Cargando…

Oral misoprostol for preventing postpartum haemorrhage in home births in rural Bangladesh: how effective is it?

AIMS: Evidence exists about prevention of postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) by oral administration of misoprostol in low-income countries, but effectiveness of prevention by lay community health workers (CHW) is not sufficient. This study aimed to investigate whether a single dose (400 µg) of oral misopr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nasreen, Hashima-E-, Nahar, Shamsun, Al Mamun, Mahfuz, Afsana, Kaosar, Byass, Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: CoAction Publishing 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3154679/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21845143
http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/gha.v4i0.7017
_version_ 1782210034592120832
author Nasreen, Hashima-E-
Nahar, Shamsun
Al Mamun, Mahfuz
Afsana, Kaosar
Byass, Peter
author_facet Nasreen, Hashima-E-
Nahar, Shamsun
Al Mamun, Mahfuz
Afsana, Kaosar
Byass, Peter
author_sort Nasreen, Hashima-E-
collection PubMed
description AIMS: Evidence exists about prevention of postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) by oral administration of misoprostol in low-income countries, but effectiveness of prevention by lay community health workers (CHW) is not sufficient. This study aimed to investigate whether a single dose (400 µg) of oral misoprostol could prevent PPH in a community home-birth setting and to assess its acceptability and feasibility among rural Bangladeshi women. METHODS: This quasi-experimental trial was conducted among 2,017 rural women who had home deliveries between November 2009 and February 2010 in two rural districts of northern Bangladesh. In the intervention district 1,009 women received 400 µg of misoprostol immediately after giving birth by the lay CHWs, and in the control district 1,008 women were followed after giving birth with no specific intervention against PPH. Primary PPH (within 24 hours) was measured by women's self-reported subjective measures of the normality of blood loss using the ‘cultural consensus model.’ Baseline data provided socio-economic, reproductive, obstetric, and bleeding disorder information. FINDINGS: The incidence of primary PPH was found to be lower in the intervention group (1.6%) than the control group (6.2%) (p<0.001). Misoprostol provided 81% protection (RR: 0.19; 95% CI: 0.08–0.48) against developing primary PPH. The proportion of retained and manually removed placentae was found to be higher in the control group compared to the intervention group. Women in the control group were more likely to need an emergency referral to a higher level facility and blood transfusion than the intervention group. Unexpectedly few women experienced transient side effects of misoprostol. Eighty-seven percent of the women were willing to use the drug in future pregnancy and would recommend to other pregnant women. CONCLUSION: Community-based distribution of oral misoprostol (400 µg) by CHW appeared to be effective, safe, acceptable, and feasible in reducing the incidence of PPH in rural areas of Bangladesh. This strategy should be scaled up across the country where access to skilled attendance is limited.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3154679
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher CoAction Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31546792011-08-15 Oral misoprostol for preventing postpartum haemorrhage in home births in rural Bangladesh: how effective is it? Nasreen, Hashima-E- Nahar, Shamsun Al Mamun, Mahfuz Afsana, Kaosar Byass, Peter Glob Health Action Original Article AIMS: Evidence exists about prevention of postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) by oral administration of misoprostol in low-income countries, but effectiveness of prevention by lay community health workers (CHW) is not sufficient. This study aimed to investigate whether a single dose (400 µg) of oral misoprostol could prevent PPH in a community home-birth setting and to assess its acceptability and feasibility among rural Bangladeshi women. METHODS: This quasi-experimental trial was conducted among 2,017 rural women who had home deliveries between November 2009 and February 2010 in two rural districts of northern Bangladesh. In the intervention district 1,009 women received 400 µg of misoprostol immediately after giving birth by the lay CHWs, and in the control district 1,008 women were followed after giving birth with no specific intervention against PPH. Primary PPH (within 24 hours) was measured by women's self-reported subjective measures of the normality of blood loss using the ‘cultural consensus model.’ Baseline data provided socio-economic, reproductive, obstetric, and bleeding disorder information. FINDINGS: The incidence of primary PPH was found to be lower in the intervention group (1.6%) than the control group (6.2%) (p<0.001). Misoprostol provided 81% protection (RR: 0.19; 95% CI: 0.08–0.48) against developing primary PPH. The proportion of retained and manually removed placentae was found to be higher in the control group compared to the intervention group. Women in the control group were more likely to need an emergency referral to a higher level facility and blood transfusion than the intervention group. Unexpectedly few women experienced transient side effects of misoprostol. Eighty-seven percent of the women were willing to use the drug in future pregnancy and would recommend to other pregnant women. CONCLUSION: Community-based distribution of oral misoprostol (400 µg) by CHW appeared to be effective, safe, acceptable, and feasible in reducing the incidence of PPH in rural areas of Bangladesh. This strategy should be scaled up across the country where access to skilled attendance is limited. CoAction Publishing 2011-08-10 /pmc/articles/PMC3154679/ /pubmed/21845143 http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/gha.v4i0.7017 Text en © 2011 Hashima-E-Nasreen et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 Unported License, permitting all non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Nasreen, Hashima-E-
Nahar, Shamsun
Al Mamun, Mahfuz
Afsana, Kaosar
Byass, Peter
Oral misoprostol for preventing postpartum haemorrhage in home births in rural Bangladesh: how effective is it?
title Oral misoprostol for preventing postpartum haemorrhage in home births in rural Bangladesh: how effective is it?
title_full Oral misoprostol for preventing postpartum haemorrhage in home births in rural Bangladesh: how effective is it?
title_fullStr Oral misoprostol for preventing postpartum haemorrhage in home births in rural Bangladesh: how effective is it?
title_full_unstemmed Oral misoprostol for preventing postpartum haemorrhage in home births in rural Bangladesh: how effective is it?
title_short Oral misoprostol for preventing postpartum haemorrhage in home births in rural Bangladesh: how effective is it?
title_sort oral misoprostol for preventing postpartum haemorrhage in home births in rural bangladesh: how effective is it?
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3154679/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21845143
http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/gha.v4i0.7017
work_keys_str_mv AT nasreenhashimae oralmisoprostolforpreventingpostpartumhaemorrhageinhomebirthsinruralbangladeshhoweffectiveisit
AT naharshamsun oralmisoprostolforpreventingpostpartumhaemorrhageinhomebirthsinruralbangladeshhoweffectiveisit
AT almamunmahfuz oralmisoprostolforpreventingpostpartumhaemorrhageinhomebirthsinruralbangladeshhoweffectiveisit
AT afsanakaosar oralmisoprostolforpreventingpostpartumhaemorrhageinhomebirthsinruralbangladeshhoweffectiveisit
AT byasspeter oralmisoprostolforpreventingpostpartumhaemorrhageinhomebirthsinruralbangladeshhoweffectiveisit