Cargando…
Do Science and Common Wisdom Collide or Coincide in their Understanding of Relational Aggression?
Relational aggression is a form of covert or indirect aggression or bullying in which harm is caused through damage to relationships or social status within a group, rather than through physical violence. We compare findings from empirical research into relational aggression with the depictions, int...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Research Foundation
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3153789/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21833240 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00179 |
_version_ | 1782209943397466112 |
---|---|
author | Doyle, Heather S. Mcloughlin, Caven S. |
author_facet | Doyle, Heather S. Mcloughlin, Caven S. |
author_sort | Doyle, Heather S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Relational aggression is a form of covert or indirect aggression or bullying in which harm is caused through damage to relationships or social status within a group, rather than through physical violence. We compare findings from empirical research into relational aggression with the depictions, interpretations and interventions described in trade-books and popular media dealing with that same topic. Relational aggression is more common and more studied among girls than boys and is popularly described as synonymous with “mean-girl” behaviors. We investigate the degree that popular trade books and movies accurately portray findings from researched investigations including the incidence and indicators of the condition and its remedies. We determine that there is a great deal of similarity between these two sources in how relational aggression is understood and how it may be treated. The concurrence across both dissemination formats reflects terminology and definitions, the harmful effects of relational aggression, the gender-specific nature of the condition to women and girls, its age of occurrence, the impact of parenting styles, its relationship to girls’ social competence, and nature of its expression through non-physical means. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3153789 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | Frontiers Research Foundation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-31537892011-08-10 Do Science and Common Wisdom Collide or Coincide in their Understanding of Relational Aggression? Doyle, Heather S. Mcloughlin, Caven S. Front Psychol Psychology Relational aggression is a form of covert or indirect aggression or bullying in which harm is caused through damage to relationships or social status within a group, rather than through physical violence. We compare findings from empirical research into relational aggression with the depictions, interpretations and interventions described in trade-books and popular media dealing with that same topic. Relational aggression is more common and more studied among girls than boys and is popularly described as synonymous with “mean-girl” behaviors. We investigate the degree that popular trade books and movies accurately portray findings from researched investigations including the incidence and indicators of the condition and its remedies. We determine that there is a great deal of similarity between these two sources in how relational aggression is understood and how it may be treated. The concurrence across both dissemination formats reflects terminology and definitions, the harmful effects of relational aggression, the gender-specific nature of the condition to women and girls, its age of occurrence, the impact of parenting styles, its relationship to girls’ social competence, and nature of its expression through non-physical means. Frontiers Research Foundation 2010-12-06 /pmc/articles/PMC3153789/ /pubmed/21833240 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00179 Text en Copyright © 2010 Doyle and Mcloughlin. http://www.frontiersin.org/licenseagreement This is an open-access article subject to an exclusive license agreement between the authors and the Frontiers Research Foundation, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Doyle, Heather S. Mcloughlin, Caven S. Do Science and Common Wisdom Collide or Coincide in their Understanding of Relational Aggression? |
title | Do Science and Common Wisdom Collide or Coincide in their Understanding of Relational Aggression? |
title_full | Do Science and Common Wisdom Collide or Coincide in their Understanding of Relational Aggression? |
title_fullStr | Do Science and Common Wisdom Collide or Coincide in their Understanding of Relational Aggression? |
title_full_unstemmed | Do Science and Common Wisdom Collide or Coincide in their Understanding of Relational Aggression? |
title_short | Do Science and Common Wisdom Collide or Coincide in their Understanding of Relational Aggression? |
title_sort | do science and common wisdom collide or coincide in their understanding of relational aggression? |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3153789/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21833240 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00179 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT doyleheathers doscienceandcommonwisdomcollideorcoincideintheirunderstandingofrelationalaggression AT mcloughlincavens doscienceandcommonwisdomcollideorcoincideintheirunderstandingofrelationalaggression |