Cargando…
A randomized trial of vaginal misoprostol for cervical priming before hysteroscopy in postmenopausal women
OBJECTIVE: To perform hysteroscopy the cervix needs to be dilated and in nullipara and postmenopausal women this is sometimes difficult. Well-known, entry-related complications during hysteroscopy include cervical tear, creation of false tract, bleeding, uterine perforation, scarring, and subsequent...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3156496/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21897735 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0976-7800.83263 |
_version_ | 1782210195410124800 |
---|---|
author | Kant, Anita Divyakumar, Priyambada, Usha |
author_facet | Kant, Anita Divyakumar, Priyambada, Usha |
author_sort | Kant, Anita |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To perform hysteroscopy the cervix needs to be dilated and in nullipara and postmenopausal women this is sometimes difficult. Well-known, entry-related complications during hysteroscopy include cervical tear, creation of false tract, bleeding, uterine perforation, scarring, and subsequent anatomical stenosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was done to investigate the priming effect of vaginal misoprostol on cervical dilatation in postmenopausal women, before hysteroscopy, to prevent such complications. Two hundred micrograms of misoprostol was inserted into the vagina at least 12 hours before the procedure and the control group did not receive any cervical priming agent. Pre-procedural dilatation, additional dilatation required, and time taken for dilatation was noted in each case. OBSERVATIONS: The study showed a significant difference between the study group (7.7 ± 1.7 mm) and the control group (4.5 ± 1.8 mm) in terms of pre-procedural cervical width and the number of women requiring a dditional dilatation (7 / 25 versus 22 / 25), and hence, the time required for dilatation (4.7 ± 8 seconds versus 20.6 ± 9.3 seconds). CONCLUSION: The pre-procedural cervical width was significantly more in the study group as compared to that in the control group. We found significant differences between the study and control groups with respect to the number of women who required cervical dilatation. To conclude, this study helps derive a conclusion that vaginal misoprostol as a cervical priming agent in postmenopausal women appears to be safe, effective, and inexpensive, with mild side effects. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3156496 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | Medknow Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-31564962011-09-06 A randomized trial of vaginal misoprostol for cervical priming before hysteroscopy in postmenopausal women Kant, Anita Divyakumar, Priyambada, Usha J Midlife Health Original Article OBJECTIVE: To perform hysteroscopy the cervix needs to be dilated and in nullipara and postmenopausal women this is sometimes difficult. Well-known, entry-related complications during hysteroscopy include cervical tear, creation of false tract, bleeding, uterine perforation, scarring, and subsequent anatomical stenosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was done to investigate the priming effect of vaginal misoprostol on cervical dilatation in postmenopausal women, before hysteroscopy, to prevent such complications. Two hundred micrograms of misoprostol was inserted into the vagina at least 12 hours before the procedure and the control group did not receive any cervical priming agent. Pre-procedural dilatation, additional dilatation required, and time taken for dilatation was noted in each case. OBSERVATIONS: The study showed a significant difference between the study group (7.7 ± 1.7 mm) and the control group (4.5 ± 1.8 mm) in terms of pre-procedural cervical width and the number of women requiring a dditional dilatation (7 / 25 versus 22 / 25), and hence, the time required for dilatation (4.7 ± 8 seconds versus 20.6 ± 9.3 seconds). CONCLUSION: The pre-procedural cervical width was significantly more in the study group as compared to that in the control group. We found significant differences between the study and control groups with respect to the number of women who required cervical dilatation. To conclude, this study helps derive a conclusion that vaginal misoprostol as a cervical priming agent in postmenopausal women appears to be safe, effective, and inexpensive, with mild side effects. Medknow Publications 2011 /pmc/articles/PMC3156496/ /pubmed/21897735 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0976-7800.83263 Text en © Journal of Mid-life Health http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Kant, Anita Divyakumar, Priyambada, Usha A randomized trial of vaginal misoprostol for cervical priming before hysteroscopy in postmenopausal women |
title | A randomized trial of vaginal misoprostol for cervical priming before hysteroscopy in postmenopausal women |
title_full | A randomized trial of vaginal misoprostol for cervical priming before hysteroscopy in postmenopausal women |
title_fullStr | A randomized trial of vaginal misoprostol for cervical priming before hysteroscopy in postmenopausal women |
title_full_unstemmed | A randomized trial of vaginal misoprostol for cervical priming before hysteroscopy in postmenopausal women |
title_short | A randomized trial of vaginal misoprostol for cervical priming before hysteroscopy in postmenopausal women |
title_sort | randomized trial of vaginal misoprostol for cervical priming before hysteroscopy in postmenopausal women |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3156496/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21897735 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0976-7800.83263 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kantanita arandomizedtrialofvaginalmisoprostolforcervicalprimingbeforehysteroscopyinpostmenopausalwomen AT divyakumar arandomizedtrialofvaginalmisoprostolforcervicalprimingbeforehysteroscopyinpostmenopausalwomen AT priyambadausha arandomizedtrialofvaginalmisoprostolforcervicalprimingbeforehysteroscopyinpostmenopausalwomen AT kantanita randomizedtrialofvaginalmisoprostolforcervicalprimingbeforehysteroscopyinpostmenopausalwomen AT divyakumar randomizedtrialofvaginalmisoprostolforcervicalprimingbeforehysteroscopyinpostmenopausalwomen AT priyambadausha randomizedtrialofvaginalmisoprostolforcervicalprimingbeforehysteroscopyinpostmenopausalwomen |