Cargando…

TCDD and cancer: A critical review of epidemiologic studies

The authors reviewed the epidemiologic studies on exposure to 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) and cancer risk, published since the last full-scale review made by the International Agency for Research on Cancer Monographs program in 1997. The update of a cohort of US herbicide producers ge...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Boffetta, Paolo, Mundt, Kenneth A, Adami, Hans-Olov, Cole, Philip, Mandel, Jack S
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Informa Healthcare 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3154583/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21718216
http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/10408444.2011.560141
_version_ 1782210033417715712
author Boffetta, Paolo
Mundt, Kenneth A
Adami, Hans-Olov
Cole, Philip
Mandel, Jack S
author_facet Boffetta, Paolo
Mundt, Kenneth A
Adami, Hans-Olov
Cole, Philip
Mandel, Jack S
author_sort Boffetta, Paolo
collection PubMed
description The authors reviewed the epidemiologic studies on exposure to 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) and cancer risk, published since the last full-scale review made by the International Agency for Research on Cancer Monographs program in 1997. The update of a cohort of US herbicide producers generated negative results overall; the internal analysis provided evidence of an increased “all-cancer” risk in the highest exposure category, with a statistically significant exposure-response association in some of the many analyses performed.The update of a similar Dutch cohort did not confirm the previously observed association with TCDD exposure. The updated surveillance of the Seveso population provided evidence of increased all-cancer mortality 15-20 years after exposure among those living in the most contaminated area but might also reflect random variation, as overall excesses in the most recent follow-up were not observed. Corresponding data on cancer incidence offer little support to the mortality results. Updated results from cohort studies of Vietnam veterans potentially exposed to TCDD did not consistently suggest an increased risk of cancer. Results of additional, smaller studies of other occupational groups potentially exposed to TCDD, and of community-based case-control studies, did not provide consistent evidence of an increased cancer risk. In conclusion, recent epidemiological evidence falls far short of conclusively demonstrating a causal link between TCDD exposure and cancer risk in humans. The emphasis on results for overall cancer risk—rather than risk for specific neoplasms—is notjustified on epidemiologic grounds and is nota reason for ignoring the weaknesses of the available evidence.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3154583
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Informa Healthcare
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31545832011-08-12 TCDD and cancer: A critical review of epidemiologic studies Boffetta, Paolo Mundt, Kenneth A Adami, Hans-Olov Cole, Philip Mandel, Jack S Crit Rev Toxicol Review Article The authors reviewed the epidemiologic studies on exposure to 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) and cancer risk, published since the last full-scale review made by the International Agency for Research on Cancer Monographs program in 1997. The update of a cohort of US herbicide producers generated negative results overall; the internal analysis provided evidence of an increased “all-cancer” risk in the highest exposure category, with a statistically significant exposure-response association in some of the many analyses performed.The update of a similar Dutch cohort did not confirm the previously observed association with TCDD exposure. The updated surveillance of the Seveso population provided evidence of increased all-cancer mortality 15-20 years after exposure among those living in the most contaminated area but might also reflect random variation, as overall excesses in the most recent follow-up were not observed. Corresponding data on cancer incidence offer little support to the mortality results. Updated results from cohort studies of Vietnam veterans potentially exposed to TCDD did not consistently suggest an increased risk of cancer. Results of additional, smaller studies of other occupational groups potentially exposed to TCDD, and of community-based case-control studies, did not provide consistent evidence of an increased cancer risk. In conclusion, recent epidemiological evidence falls far short of conclusively demonstrating a causal link between TCDD exposure and cancer risk in humans. The emphasis on results for overall cancer risk—rather than risk for specific neoplasms—is notjustified on epidemiologic grounds and is nota reason for ignoring the weaknesses of the available evidence. Informa Healthcare 2011-08 2011-07-01 /pmc/articles/PMC3154583/ /pubmed/21718216 http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/10408444.2011.560141 Text en © 2011 Informa Healthcare USA, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Supplemental Terms and Conditions for iOpenAccess articles published in Informa Healthcare journals (http://www.informaworld.com/mpp/uploads/iopenaccess_tcs.pdf) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Boffetta, Paolo
Mundt, Kenneth A
Adami, Hans-Olov
Cole, Philip
Mandel, Jack S
TCDD and cancer: A critical review of epidemiologic studies
title TCDD and cancer: A critical review of epidemiologic studies
title_full TCDD and cancer: A critical review of epidemiologic studies
title_fullStr TCDD and cancer: A critical review of epidemiologic studies
title_full_unstemmed TCDD and cancer: A critical review of epidemiologic studies
title_short TCDD and cancer: A critical review of epidemiologic studies
title_sort tcdd and cancer: a critical review of epidemiologic studies
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3154583/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21718216
http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/10408444.2011.560141
work_keys_str_mv AT boffettapaolo tcddandcanceracriticalreviewofepidemiologicstudies
AT mundtkennetha tcddandcanceracriticalreviewofepidemiologicstudies
AT adamihansolov tcddandcanceracriticalreviewofepidemiologicstudies
AT colephilip tcddandcanceracriticalreviewofepidemiologicstudies
AT mandeljacks tcddandcanceracriticalreviewofepidemiologicstudies