Cargando…

Efficacy of Fidaxomicin Versus Vancomycin as Therapy for Clostridium difficile Infection in Individuals Taking Concomitant Antibiotics for Other Concurrent Infections

Background. Treatment guidelines recommend stopping all implicated antibiotics at the onset of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI), but many individuals have persistent or new infections necessitating the use of concomitant antibiotics (CAs). We used data from 2 phase 3 trials to study effects of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mullane, Kathleen M., Miller, Mark A., Weiss, Karl, Lentnek, Arnold, Golan, Yoav, Sears, Pamela S., Shue, Youe-Kong, Louie, Thomas J., Gorbach, Sherwood L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3156139/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21844027
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cid/cir404
_version_ 1782210180796121088
author Mullane, Kathleen M.
Miller, Mark A.
Weiss, Karl
Lentnek, Arnold
Golan, Yoav
Sears, Pamela S.
Shue, Youe-Kong
Louie, Thomas J.
Gorbach, Sherwood L.
author_facet Mullane, Kathleen M.
Miller, Mark A.
Weiss, Karl
Lentnek, Arnold
Golan, Yoav
Sears, Pamela S.
Shue, Youe-Kong
Louie, Thomas J.
Gorbach, Sherwood L.
author_sort Mullane, Kathleen M.
collection PubMed
description Background. Treatment guidelines recommend stopping all implicated antibiotics at the onset of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI), but many individuals have persistent or new infections necessitating the use of concomitant antibiotics (CAs). We used data from 2 phase 3 trials to study effects of CAs on response to fidaxomicin or vancomycin. Methods. Subjects with CDI were treated for 10 days with fidaxomicin 200 mg every 12 hours or vancomycin 125 mg every 6 hours, assessed for resolution of symptoms, and followed up for an additional 4 weeks for evidence of recurrence. Rates of cure, recurrence, and global cure (cure without recurrence) were determined for subgroups of subjects defined by CA use and treatment group. Results. CAs were prescribed for 27.5% of subjects during study participation. The use of CAs concurrent with CDI treatment was associated with a lower cure rate (84.4% vs 92.6%; P < .001) and an extended time to resolution of diarrhea (97 vs 54 hours; P < .001). CA use during the follow-up was associated with more recurrences (24.8% vs 17.7%; not significant), and CA administration at any time was associated with a lower global cure rate (65.8% vs 74.7%; P = .005). When subjects received CAs concurrent with CDI treatment, the cure rate was 90.0% for fidaxomicin and 79.4% for vancomycin (P = .04). In subjects receiving CAs during treatment and/or follow-up, treatment with fidaxomicin compared with vancomycin was associated with 12.3% fewer recurrences (16.9% vs 29.2%; P = .048). Conclusions. Treatment with CAs compromised initial response to CDI therapy and durability of response. Fidaxomicin was significantly more effective than vancomycin in achieving clinical cure in the presence of CA therapy and in preventing recurrence regardless of CA use.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3156139
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31561392011-09-01 Efficacy of Fidaxomicin Versus Vancomycin as Therapy for Clostridium difficile Infection in Individuals Taking Concomitant Antibiotics for Other Concurrent Infections Mullane, Kathleen M. Miller, Mark A. Weiss, Karl Lentnek, Arnold Golan, Yoav Sears, Pamela S. Shue, Youe-Kong Louie, Thomas J. Gorbach, Sherwood L. Clin Infect Dis Articles and Commentaries Background. Treatment guidelines recommend stopping all implicated antibiotics at the onset of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI), but many individuals have persistent or new infections necessitating the use of concomitant antibiotics (CAs). We used data from 2 phase 3 trials to study effects of CAs on response to fidaxomicin or vancomycin. Methods. Subjects with CDI were treated for 10 days with fidaxomicin 200 mg every 12 hours or vancomycin 125 mg every 6 hours, assessed for resolution of symptoms, and followed up for an additional 4 weeks for evidence of recurrence. Rates of cure, recurrence, and global cure (cure without recurrence) were determined for subgroups of subjects defined by CA use and treatment group. Results. CAs were prescribed for 27.5% of subjects during study participation. The use of CAs concurrent with CDI treatment was associated with a lower cure rate (84.4% vs 92.6%; P < .001) and an extended time to resolution of diarrhea (97 vs 54 hours; P < .001). CA use during the follow-up was associated with more recurrences (24.8% vs 17.7%; not significant), and CA administration at any time was associated with a lower global cure rate (65.8% vs 74.7%; P = .005). When subjects received CAs concurrent with CDI treatment, the cure rate was 90.0% for fidaxomicin and 79.4% for vancomycin (P = .04). In subjects receiving CAs during treatment and/or follow-up, treatment with fidaxomicin compared with vancomycin was associated with 12.3% fewer recurrences (16.9% vs 29.2%; P = .048). Conclusions. Treatment with CAs compromised initial response to CDI therapy and durability of response. Fidaxomicin was significantly more effective than vancomycin in achieving clinical cure in the presence of CA therapy and in preventing recurrence regardless of CA use. Oxford University Press 2011-09-01 /pmc/articles/PMC3156139/ /pubmed/21844027 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cid/cir404 Text en © The Author 2011. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email:journals.permissions@oup.com. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Articles and Commentaries
Mullane, Kathleen M.
