Cargando…

Visual perception changes and optical stability after intracorneal ring segment implantation: comparison between 3 months and 1 year after surgery

PURPOSE: To prospectively evaluate intracorneal ring segment (ICRS) implantation on quality of life (QoL) of patients with keratoconus changes and identify factors responsible. METHODS: Sixty-nine eyes of 42 keratoconus patients were implanted with the Keraring (Mediphacos, Belo Horizonte, Brazil)....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de Freitas Santos Paranhos, Juliane, Ávila, Marcos Pereira, Paranhos, Augusto, Schor, Paulo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3155269/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21847336
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S23147
_version_ 1782210100372439040
author de Freitas Santos Paranhos, Juliane
Ávila, Marcos Pereira
Paranhos, Augusto
Schor, Paulo
author_facet de Freitas Santos Paranhos, Juliane
Ávila, Marcos Pereira
Paranhos, Augusto
Schor, Paulo
author_sort de Freitas Santos Paranhos, Juliane
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To prospectively evaluate intracorneal ring segment (ICRS) implantation on quality of life (QoL) of patients with keratoconus changes and identify factors responsible. METHODS: Sixty-nine eyes of 42 keratoconus patients were implanted with the Keraring (Mediphacos, Belo Horizonte, Brazil). Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), refraction, and steep keratometry were analyzed 3 months and 1 year after surgery. All patients self-administered the National Eye Institute Refractive Error Quality of life instrument at 2 time points: after having worn best correction for at least 30 days since evaluation (mean 4 months after surgery) and 1 year after surgery. To analyze if the use of the appropriate correction at 1 year follow up had any impact on visual acuity and V-QoL, patients were divided into 2 groups: group A (appropriate correction) and B (not appropriate correction). RESULTS: After 1 year, QoL changes related to scales ‘clarity of vision’, ‘near vision’, and ‘far vision’. Keratometric values, sphere, and spherical equivalent did not differ significantly between 3 months and 1 year postoperative. Cylinder increase was statistically but not clinically significant. Binocular BCVA did not change 1 year after surgery in group A and showed a clinically significant impairment in group B. A year after surgery, 18 patients did not use correction suggested by a physician 3 months after surgery. QoL was not statistically different 1 year after surgery between group A and group B. CONCLUSION: Our findings show that the way keratoconic patients see is difficult to analyze using only quantitative and 1-visit metrics. They highlight the importance of patients’ self perception and performing longitudinal analysis to consider neural compensation to optical changes from surgery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3155269
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31552692011-08-16 Visual perception changes and optical stability after intracorneal ring segment implantation: comparison between 3 months and 1 year after surgery de Freitas Santos Paranhos, Juliane Ávila, Marcos Pereira Paranhos, Augusto Schor, Paulo Clin Ophthalmol Original Research PURPOSE: To prospectively evaluate intracorneal ring segment (ICRS) implantation on quality of life (QoL) of patients with keratoconus changes and identify factors responsible. METHODS: Sixty-nine eyes of 42 keratoconus patients were implanted with the Keraring (Mediphacos, Belo Horizonte, Brazil). Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), refraction, and steep keratometry were analyzed 3 months and 1 year after surgery. All patients self-administered the National Eye Institute Refractive Error Quality of life instrument at 2 time points: after having worn best correction for at least 30 days since evaluation (mean 4 months after surgery) and 1 year after surgery. To analyze if the use of the appropriate correction at 1 year follow up had any impact on visual acuity and V-QoL, patients were divided into 2 groups: group A (appropriate correction) and B (not appropriate correction). RESULTS: After 1 year, QoL changes related to scales ‘clarity of vision’, ‘near vision’, and ‘far vision’. Keratometric values, sphere, and spherical equivalent did not differ significantly between 3 months and 1 year postoperative. Cylinder increase was statistically but not clinically significant. Binocular BCVA did not change 1 year after surgery in group A and showed a clinically significant impairment in group B. A year after surgery, 18 patients did not use correction suggested by a physician 3 months after surgery. QoL was not statistically different 1 year after surgery between group A and group B. CONCLUSION: Our findings show that the way keratoconic patients see is difficult to analyze using only quantitative and 1-visit metrics. They highlight the importance of patients’ self perception and performing longitudinal analysis to consider neural compensation to optical changes from surgery. Dove Medical Press 2011 2011-07-29 /pmc/articles/PMC3155269/ /pubmed/21847336 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S23147 Text en © 2011 Paranhos et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd. This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
de Freitas Santos Paranhos, Juliane
Ávila, Marcos Pereira
Paranhos, Augusto
Schor, Paulo
Visual perception changes and optical stability after intracorneal ring segment implantation: comparison between 3 months and 1 year after surgery
title Visual perception changes and optical stability after intracorneal ring segment implantation: comparison between 3 months and 1 year after surgery
title_full Visual perception changes and optical stability after intracorneal ring segment implantation: comparison between 3 months and 1 year after surgery
title_fullStr Visual perception changes and optical stability after intracorneal ring segment implantation: comparison between 3 months and 1 year after surgery
title_full_unstemmed Visual perception changes and optical stability after intracorneal ring segment implantation: comparison between 3 months and 1 year after surgery
title_short Visual perception changes and optical stability after intracorneal ring segment implantation: comparison between 3 months and 1 year after surgery
title_sort visual perception changes and optical stability after intracorneal ring segment implantation: comparison between 3 months and 1 year after surgery
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3155269/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21847336
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S23147
work_keys_str_mv AT defreitassantosparanhosjuliane visualperceptionchangesandopticalstabilityafterintracornealringsegmentimplantationcomparisonbetween3monthsand1yearaftersurgery
AT avilamarcospereira visualperceptionchangesandopticalstabilityafterintracornealringsegmentimplantationcomparisonbetween3monthsand1yearaftersurgery
AT paranhosaugusto visualperceptionchangesandopticalstabilityafterintracornealringsegmentimplantationcomparisonbetween3monthsand1yearaftersurgery
AT schorpaulo visualperceptionchangesandopticalstabilityafterintracornealringsegmentimplantationcomparisonbetween3monthsand1yearaftersurgery