Cargando…
Strength of Word-Specific Neural Memory Traces Assessed Electrophysiologically
Memory traces for words are frequently conceptualized neurobiologically as networks of neurons interconnected via reciprocal links developed through associative learning in the process of language acquisition. Neurophysiological reflection of activation of such memory traces has been reported using...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3154264/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21853063 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0022999 |
_version_ | 1782209997941243904 |
---|---|
author | Alexandrov, Alexander A. Boricheva, Daria O. Pulvermüller, Friedemann Shtyrov, Yury |
author_facet | Alexandrov, Alexander A. Boricheva, Daria O. Pulvermüller, Friedemann Shtyrov, Yury |
author_sort | Alexandrov, Alexander A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Memory traces for words are frequently conceptualized neurobiologically as networks of neurons interconnected via reciprocal links developed through associative learning in the process of language acquisition. Neurophysiological reflection of activation of such memory traces has been reported using the mismatch negativity brain potential (MMN), which demonstrates an enhanced response to meaningful words over meaningless items. This enhancement is believed to be generated by the activation of strongly intraconnected long-term memory circuits for words that can be automatically triggered by spoken linguistic input and that are absent for unfamiliar phonological stimuli. This conceptual framework critically predicts different amounts of activation depending on the strength of the word's lexical representation in the brain. The frequent use of words should lead to more strongly connected representations, whereas less frequent items would be associated with more weakly linked circuits. A word with higher frequency of occurrence in the subject's language should therefore lead to a more pronounced lexical MMN response than its low-frequency counterpart. We tested this prediction by comparing the event-related potentials elicited by low- and high-frequency words in a passive oddball paradigm; physical stimulus contrasts were kept identical. We found that, consistent with our prediction, presenting the high-frequency stimulus led to a significantly more pronounced MMN response relative to the low-frequency one, a finding that is highly similar to previously reported MMN enhancement to words over meaningless pseudowords. Furthermore, activation elicited by the higher-frequency word peaked earlier relative to low-frequency one, suggesting more rapid access to frequently used lexical entries. These results lend further support to the above view on word memory traces as strongly connected assemblies of neurons. The speed and magnitude of their activation appears to be linked to the strength of internal connections in a memory circuit, which is in turn determined by the everyday use of language elements. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3154264 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-31542642011-08-18 Strength of Word-Specific Neural Memory Traces Assessed Electrophysiologically Alexandrov, Alexander A. Boricheva, Daria O. Pulvermüller, Friedemann Shtyrov, Yury PLoS One Research Article Memory traces for words are frequently conceptualized neurobiologically as networks of neurons interconnected via reciprocal links developed through associative learning in the process of language acquisition. Neurophysiological reflection of activation of such memory traces has been reported using the mismatch negativity brain potential (MMN), which demonstrates an enhanced response to meaningful words over meaningless items. This enhancement is believed to be generated by the activation of strongly intraconnected long-term memory circuits for words that can be automatically triggered by spoken linguistic input and that are absent for unfamiliar phonological stimuli. This conceptual framework critically predicts different amounts of activation depending on the strength of the word's lexical representation in the brain. The frequent use of words should lead to more strongly connected representations, whereas less frequent items would be associated with more weakly linked circuits. A word with higher frequency of occurrence in the subject's language should therefore lead to a more pronounced lexical MMN response than its low-frequency counterpart. We tested this prediction by comparing the event-related potentials elicited by low- and high-frequency words in a passive oddball paradigm; physical stimulus contrasts were kept identical. We found that, consistent with our prediction, presenting the high-frequency stimulus led to a significantly more pronounced MMN response relative to the low-frequency one, a finding that is highly similar to previously reported MMN enhancement to words over meaningless pseudowords. Furthermore, activation elicited by the higher-frequency word peaked earlier relative to low-frequency one, suggesting more rapid access to frequently used lexical entries. These results lend further support to the above view on word memory traces as strongly connected assemblies of neurons. The speed and magnitude of their activation appears to be linked to the strength of internal connections in a memory circuit, which is in turn determined by the everyday use of language elements. Public Library of Science 2011-08-10 /pmc/articles/PMC3154264/ /pubmed/21853063 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0022999 Text en Alexandrov et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Alexandrov, Alexander A. Boricheva, Daria O. Pulvermüller, Friedemann Shtyrov, Yury Strength of Word-Specific Neural Memory Traces Assessed Electrophysiologically |
title | Strength of Word-Specific Neural Memory Traces Assessed Electrophysiologically |
title_full | Strength of Word-Specific Neural Memory Traces Assessed Electrophysiologically |
title_fullStr | Strength of Word-Specific Neural Memory Traces Assessed Electrophysiologically |
title_full_unstemmed | Strength of Word-Specific Neural Memory Traces Assessed Electrophysiologically |
title_short | Strength of Word-Specific Neural Memory Traces Assessed Electrophysiologically |
title_sort | strength of word-specific neural memory traces assessed electrophysiologically |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3154264/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21853063 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0022999 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT alexandrovalexandera strengthofwordspecificneuralmemorytracesassessedelectrophysiologically AT borichevadariao strengthofwordspecificneuralmemorytracesassessedelectrophysiologically AT pulvermullerfriedemann strengthofwordspecificneuralmemorytracesassessedelectrophysiologically AT shtyrovyury strengthofwordspecificneuralmemorytracesassessedelectrophysiologically |