Cargando…
Variation in reoperation after colorectal surgery in England as an indicator of surgical performance: retrospective analysis of Hospital Episode Statistics
Objective To describe national reoperation rates after elective and emergency colorectal resection and to assess the feasibility of using reoperation as a quality indicator derived from routinely collected data in England. Design Retrospective observational study of Hospital Episode Statistics (HES)...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3156827/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21846714 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d4836 |
_version_ | 1782210245678858240 |
---|---|
author | Burns, Elaine M Bottle, Alex Aylin, Paul Darzi, Ara Nicholls, R John Faiz, Omar |
author_facet | Burns, Elaine M Bottle, Alex Aylin, Paul Darzi, Ara Nicholls, R John Faiz, Omar |
author_sort | Burns, Elaine M |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objective To describe national reoperation rates after elective and emergency colorectal resection and to assess the feasibility of using reoperation as a quality indicator derived from routinely collected data in England. Design Retrospective observational study of Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) data. Setting HES dataset, an administrative dataset covering the entire English National Health Service. Participants All patients undergoing a primary colorectal resection in England between 2000 and 2008. Main outcome measures Reoperation after colorectal resection, defined as any reoperation for an intra-abdominal procedure or wound complication within 28 days of surgery on the index or subsequent admission to hospital. Results The national reoperation rate was 6.5% (15 986/246 469). A large degree of variation was identified among institutions and surgeons. Even among institutions and surgical teams with high caseloads, threefold and fivefold differences in reoperation rates were observed between the highest and lowest performing trusts and surgeons. Of the NHS trusts studied, 14.1% (22/156) had adjusted reoperation rates above the upper 99.8% control limit. Factors independently associated with higher risk of reoperation were diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease (odds ratio 1.33 (95% CI 1.24 to 1.42), P<0.001), presence of multiple comorbidity (odds ratio 1.34 (1.29 to 1.39), P<0.001), social deprivation (1.14 (1.08 to 1.20) for most deprived, P<0.001), male sex (1.33 (1.29 to 1.38), P<0.001), rectal resection (1.63 (1.56 to 1.71), P<0.001), laparoscopic surgery (1.11 (1.03 to 1.20), P=0.006), and emergency admission (1.21 (1.17 to 1.26), P<0.001). Conclusions There is large variation in reoperation after colorectal surgery between hospitals and surgeons in England. If data accuracy can be assured, reoperation may allow performance to be checked against national standards from current routinely collected data, alongside other indicators such as mortality. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3156827 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-31568272011-09-01 Variation in reoperation after colorectal surgery in England as an indicator of surgical performance: retrospective analysis of Hospital Episode Statistics Burns, Elaine M Bottle, Alex Aylin, Paul Darzi, Ara Nicholls, R John Faiz, Omar BMJ Research Objective To describe national reoperation rates after elective and emergency colorectal resection and to assess the feasibility of using reoperation as a quality indicator derived from routinely collected data in England. Design Retrospective observational study of Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) data. Setting HES dataset, an administrative dataset covering the entire English National Health Service. Participants All patients undergoing a primary colorectal resection in England between 2000 and 2008. Main outcome measures Reoperation after colorectal resection, defined as any reoperation for an intra-abdominal procedure or wound complication within 28 days of surgery on the index or subsequent admission to hospital. Results The national reoperation rate was 6.5% (15 986/246 469). A large degree of variation was identified among institutions and surgeons. Even among institutions and surgical teams with high caseloads, threefold and fivefold differences in reoperation rates were observed between the highest and lowest performing trusts and surgeons. Of the NHS trusts studied, 14.1% (22/156) had adjusted reoperation rates above the upper 99.8% control limit. Factors independently associated with higher risk of reoperation were diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease (odds ratio 1.33 (95% CI 1.24 to 1.42), P<0.001), presence of multiple comorbidity (odds ratio 1.34 (1.29 to 1.39), P<0.001), social deprivation (1.14 (1.08 to 1.20) for most deprived, P<0.001), male sex (1.33 (1.29 to 1.38), P<0.001), rectal resection (1.63 (1.56 to 1.71), P<0.001), laparoscopic surgery (1.11 (1.03 to 1.20), P=0.006), and emergency admission (1.21 (1.17 to 1.26), P<0.001). Conclusions There is large variation in reoperation after colorectal surgery between hospitals and surgeons in England. If data accuracy can be assured, reoperation may allow performance to be checked against national standards from current routinely collected data, alongside other indicators such as mortality. BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2011-08-16 /pmc/articles/PMC3156827/ /pubmed/21846714 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d4836 Text en © Burns et al 2011 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/legalcode. |
spellingShingle | Research Burns, Elaine M Bottle, Alex Aylin, Paul Darzi, Ara Nicholls, R John Faiz, Omar Variation in reoperation after colorectal surgery in England as an indicator of surgical performance: retrospective analysis of Hospital Episode Statistics |
title | Variation in reoperation after colorectal surgery in England as an indicator of surgical performance: retrospective analysis of Hospital Episode Statistics |
title_full | Variation in reoperation after colorectal surgery in England as an indicator of surgical performance: retrospective analysis of Hospital Episode Statistics |
title_fullStr | Variation in reoperation after colorectal surgery in England as an indicator of surgical performance: retrospective analysis of Hospital Episode Statistics |
title_full_unstemmed | Variation in reoperation after colorectal surgery in England as an indicator of surgical performance: retrospective analysis of Hospital Episode Statistics |
title_short | Variation in reoperation after colorectal surgery in England as an indicator of surgical performance: retrospective analysis of Hospital Episode Statistics |
title_sort | variation in reoperation after colorectal surgery in england as an indicator of surgical performance: retrospective analysis of hospital episode statistics |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3156827/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21846714 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d4836 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT burnselainem variationinreoperationaftercolorectalsurgeryinenglandasanindicatorofsurgicalperformanceretrospectiveanalysisofhospitalepisodestatistics AT bottlealex variationinreoperationaftercolorectalsurgeryinenglandasanindicatorofsurgicalperformanceretrospectiveanalysisofhospitalepisodestatistics AT aylinpaul variationinreoperationaftercolorectalsurgeryinenglandasanindicatorofsurgicalperformanceretrospectiveanalysisofhospitalepisodestatistics AT darziara variationinreoperationaftercolorectalsurgeryinenglandasanindicatorofsurgicalperformanceretrospectiveanalysisofhospitalepisodestatistics AT nichollsrjohn variationinreoperationaftercolorectalsurgeryinenglandasanindicatorofsurgicalperformanceretrospectiveanalysisofhospitalepisodestatistics AT faizomar variationinreoperationaftercolorectalsurgeryinenglandasanindicatorofsurgicalperformanceretrospectiveanalysisofhospitalepisodestatistics |