudyofembeddedandanesthetizedzebrafishinvivoonmyocardiaccalciumoscillationandheartmusclecontraction AT naulisuryam acomparativestudyofembeddedandanesthetizedzebrafishinvivoonmyocardiaccalciumoscillationandheartmusclecontraction AT munteanbrians comparativestudyofembeddedandanesthetizedzebrafishinvivoonmyocardiaccalciumoscillationandheartmusclecontraction AT horvatchristinem comparativestudyofembeddedandanesthetizedzebrafishinvivoonmyocardiaccalciumoscillationandheartmusclecontraction AT behlerjamesh comparativestudyofembeddedandanesthetizedzebrafishinvivoonmyocardiaccalciumoscillationandheartmusclecontraction AT aboualaiwiwissama comparativestudyofembeddedandanesthetizedzebrafishinvivoonmyocardiaccalciumoscillationandheartmusclecontraction AT nauliandromedam comparativestudyofembeddedandanesthetizedzebrafishinvivoonmyocardiaccalciumoscillationandheartmusclecontraction AT williamsfredericke comparativestudyofembeddedandanesthetizedzebrafishinvivoonmyocardiaccalciumoscillationandheartmusclecontraction AT naulisuryam comparativestudyofembeddedandanesthetizedzebrafishinvivoonmyocardiaccalciumoscillationandheartmusclecontraction |