Cargando…

Consciousness and Attention: On Sufficiency and Necessity

Recent research has slowly corroded a belief that selective attention and consciousness are so tightly entangled that they cannot be individually examined. In this review, we summarize psychophysical and neurophysiological evidence for a dissociation between top-down attention and consciousness. The...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van Boxtel, Jeroen J. A., Tsuchiya, Naotsugu, Koch, Christof
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Research Foundation 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3153822/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21833272
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00217
_version_ 1782209950739595264
author van Boxtel, Jeroen J. A.
Tsuchiya, Naotsugu
Koch, Christof
author_facet van Boxtel, Jeroen J. A.
Tsuchiya, Naotsugu
Koch, Christof
author_sort van Boxtel, Jeroen J. A.
collection PubMed
description Recent research has slowly corroded a belief that selective attention and consciousness are so tightly entangled that they cannot be individually examined. In this review, we summarize psychophysical and neurophysiological evidence for a dissociation between top-down attention and consciousness. The evidence includes recent findings that show subjects can attend to perceptually invisible objects. More contentious is the finding that subjects can become conscious of an isolated object, or the gist of the scene in the near absence of top-down attention; we critically re-examine the possibility of “complete” absence of top-down attention. We also cover the recent flurry of studies that utilized independent manipulation of attention and consciousness. These studies have shown paradoxical effects of attention, including examples where top-down attention and consciousness have opposing effects, leading us to strengthen and revise our previous views. Neuroimaging studies with EEG, MEG, and fMRI are uncovering the distinct neuronal correlates of selective attention and consciousness in dissociative paradigms. These findings point to a functional dissociation: attention as analyzer and consciousness as synthesizer. Separating the effects of selective visual attention from those of visual consciousness is of paramount importance to untangle the neural substrates of consciousness from those for attention.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3153822
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Frontiers Research Foundation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31538222011-08-10 Consciousness and Attention: On Sufficiency and Necessity van Boxtel, Jeroen J. A. Tsuchiya, Naotsugu Koch, Christof Front Psychol Psychology Recent research has slowly corroded a belief that selective attention and consciousness are so tightly entangled that they cannot be individually examined. In this review, we summarize psychophysical and neurophysiological evidence for a dissociation between top-down attention and consciousness. The evidence includes recent findings that show subjects can attend to perceptually invisible objects. More contentious is the finding that subjects can become conscious of an isolated object, or the gist of the scene in the near absence of top-down attention; we critically re-examine the possibility of “complete” absence of top-down attention. We also cover the recent flurry of studies that utilized independent manipulation of attention and consciousness. These studies have shown paradoxical effects of attention, including examples where top-down attention and consciousness have opposing effects, leading us to strengthen and revise our previous views. Neuroimaging studies with EEG, MEG, and fMRI are uncovering the distinct neuronal correlates of selective attention and consciousness in dissociative paradigms. These findings point to a functional dissociation: attention as analyzer and consciousness as synthesizer. Separating the effects of selective visual attention from those of visual consciousness is of paramount importance to untangle the neural substrates of consciousness from those for attention. Frontiers Research Foundation 2010-12-20 /pmc/articles/PMC3153822/ /pubmed/21833272 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00217 Text en Copyright © 2010 van Boxtel, Tsuchiya and Koch. http://www.frontiersin.org/licenseagreement This is an open-access article subject to an exclusive license agreement between the authors and the Frontiers Research Foundation, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are credited.
spellingShingle Psychology
van Boxtel, Jeroen J. A.
Tsuchiya, Naotsugu
Koch, Christof
Consciousness and Attention: On Sufficiency and Necessity
title Consciousness and Attention: On Sufficiency and Necessity
title_full Consciousness and Attention: On Sufficiency and Necessity
title_fullStr Consciousness and Attention: On Sufficiency and Necessity
title_full_unstemmed Consciousness and Attention: On Sufficiency and Necessity
title_short Consciousness and Attention: On Sufficiency and Necessity
title_sort consciousness and attention: on sufficiency and necessity
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3153822/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21833272
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00217
work_keys_str_mv AT vanboxteljeroenja consciousnessandattentiononsufficiencyandnecessity
AT tsuchiyanaotsugu consciousnessandattentiononsufficiencyandnecessity
AT kochchristof consciousnessandattentiononsufficiencyandnecessity