Cargando…
Orthographic Influences When Processing Spoken Pseudowords: Theoretical Implications
When we hear an utterance, is the orthographic representation of that utterance activated when it is being processed? Orthographic influences have been previously examined in relation to spoken pseudoword processing in three different paradigms. Unlike real word processing, no orthographic effects w...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Research Foundation
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3153883/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21886628 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00140 |
_version_ | 1782209959799291904 |
---|---|
author | Taft, Marcus |
author_facet | Taft, Marcus |
author_sort | Taft, Marcus |
collection | PubMed |
description | When we hear an utterance, is the orthographic representation of that utterance activated when it is being processed? Orthographic influences have been previously examined in relation to spoken pseudoword processing in three different paradigms. Unlike real word processing, no orthographic effects with pseudowords have been observed in a phoneme goodness ratings task, and there is a mixed outcome in studies looking for spelling–sound consistency effects. In contrast, the orthography of spoken pseudohomographs has been shown to be activated, given that they prime their homographic base word. Explanations are sought for the findings in these three paradigms, leading to an exploration of theoretical models of spoken word recognition. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3153883 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | Frontiers Research Foundation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-31538832011-08-31 Orthographic Influences When Processing Spoken Pseudowords: Theoretical Implications Taft, Marcus Front Psychol Psychology When we hear an utterance, is the orthographic representation of that utterance activated when it is being processed? Orthographic influences have been previously examined in relation to spoken pseudoword processing in three different paradigms. Unlike real word processing, no orthographic effects with pseudowords have been observed in a phoneme goodness ratings task, and there is a mixed outcome in studies looking for spelling–sound consistency effects. In contrast, the orthography of spoken pseudohomographs has been shown to be activated, given that they prime their homographic base word. Explanations are sought for the findings in these three paradigms, leading to an exploration of theoretical models of spoken word recognition. Frontiers Research Foundation 2011-06-28 /pmc/articles/PMC3153883/ /pubmed/21886628 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00140 Text en Copyright © 2011 Taft. http://www.frontiersin.org/licenseagreement This is an open-access article subject to a non-exclusive license between the authors and Frontiers Media SA, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in other forums, provided the original authors and source are credited and other Frontiers conditions are complied with. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Taft, Marcus Orthographic Influences When Processing Spoken Pseudowords: Theoretical Implications |
title | Orthographic Influences When Processing Spoken Pseudowords: Theoretical Implications |
title_full | Orthographic Influences When Processing Spoken Pseudowords: Theoretical Implications |
title_fullStr | Orthographic Influences When Processing Spoken Pseudowords: Theoretical Implications |
title_full_unstemmed | Orthographic Influences When Processing Spoken Pseudowords: Theoretical Implications |
title_short | Orthographic Influences When Processing Spoken Pseudowords: Theoretical Implications |
title_sort | orthographic influences when processing spoken pseudowords: theoretical implications |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3153883/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21886628 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00140 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT taftmarcus orthographicinfluenceswhenprocessingspokenpseudowordstheoreticalimplications |