How can continuing professional development better promote shared decision-making? Perspectives from an international collaboration

BACKGROUND: Shared decision-making is not widely implemented in healthcare. We aimed to set a research agenda about promoting shared decision-making through continuing professional development. METHODS: Thirty-six participants met for two days. RESULTS: Participants suggested ways to improve an envi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Légaré, France, Bekker, Hilary, Desroches, Sophie, Drolet, Renée, Politi, Mary C, Stacey, Dawn, Borduas, Francine, Cheater, Francine M, Cornuz, Jacques, Coutu, Marie-France, Ferdjaoui-Moumjid, Nora, Griffiths, Frances, Härter, Martin, Jacques, André, Krones, Tanja, Labrecque, Michel, Neely, Claire, Rodriguez, Charo, Sargeant, Joan, Schuerman, Janet S, Sullivan, Mark D
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Meeting Report
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3154854/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21729310
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-6-68
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Shared decision-making is not widely implemented in healthcare. We aimed to set a research agenda about promoting shared decision-making through continuing professional development. METHODS: Thirty-six participants met for two days. RESULTS: Participants suggested ways to improve an environmental scan that had inventoried 53 shared decision-making training programs from 14 countries. Their proposed research agenda included reaching an international consensus on shared decision-making competencies and creating a framework for accrediting continuing professional development initiatives in shared decision-making. CONCLUSIONS: Variability in shared decision-making training programs showcases the need for quality assurance frameworks.

Ejemplares similares