Cargando…

Survey of Canadian Animal-Based Researchers' Views on the Three Rs: Replacement, Reduction and Refinement

The ‘Three Rs’ tenet (replacement, reduction, refinement) is a widely accepted cornerstone of Canadian and international policies on animal-based science. The Canadian Council on Animal Care (CCAC) initiated this web-based survey to obtain greater understanding of ‘principal investigators’ and ‘othe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fenwick, Nicole, Danielson, Peter, Griffin, Gilly
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3157340/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21857928
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0022478
_version_ 1782210283952930816
author Fenwick, Nicole
Danielson, Peter
Griffin, Gilly
author_facet Fenwick, Nicole
Danielson, Peter
Griffin, Gilly
author_sort Fenwick, Nicole
collection PubMed
description The ‘Three Rs’ tenet (replacement, reduction, refinement) is a widely accepted cornerstone of Canadian and international policies on animal-based science. The Canadian Council on Animal Care (CCAC) initiated this web-based survey to obtain greater understanding of ‘principal investigators’ and ‘other researchers’ (i.e. graduate students, post-doctoral researchers etc.) views on the Three Rs, and to identify obstacles and opportunities for continued implementation of the Three Rs in Canada. Responses from 414 participants indicate that researchers currently do not view the goal of replacement as achievable. Researchers prefer to use enough animals to ensure quality data is obtained rather than using the minimum and potentially waste those animals if a problem occurs during the study. Many feel that they already reduce animal numbers as much as possible and have concerns that further reduction may compromise research. Most participants were ambivalent about re-use, but expressed concern that the practice could compromise experimental outcomes. In considering refinement, many researchers feel there are situations where animals should not receive pain relieving drugs because it may compromise scientific outcomes, although there was strong support for the Three Rs strategy of conducting animal welfare-related pilot studies, which were viewed as useful for both animal welfare and experimental design. Participants were not opposed to being offered “assistance” to implement the Three Rs, so long as the input is provided in a collegial manner, and from individuals who are perceived as experts. It may be useful for animal use policymakers to consider what steps are needed to make replacement a more feasible goal. In addition, initiatives that offer researchers greater practical and logistical support with Three Rs implementation may be useful. Encouragement and financial support for Three Rs initiatives may result in valuable contributions to Three Rs knowledge and improve welfare for animals used in science.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3157340
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31573402011-08-19 Survey of Canadian Animal-Based Researchers' Views on the Three Rs: Replacement, Reduction and Refinement Fenwick, Nicole Danielson, Peter Griffin, Gilly PLoS One Research Article The ‘Three Rs’ tenet (replacement, reduction, refinement) is a widely accepted cornerstone of Canadian and international policies on animal-based science. The Canadian Council on Animal Care (CCAC) initiated this web-based survey to obtain greater understanding of ‘principal investigators’ and ‘other researchers’ (i.e. graduate students, post-doctoral researchers etc.) views on the Three Rs, and to identify obstacles and opportunities for continued implementation of the Three Rs in Canada. Responses from 414 participants indicate that researchers currently do not view the goal of replacement as achievable. Researchers prefer to use enough animals to ensure quality data is obtained rather than using the minimum and potentially waste those animals if a problem occurs during the study. Many feel that they already reduce animal numbers as much as possible and have concerns that further reduction may compromise research. Most participants were ambivalent about re-use, but expressed concern that the practice could compromise experimental outcomes. In considering refinement, many researchers feel there are situations where animals should not receive pain relieving drugs because it may compromise scientific outcomes, although there was strong support for the Three Rs strategy of conducting animal welfare-related pilot studies, which were viewed as useful for both animal welfare and experimental design. Participants were not opposed to being offered “assistance” to implement the Three Rs, so long as the input is provided in a collegial manner, and from individuals who are perceived as experts. It may be useful for animal use policymakers to consider what steps are needed to make replacement a more feasible goal. In addition, initiatives that offer researchers greater practical and logistical support with Three Rs implementation may be useful. Encouragement and financial support for Three Rs initiatives may result in valuable contributions to Three Rs knowledge and improve welfare for animals used in science. Public Library of Science 2011-08-17 /pmc/articles/PMC3157340/ /pubmed/21857928 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0022478 Text en Fenwick et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Fenwick, Nicole
Danielson, Peter
Griffin, Gilly
Survey of Canadian Animal-Based Researchers' Views on the Three Rs: Replacement, Reduction and Refinement
title Survey of Canadian Animal-Based Researchers' Views on the Three Rs: Replacement, Reduction and Refinement
title_full Survey of Canadian Animal-Based Researchers' Views on the Three Rs: Replacement, Reduction and Refinement
title_fullStr Survey of Canadian Animal-Based Researchers' Views on the Three Rs: Replacement, Reduction and Refinement
title_full_unstemmed Survey of Canadian Animal-Based Researchers' Views on the Three Rs: Replacement, Reduction and Refinement
title_short Survey of Canadian Animal-Based Researchers' Views on the Three Rs: Replacement, Reduction and Refinement
title_sort survey of canadian animal-based researchers' views on the three rs: replacement, reduction and refinement
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3157340/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21857928
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0022478
work_keys_str_mv AT fenwicknicole surveyofcanadiananimalbasedresearchersviewsonthethreersreplacementreductionandrefinement
AT danielsonpeter surveyofcanadiananimalbasedresearchersviewsonthethreersreplacementreductionandrefinement
AT griffingilly surveyofcanadiananimalbasedresearchersviewsonthethreersreplacementreductionandrefinement