Cargando…

Restricted Application of Insecticides: A Promising Tsetse Control Technique, but What Do the Farmers Think of It?

BACKGROUND: Restricted application of insecticides to cattle is a cheap and safe farmer-based method to control tsetse. In Western Africa, it is applied using a footbath, mainly to control nagana and the tick Amblyomma variegatum. In Eastern and Southern Africa, it might help controlling the human d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bouyer, Fanny, Hamadou, Seyni, Adakal, Hassane, Lancelot, Renaud, Stachurski, Frédéric, Belem, Adrien M. G., Bouyer, Jérémy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3153426/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21858241
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0001276
_version_ 1782209898349592576
author Bouyer, Fanny
Hamadou, Seyni
Adakal, Hassane
Lancelot, Renaud
Stachurski, Frédéric
Belem, Adrien M. G.
Bouyer, Jérémy
author_facet Bouyer, Fanny
Hamadou, Seyni
Adakal, Hassane
Lancelot, Renaud
Stachurski, Frédéric
Belem, Adrien M. G.
Bouyer, Jérémy
author_sort Bouyer, Fanny
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Restricted application of insecticides to cattle is a cheap and safe farmer-based method to control tsetse. In Western Africa, it is applied using a footbath, mainly to control nagana and the tick Amblyomma variegatum. In Eastern and Southern Africa, it might help controlling the human disease, i.e., Rhodesian sleeping sickness as well. The efficiency of this new control method against ticks, tsetse and trypanosomoses has been demonstrated earlier. The invention, co-built by researchers and farmers ten years ago, became an innovation in Burkina Faso through its diffusion by two development projects. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: In this research, we studied the process and level of adoption in 72 farmers inhabiting the peri-urban areas of Ouagadougou and Bobo-Dioulasso. Variables describing the livestock farming system, the implementation and perception of the method and the knowledge of the epidemiological system were used to discriminate three clusters of cattle farmers that were then compared using indicators of adoption. The first cluster corresponded to modern farmers who adopted the technique very well. The more traditional farmers were discriminated into two clusters, one of which showed a good adoption rate, whereas the second failed to adopt the method. The economic benefit and the farmers' knowledge of the epidemiological system appeared to have a low impact on the early adoption process whereas some modern practices, as well as social factors appeared critical. The quality of technical support provided to the farmers had also a great influence. Cattle farmers' innovation-risk appraisal was analyzed using Rogers' adoption criteria which highlighted individual variations in risk perceptions and benefits, as well as the prominent role of the socio-technical network of cattle farmers. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Results are discussed to highlight the factors that should be taken into consideration, to move discoveries from bench to field for an improved control of trypanosomoses vectors.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3153426
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31534262011-08-19 Restricted Application of Insecticides: A Promising Tsetse Control Technique, but What Do the Farmers Think of It? Bouyer, Fanny Hamadou, Seyni Adakal, Hassane Lancelot, Renaud Stachurski, Frédéric Belem, Adrien M. G. Bouyer, Jérémy PLoS Negl Trop Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: Restricted application of insecticides to cattle is a cheap and safe farmer-based method to control tsetse. In Western Africa, it is applied using a footbath, mainly to control nagana and the tick Amblyomma variegatum. In Eastern and Southern Africa, it might help controlling the human disease, i.e., Rhodesian sleeping sickness as well. The efficiency of this new control method against ticks, tsetse and trypanosomoses has been demonstrated earlier. The invention, co-built by researchers and farmers ten years ago, became an innovation in Burkina Faso through its diffusion by two development projects. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: In this research, we studied the process and level of adoption in 72 farmers inhabiting the peri-urban areas of Ouagadougou and Bobo-Dioulasso. Variables describing the livestock farming system, the implementation and perception of the method and the knowledge of the epidemiological system were used to discriminate three clusters of cattle farmers that were then compared using indicators of adoption. The first cluster corresponded to modern farmers who adopted the technique very well. The more traditional farmers were discriminated into two clusters, one of which showed a good adoption rate, whereas the second failed to adopt the method. The economic benefit and the farmers' knowledge of the epidemiological system appeared to have a low impact on the early adoption process whereas some modern practices, as well as social factors appeared critical. The quality of technical support provided to the farmers had also a great influence. Cattle farmers' innovation-risk appraisal was analyzed using Rogers' adoption criteria which highlighted individual variations in risk perceptions and benefits, as well as the prominent role of the socio-technical network of cattle farmers. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Results are discussed to highlight the factors that should be taken into consideration, to move discoveries from bench to field for an improved control of trypanosomoses vectors. Public Library of Science 2011-08-09 /pmc/articles/PMC3153426/ /pubmed/21858241 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0001276 Text en Bouyer et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Bouyer, Fanny
Hamadou, Seyni
Adakal, Hassane
Lancelot, Renaud
Stachurski, Frédéric
Belem, Adrien M. G.
Bouyer, Jérémy
Restricted Application of Insecticides: A Promising Tsetse Control Technique, but What Do the Farmers Think of It?
title Restricted Application of Insecticides: A Promising Tsetse Control Technique, but What Do the Farmers Think of It?
title_full Restricted Application of Insecticides: A Promising Tsetse Control Technique, but What Do the Farmers Think of It?
title_fullStr Restricted Application of Insecticides: A Promising Tsetse Control Technique, but What Do the Farmers Think of It?
title_full_unstemmed Restricted Application of Insecticides: A Promising Tsetse Control Technique, but What Do the Farmers Think of It?
title_short Restricted Application of Insecticides: A Promising Tsetse Control Technique, but What Do the Farmers Think of It?
title_sort restricted application of insecticides: a promising tsetse control technique, but what do the farmers think of it?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3153426/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21858241
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0001276
work_keys_str_mv AT bouyerfanny restrictedapplicationofinsecticidesapromisingtsetsecontroltechniquebutwhatdothefarmersthinkofit
AT hamadouseyni restrictedapplicationofinsecticidesapromisingtsetsecontroltechniquebutwhatdothefarmersthinkofit
AT adakalhassane restrictedapplicationofinsecticidesapromisingtsetsecontroltechniquebutwhatdothefarmersthinkofit
AT lancelotrenaud restrictedapplicationofinsecticidesapromisingtsetsecontroltechniquebutwhatdothefarmersthinkofit
AT stachurskifrederic restrictedapplicationofinsecticidesapromisingtsetsecontroltechniquebutwhatdothefarmersthinkofit
AT belemadrienmg restrictedapplicationofinsecticidesapromisingtsetsecontroltechniquebutwhatdothefarmersthinkofit
AT bouyerjeremy restrictedapplicationofinsecticidesapromisingtsetsecontroltechniquebutwhatdothefarmersthinkofit