Miller, Mark A.
Weiss, Karl
Lentnek, Arnold
Golan, Yoav
Sears, Pamela S.
Shue, Youe-Kong
Louie, Thomas J.
Gorbach, Sherwood L.
Efficacy of Fidaxomicin Versus Vancomycin as Therapy for Clostridium difficile Infection in Individuals Taking Concomitant Antibiotics for Other Concurrent Infections
title Efficacy of Fidaxomicin Versus Vancomycin as Therapy for Clostridium difficile Infection in Individuals Taking Concomitant Antibiotics for Other Concurrent Infections
title_full Efficacy of Fidaxomicin Versus Vancomycin as Therapy for Clostridium difficile Infection in Individuals Taking Concomitant Antibiotics for Other Concurrent Infections
title_fullStr Efficacy of Fidaxomicin Versus Vancomycin as Therapy for Clostridium difficile Infection in Individuals Taking Concomitant Antibiotics for Other Concurrent Infections
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of Fidaxomicin Versus Vancomycin as Therapy for Clostridium difficile Infection in Individuals Taking Concomitant Antibiotics for Other Concurrent Infections
title_short Efficacy of Fidaxomicin Versus Vancomycin as Therapy for Clostridium difficile Infection in Individuals Taking Concomitant Antibiotics for Other Concurrent Infections
title_sort efficacy of fidaxomicin versus vancomycin as therapy for clostridium difficile infection in individuals taking concomitant antibiotics for other concurrent infections
topic Articles and Commentaries
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3156139/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21844027
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cid/cir404
work_keys_str_mv AT mullanekathleenm efficacyoffidaxomicinversusvancomycinastherapyforclostridiumdifficileinfectioninindividualstakingconcomitantantibioticsforotherconcurrentinfections
AT millermarka efficacyoffidaxomicinversusvancomycinastherapyforclostridiumdifficileinfectioninindividualstakingconcomitantantibioticsforotherconcurrentinfections
AT weisskarl efficacyoffidaxomicinversusvancomycinastherapyforclostridiumdifficileinfectioninindividualstakingconcomitantantibioticsforotherconcurrentinfections
AT lentnekarnold efficacyoffidaxomicinversusvancomycinastherapyforclostridiumdifficileinfectioninindividualstakingconcomitantantibioticsforotherconcurrentinfections
AT golanyoav efficacyoffidaxomicinversusvancomycinastherapyforclostridiumdifficileinfectioninindividualstakingconcomitantantibioticsforotherconcurrentinfections
AT searspamelas efficacyoffidaxomicinversusvancomycinastherapyforclostridiumdifficileinfectioninindividualstakingconcomitantantibioticsforotherconcurrentinfections
AT shueyouekong efficacyoffidaxomicinversusvancomycinastherapyforclostridiumdifficileinfectioninindividualstakingconcomitantantibioticsforotherconcurrentinfections
AT louiethomasj efficacyoffidaxomicinversusvancomycinastherapyforclostridiumdifficileinfectioninindividualstakingconcomitantantibioticsforotherconcurrentinfections
AT gorbachsherwoodl efficacyoffidaxomicinversusvancomycinastherapyforclostridiumdifficileinfectioninindividualstakingconcomitantantibioticsforotherconcurrentinfections