Cargando…

Two Independent Mechanisms for Motion-In-Depth Perception: Evidence from Individual Differences

Our forward-facing eyes allow us the advantage of binocular visual information: using the tiny differences between right and left eye views to learn about depth and location in three dimensions. Our visual systems also contain specialized mechanisms to detect motion-in-depth from binocular vision, b...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nefs, Harold T., O'Hare, Louise, Harris, Julie M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Research Foundation 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3153770/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21833221
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00155
_version_ 1782209939159121920
author Nefs, Harold T.
O'Hare, Louise
Harris, Julie M.
author_facet Nefs, Harold T.
O'Hare, Louise
Harris, Julie M.
author_sort Nefs, Harold T.
collection PubMed
description Our forward-facing eyes allow us the advantage of binocular visual information: using the tiny differences between right and left eye views to learn about depth and location in three dimensions. Our visual systems also contain specialized mechanisms to detect motion-in-depth from binocular vision, but the nature of these mechanisms remains controversial. Binocular motion-in-depth perception could theoretically be based on first detecting binocular disparity and then monitoring how it changes over time. The alternative is to monitor the motion in the right and left eye separately and then compare these motion signals. Here we used an individual differences approach to test whether the two sources of information are processed via dissociated mechanisms, and to measure the relative importance of those mechanisms. Our results suggest the existence of two distinct mechanisms, each contributing to the perception of motion-in-depth in most observers. Additionally, for the first time, we demonstrate the relative prevalence of the two mechanisms within a normal population. In general, visual systems appear to rely mostly on the mechanism sensitive to changing binocular disparity, but perception of motion-in-depth is augmented by the presence of a less sensitive mechanism that uses interocular velocity differences. Occasionally, we find observers with the opposite pattern of sensitivity. More generally this work showcases the power of the individual differences approach in studying the functional organization of cognitive systems.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3153770
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Frontiers Research Foundation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31537702011-08-10 Two Independent Mechanisms for Motion-In-Depth Perception: Evidence from Individual Differences Nefs, Harold T. O'Hare, Louise Harris, Julie M. Front Psychol Psychology Our forward-facing eyes allow us the advantage of binocular visual information: using the tiny differences between right and left eye views to learn about depth and location in three dimensions. Our visual systems also contain specialized mechanisms to detect motion-in-depth from binocular vision, but the nature of these mechanisms remains controversial. Binocular motion-in-depth perception could theoretically be based on first detecting binocular disparity and then monitoring how it changes over time. The alternative is to monitor the motion in the right and left eye separately and then compare these motion signals. Here we used an individual differences approach to test whether the two sources of information are processed via dissociated mechanisms, and to measure the relative importance of those mechanisms. Our results suggest the existence of two distinct mechanisms, each contributing to the perception of motion-in-depth in most observers. Additionally, for the first time, we demonstrate the relative prevalence of the two mechanisms within a normal population. In general, visual systems appear to rely mostly on the mechanism sensitive to changing binocular disparity, but perception of motion-in-depth is augmented by the presence of a less sensitive mechanism that uses interocular velocity differences. Occasionally, we find observers with the opposite pattern of sensitivity. More generally this work showcases the power of the individual differences approach in studying the functional organization of cognitive systems. Frontiers Research Foundation 2010-10-12 /pmc/articles/PMC3153770/ /pubmed/21833221 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00155 Text en Copyright © 2010 Nefs, O'Hare and Harris. http://www.frontiersin.org/licenseagreement This is an open-access article subject to an exclusive license agreement between the authors and the Frontiers Research Foundation, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are credited.
spellingShingle Psychology
Nefs, Harold T.
O'Hare, Louise
Harris, Julie M.
Two Independent Mechanisms for Motion-In-Depth Perception: Evidence from Individual Differences
title Two Independent Mechanisms for Motion-In-Depth Perception: Evidence from Individual Differences
title_full Two Independent Mechanisms for Motion-In-Depth Perception: Evidence from Individual Differences
title_fullStr Two Independent Mechanisms for Motion-In-Depth Perception: Evidence from Individual Differences
title_full_unstemmed Two Independent Mechanisms for Motion-In-Depth Perception: Evidence from Individual Differences
title_short Two Independent Mechanisms for Motion-In-Depth Perception: Evidence from Individual Differences
title_sort two independent mechanisms for motion-in-depth perception: evidence from individual differences
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3153770/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21833221
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00155
work_keys_str_mv AT nefsharoldt twoindependentmechanismsformotionindepthperceptionevidencefromindividualdifferences
AT oharelouise twoindependentmechanismsformotionindepthperceptionevidencefromindividualdifferences
AT harrisjuliem twoindependentmechanismsformotionindepthperceptionevidencefromindividualdifferences