Cargando…

Comparison of nebivolol and atenolol on blood pressure, blood sugar, and lipid profile in patients of essential hypertension

BACKGROUND: Nebivolol is a third-generation β-blocker, with highest β(1) selectivity and nitric-oxide-derived vasodilatation. It also exhibits antiproliferative and antioxidant property that has beneficial metabolic profile compared to second-generation β blockers like atenolol. This study was plann...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Badar, V.A., Hiware, Sachin K., Shrivastava, Meena P., Thawani, V.R., Hardas, M.M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3153709/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21845001
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0253-7613.83117
_version_ 1782209926243811328
author Badar, V.A.
Hiware, Sachin K.
Shrivastava, Meena P.
Thawani, V.R.
Hardas, M.M.
author_facet Badar, V.A.
Hiware, Sachin K.
Shrivastava, Meena P.
Thawani, V.R.
Hardas, M.M.
author_sort Badar, V.A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Nebivolol is a third-generation β-blocker, with highest β(1) selectivity and nitric-oxide-derived vasodilatation. It also exhibits antiproliferative and antioxidant property that has beneficial metabolic profile compared to second-generation β blockers like atenolol. This study was planned to study the comparative effects of nebivolol and atenolol on metabolic parameters in patients with essential hypertension. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective, randomized, parallel, open-label clinical study was carried out on patients with essential hypertension. The patients were randomly assigned to receive tablet atenolol (Group A) and nebivolol (Group B) for a period of 24 weeks. Investigations were carried out at baseline and at the end of study period, that is, 24 weeks. Out of 69 patients, 60 completed the study and the data was analyzed using student's t-test. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Atenolol and nebivolol both showed significant (P < 0.001) antihypertensive action after 24 weeks. Mean blood sugar and lipid profile were found to be significantly (P < 0.001) elevated after 24 weeks of treatment with atenolol but not with nebivolol. Heart rate was significantly (P < 0.001) decreased in both groups at 24 weeks. CONCLUSION: In view of metabolic adverse effects of atenolol, nebivolol is the better choice whenever β-blockers have to be used in essential hypertension.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3153709
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Medknow Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31537092011-08-15 Comparison of nebivolol and atenolol on blood pressure, blood sugar, and lipid profile in patients of essential hypertension Badar, V.A. Hiware, Sachin K. Shrivastava, Meena P. Thawani, V.R. Hardas, M.M. Indian J Pharmacol Research Article BACKGROUND: Nebivolol is a third-generation β-blocker, with highest β(1) selectivity and nitric-oxide-derived vasodilatation. It also exhibits antiproliferative and antioxidant property that has beneficial metabolic profile compared to second-generation β blockers like atenolol. This study was planned to study the comparative effects of nebivolol and atenolol on metabolic parameters in patients with essential hypertension. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective, randomized, parallel, open-label clinical study was carried out on patients with essential hypertension. The patients were randomly assigned to receive tablet atenolol (Group A) and nebivolol (Group B) for a period of 24 weeks. Investigations were carried out at baseline and at the end of study period, that is, 24 weeks. Out of 69 patients, 60 completed the study and the data was analyzed using student's t-test. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Atenolol and nebivolol both showed significant (P < 0.001) antihypertensive action after 24 weeks. Mean blood sugar and lipid profile were found to be significantly (P < 0.001) elevated after 24 weeks of treatment with atenolol but not with nebivolol. Heart rate was significantly (P < 0.001) decreased in both groups at 24 weeks. CONCLUSION: In view of metabolic adverse effects of atenolol, nebivolol is the better choice whenever β-blockers have to be used in essential hypertension. Medknow Publications 2011 /pmc/articles/PMC3153709/ /pubmed/21845001 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0253-7613.83117 Text en © Indian Journal of Pharmacology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Badar, V.A.
Hiware, Sachin K.
Shrivastava, Meena P.
Thawani, V.R.
Hardas, M.M.
Comparison of nebivolol and atenolol on blood pressure, blood sugar, and lipid profile in patients of essential hypertension
title Comparison of nebivolol and atenolol on blood pressure, blood sugar, and lipid profile in patients of essential hypertension
title_full Comparison of nebivolol and atenolol on blood pressure, blood sugar, and lipid profile in patients of essential hypertension
title_fullStr Comparison of nebivolol and atenolol on blood pressure, blood sugar, and lipid profile in patients of essential hypertension
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of nebivolol and atenolol on blood pressure, blood sugar, and lipid profile in patients of essential hypertension
title_short Comparison of nebivolol and atenolol on blood pressure, blood sugar, and lipid profile in patients of essential hypertension
title_sort comparison of nebivolol and atenolol on blood pressure, blood sugar, and lipid profile in patients of essential hypertension
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3153709/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21845001
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0253-7613.83117
work_keys_str_mv AT badarva comparisonofnebivololandatenololonbloodpressurebloodsugarandlipidprofileinpatientsofessentialhypertension
AT hiwaresachink comparisonofnebivololandatenololonbloodpressurebloodsugarandlipidprofileinpatientsofessentialhypertension
AT shrivastavameenap comparisonofnebivololandatenololonbloodpressurebloodsugarandlipidprofileinpatientsofessentialhypertension
AT thawanivr comparisonofnebivololandatenololonbloodpressurebloodsugarandlipidprofileinpatientsofessentialhypertension
AT hardasmm comparisonofnebivololandatenololonbloodpressurebloodsugarandlipidprofileinpatientsofessentialhypertension