Cargando…

Cognitive Processing in New and Practiced Discrete Keying Sequences

This study addresses the role of cognitive control in the initiation and execution of familiar and unfamiliar movement sequences. To become familiar with two movement sequences participants first practiced two discrete key press sequences by responding to two fixed series of 6-key specific stimuli....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Verwey, Willem B., Abrahamse, Elger L., de Kleine, Elian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Research Foundation 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3153751/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21833202
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00032
_version_ 1782209934852620288
author Verwey, Willem B.
Abrahamse, Elger L.
de Kleine, Elian
author_facet Verwey, Willem B.
Abrahamse, Elger L.
de Kleine, Elian
author_sort Verwey, Willem B.
collection PubMed
description This study addresses the role of cognitive control in the initiation and execution of familiar and unfamiliar movement sequences. To become familiar with two movement sequences participants first practiced two discrete key press sequences by responding to two fixed series of 6-key specific stimuli. In the ensuing test phase they executed these two familiar and also two unfamiliar keying sequences while there was a two-third chance a tone was presented together with one randomly selected key specific stimulus in each sequence. In the counting condition of the test phase participants counted the low pitched (i.e., target) tones. By and large the results support the dual processor model in which the prime role of the cognitive processor shifts from executing to initiating sequences while the gradual development of motor chunks allows a motor processor to execute the sequences. Yet, the results extend this simple model by suggesting that with little practice sequence execution is based also on some non-cognitive (perhaps associative) learning mechanism and, for some participants, on the use of explicit sequence knowledge. Also, after extensive practice the cognitive processor appears to still contribute to slower responses. The occurrence of long interkey intervals was replicated suggesting that fixed 6-key sequences include several motor chunks. Yet, no indication was found that the cognitive processor is responsible for concatenating these chunks.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3153751
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Frontiers Research Foundation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31537512011-08-10 Cognitive Processing in New and Practiced Discrete Keying Sequences Verwey, Willem B. Abrahamse, Elger L. de Kleine, Elian Front Psychol Psychology This study addresses the role of cognitive control in the initiation and execution of familiar and unfamiliar movement sequences. To become familiar with two movement sequences participants first practiced two discrete key press sequences by responding to two fixed series of 6-key specific stimuli. In the ensuing test phase they executed these two familiar and also two unfamiliar keying sequences while there was a two-third chance a tone was presented together with one randomly selected key specific stimulus in each sequence. In the counting condition of the test phase participants counted the low pitched (i.e., target) tones. By and large the results support the dual processor model in which the prime role of the cognitive processor shifts from executing to initiating sequences while the gradual development of motor chunks allows a motor processor to execute the sequences. Yet, the results extend this simple model by suggesting that with little practice sequence execution is based also on some non-cognitive (perhaps associative) learning mechanism and, for some participants, on the use of explicit sequence knowledge. Also, after extensive practice the cognitive processor appears to still contribute to slower responses. The occurrence of long interkey intervals was replicated suggesting that fixed 6-key sequences include several motor chunks. Yet, no indication was found that the cognitive processor is responsible for concatenating these chunks. Frontiers Research Foundation 2010-07-15 /pmc/articles/PMC3153751/ /pubmed/21833202 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00032 Text en Copyright © 2010 Verwey, Abrahamse and de Kleine. http://www.frontiersin.org/licenseagreement This is an open-access article subject to an exclusive license agreement between the authors and the Frontiers Research Foundation, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are credited.
spellingShingle Psychology
Verwey, Willem B.
Abrahamse, Elger L.
de Kleine, Elian
Cognitive Processing in New and Practiced Discrete Keying Sequences
title Cognitive Processing in New and Practiced Discrete Keying Sequences
title_full Cognitive Processing in New and Practiced Discrete Keying Sequences
title_fullStr Cognitive Processing in New and Practiced Discrete Keying Sequences
title_full_unstemmed Cognitive Processing in New and Practiced Discrete Keying Sequences
title_short Cognitive Processing in New and Practiced Discrete Keying Sequences
title_sort cognitive processing in new and practiced discrete keying sequences
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3153751/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21833202
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00032
work_keys_str_mv AT verweywillemb cognitiveprocessinginnewandpracticeddiscretekeyingsequences
AT abrahamseelgerl cognitiveprocessinginnewandpracticeddiscretekeyingsequences
AT dekleineelian cognitiveprocessinginnewandpracticeddiscretekeyingsequences