Cargando…

The Failure of R (0)

The basic reproductive ratio, R (0), is one of the fundamental concepts in mathematical biology. It is a threshold parameter, intended to quantify the spread of disease by estimating the average number of secondary infections in a wholly susceptible population, giving an indication of the invasion s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Jing, Blakeley, Daniel, Smith?, Robert J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3157160/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21860658
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/527610
_version_ 1782210278524452864
author Li, Jing
Blakeley, Daniel
Smith?, Robert J.
author_facet Li, Jing
Blakeley, Daniel
Smith?, Robert J.
author_sort Li, Jing
collection PubMed
description The basic reproductive ratio, R (0), is one of the fundamental concepts in mathematical biology. It is a threshold parameter, intended to quantify the spread of disease by estimating the average number of secondary infections in a wholly susceptible population, giving an indication of the invasion strength of an epidemic: if R (0) < 1, the disease dies out, whereas if R (0) > 1, the disease persists. R (0) has been widely used as a measure of disease strength to estimate the effectiveness of control measures and to form the backbone of disease-management policy. However, in almost every aspect that matters, R (0) is flawed. Diseases can persist with R (0) < 1, while diseases with R (0) > 1 can die out. We show that the same model of malaria gives many different values of R (0), depending on the method used, with the sole common property that they have a threshold at 1. We also survey estimated values of R (0) for a variety of diseases, and examine some of the alternatives that have been proposed. If R (0) is to be used, it must be accompanied by caveats about the method of calculation, underlying model assumptions and evidence that it is actually a threshold. Otherwise, the concept is meaningless.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3157160
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31571602011-08-22 The Failure of R (0) Li, Jing Blakeley, Daniel Smith?, Robert J. Comput Math Methods Med Review Article The basic reproductive ratio, R (0), is one of the fundamental concepts in mathematical biology. It is a threshold parameter, intended to quantify the spread of disease by estimating the average number of secondary infections in a wholly susceptible population, giving an indication of the invasion strength of an epidemic: if R (0) < 1, the disease dies out, whereas if R (0) > 1, the disease persists. R (0) has been widely used as a measure of disease strength to estimate the effectiveness of control measures and to form the backbone of disease-management policy. However, in almost every aspect that matters, R (0) is flawed. Diseases can persist with R (0) < 1, while diseases with R (0) > 1 can die out. We show that the same model of malaria gives many different values of R (0), depending on the method used, with the sole common property that they have a threshold at 1. We also survey estimated values of R (0) for a variety of diseases, and examine some of the alternatives that have been proposed. If R (0) is to be used, it must be accompanied by caveats about the method of calculation, underlying model assumptions and evidence that it is actually a threshold. Otherwise, the concept is meaningless. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2011 2011-08-16 /pmc/articles/PMC3157160/ /pubmed/21860658 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/527610 Text en Copyright © 2011 Jing Li et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Li, Jing
Blakeley, Daniel
Smith?, Robert J.
The Failure of R (0)
title The Failure of R (0)
title_full The Failure of R (0)
title_fullStr The Failure of R (0)
title_full_unstemmed The Failure of R (0)
title_short The Failure of R (0)
title_sort failure of r (0)
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3157160/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21860658
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/527610
work_keys_str_mv AT lijing thefailureofr0
AT blakeleydaniel thefailureofr0
AT smithrobertj thefailureofr0
AT lijing failureofr0
AT blakeleydaniel failureofr0
AT smithrobertj failureofr0