Cargando…
A comment to the paper by Waltman et al., Scientometrics, 87, 467–481, 2011
In reaction to a previous critique (Opthof and Leydesdorff, J Informetr 4(3):423–430, 2010), the Center for Science and Technology Studies (CWTS) in Leiden proposed to change their old “crown” indicator in citation analysis into a new one. Waltman (Scientometrics 87:467–481, 2011a) argue that this c...
Autores principales: | Opthof, Tobias, Leydesdorff, Loet |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Netherlands
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3153660/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21949453 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0424-8 |
Ejemplares similares
-
A rejoinder on energy versus impact indicators
por: Leydesdorff, Loet, et al.
Publicado: (2011) -
The challenge of scientometrics: the development, measurement, and self-organization of scientific communications
por: Leydesdorff, Loet
Publicado: (2001) -
Count highly-cited papers instead of papers with h citations: use normalized citation counts and compare “like with like”!
por: Bornmann, Lutz, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Alternatives to the journal impact factor: I3 and the top-10% (or top-25%?) of the most-highly cited papers
por: Leydesdorff, Loet
Publicado: (2012) -
Comment on a paper by Maley et al.
por: Metcalf, M
Publicado: (1996)