Cargando…

Variation in reoperation after colorectal surgery in England as an indicator of surgical performance: retrospective analysis of Hospital Episode Statistics

Objective To describe national reoperation rates after elective and emergency colorectal resection and to assess the feasibility of using reoperation as a quality indicator derived from routinely collected data in England. Design Retrospective observational study of Hospital Episode Statistics (HES)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Burns, Elaine M, Bottle, Alex, Aylin, Paul, Darzi, Ara, Nicholls, R John, Faiz, Omar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3156827/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21846714
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d4836
_version_ 1782210245678858240
author Burns, Elaine M
Bottle, Alex
Aylin, Paul
Darzi, Ara
Nicholls, R John
Faiz, Omar
author_facet Burns, Elaine M
Bottle, Alex
Aylin, Paul
Darzi, Ara
Nicholls, R John
Faiz, Omar
author_sort Burns, Elaine M
collection PubMed
description Objective To describe national reoperation rates after elective and emergency colorectal resection and to assess the feasibility of using reoperation as a quality indicator derived from routinely collected data in England. Design Retrospective observational study of Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) data. Setting HES dataset, an administrative dataset covering the entire English National Health Service. Participants All patients undergoing a primary colorectal resection in England between 2000 and 2008. Main outcome measures Reoperation after colorectal resection, defined as any reoperation for an intra-abdominal procedure or wound complication within 28 days of surgery on the index or subsequent admission to hospital. Results The national reoperation rate was 6.5% (15 986/246 469). A large degree of variation was identified among institutions and surgeons. Even among institutions and surgical teams with high caseloads, threefold and fivefold differences in reoperation rates were observed between the highest and lowest performing trusts and surgeons. Of the NHS trusts studied, 14.1% (22/156) had adjusted reoperation rates above the upper 99.8% control limit. Factors independently associated with higher risk of reoperation were diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease (odds ratio 1.33 (95% CI 1.24 to 1.42), P<0.001), presence of multiple comorbidity (odds ratio 1.34 (1.29 to 1.39), P<0.001), social deprivation (1.14 (1.08 to 1.20) for most deprived, P<0.001), male sex (1.33 (1.29 to 1.38), P<0.001), rectal resection (1.63 (1.56 to 1.71), P<0.001), laparoscopic surgery (1.11 (1.03 to 1.20), P=0.006), and emergency admission (1.21 (1.17 to 1.26), P<0.001). Conclusions There is large variation in reoperation after colorectal surgery between hospitals and surgeons in England. If data accuracy can be assured, reoperation may allow performance to be checked against national standards from current routinely collected data, alongside other indicators such as mortality.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3156827
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31568272011-09-01 Variation in reoperation after colorectal surgery in England as an indicator of surgical performance: retrospective analysis of Hospital Episode Statistics Burns, Elaine M Bottle, Alex Aylin, Paul Darzi, Ara Nicholls, R John Faiz, Omar BMJ Research Objective To describe national reoperation rates after elective and emergency colorectal resection and to assess the feasibility of using reoperation as a quality indicator derived from routinely collected data in England. Design Retrospective observational study of Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) data. Setting HES dataset, an administrative dataset covering the entire English National Health Service. Participants All patients undergoing a primary colorectal resection in England between 2000 and 2008. Main outcome measures Reoperation after colorectal resection, defined as any reoperation for an intra-abdominal procedure or wound complication within 28 days of surgery on the index or subsequent admission to hospital. Results The national reoperation rate was 6.5% (15 986/246 469). A large degree of variation was identified among institutions and surgeons. Even among institutions and surgical teams with high caseloads, threefold and fivefold differences in reoperation rates were observed between the highest and lowest performing trusts and surgeons. Of the NHS trusts studied, 14.1% (22/156) had adjusted reoperation rates above the upper 99.8% control limit. Factors independently associated with higher risk of reoperation were diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease (odds ratio 1.33 (95% CI 1.24 to 1.42), P<0.001), presence of multiple comorbidity (odds ratio 1.34 (1.29 to 1.39), P<0.001), social deprivation (1.14 (1.08 to 1.20) for most deprived, P<0.001), male sex (1.33 (1.29 to 1.38), P<0.001), rectal resection (1.63 (1.56 to 1.71), P<0.001), laparoscopic surgery (1.11 (1.03 to 1.20), P=0.006), and emergency admission (1.21 (1.17 to 1.26), P<0.001). Conclusions There is large variation in reoperation after colorectal surgery between hospitals and surgeons in England. If data accuracy can be assured, reoperation may allow performance to be checked against national standards from current routinely collected data, alongside other indicators such as mortality. BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2011-08-16 /pmc/articles/PMC3156827/ /pubmed/21846714 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d4836 Text en © Burns et al 2011 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/legalcode.
spellingShingle Research
Burns, Elaine M
Bottle, Alex
Aylin, Paul
Darzi, Ara
Nicholls, R John
Faiz, Omar
Variation in reoperation after colorectal surgery in England as an indicator of surgical performance: retrospective analysis of Hospital Episode Statistics
title Variation in reoperation after colorectal surgery in England as an indicator of surgical performance: retrospective analysis of Hospital Episode Statistics
title_full Variation in reoperation after colorectal surgery in England as an indicator of surgical performance: retrospective analysis of Hospital Episode Statistics
title_fullStr Variation in reoperation after colorectal surgery in England as an indicator of surgical performance: retrospective analysis of Hospital Episode Statistics
title_full_unstemmed Variation in reoperation after colorectal surgery in England as an indicator of surgical performance: retrospective analysis of Hospital Episode Statistics
title_short Variation in reoperation after colorectal surgery in England as an indicator of surgical performance: retrospective analysis of Hospital Episode Statistics
title_sort variation in reoperation after colorectal surgery in england as an indicator of surgical performance: retrospective analysis of hospital episode statistics
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3156827/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21846714
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d4836
work_keys_str_mv AT burnselainem variationinreoperationaftercolorectalsurgeryinenglandasanindicatorofsurgicalperformanceretrospectiveanalysisofhospitalepisodestatistics
AT bottlealex variationinreoperationaftercolorectalsurgeryinenglandasanindicatorofsurgicalperformanceretrospectiveanalysisofhospitalepisodestatistics
AT aylinpaul variationinreoperationaftercolorectalsurgeryinenglandasanindicatorofsurgicalperformanceretrospectiveanalysisofhospitalepisodestatistics
AT darziara variationinreoperationaftercolorectalsurgeryinenglandasanindicatorofsurgicalperformanceretrospectiveanalysisofhospitalepisodestatistics
AT nichollsrjohn variationinreoperationaftercolorectalsurgeryinenglandasanindicatorofsurgicalperformanceretrospectiveanalysisofhospitalepisodestatistics
AT faizomar variationinreoperationaftercolorectalsurgeryinenglandasanindicatorofsurgicalperformanceretrospectiveanalysisofhospitalepisodestatistics