Cargando…

Assessing Errors Inherent in OCT-Derived Macular Thickness Maps

SD-OCT has become an essential tool for evaluating macular pathology; however several aspects of data collection and analysis affect the accuracy of retinal thickness measurements. Here we evaluated sampling density, scan centering, and axial length compensation as factors affecting the accuracy of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Odell, Daniel, Dubis, Adam M., Lever, Jackson F., Stepien, Kimberly E., Carroll, Joseph
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3157761/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21869920
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/692574
_version_ 1782210332207349760
author Odell, Daniel
Dubis, Adam M.
Lever, Jackson F.
Stepien, Kimberly E.
Carroll, Joseph
author_facet Odell, Daniel
Dubis, Adam M.
Lever, Jackson F.
Stepien, Kimberly E.
Carroll, Joseph
author_sort Odell, Daniel
collection PubMed
description SD-OCT has become an essential tool for evaluating macular pathology; however several aspects of data collection and analysis affect the accuracy of retinal thickness measurements. Here we evaluated sampling density, scan centering, and axial length compensation as factors affecting the accuracy of macular thickness maps. Forty-three patients with various retinal pathologies and 113 normal subjects were imaged using Cirrus HD-OCT. Reduced B-scan density was associated with increased interpolation error in ETDRS macular thickness plots. Correcting for individual differences in axial length revealed modest errors in retinal thickness maps, while more pronounced errors were observed when the ETDRS plot was not positioned at the center of the fovea (which can occur as a result of errant fixation). Cumulative error can exceed hundreds of microns, even under “ideal observer” conditions. This preventable error is particularly relevant when attempting to compare macular thickness maps to normative databases or measuring the area or volume of retinal features.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3157761
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31577612011-08-25 Assessing Errors Inherent in OCT-Derived Macular Thickness Maps Odell, Daniel Dubis, Adam M. Lever, Jackson F. Stepien, Kimberly E. Carroll, Joseph J Ophthalmol Research Article SD-OCT has become an essential tool for evaluating macular pathology; however several aspects of data collection and analysis affect the accuracy of retinal thickness measurements. Here we evaluated sampling density, scan centering, and axial length compensation as factors affecting the accuracy of macular thickness maps. Forty-three patients with various retinal pathologies and 113 normal subjects were imaged using Cirrus HD-OCT. Reduced B-scan density was associated with increased interpolation error in ETDRS macular thickness plots. Correcting for individual differences in axial length revealed modest errors in retinal thickness maps, while more pronounced errors were observed when the ETDRS plot was not positioned at the center of the fovea (which can occur as a result of errant fixation). Cumulative error can exceed hundreds of microns, even under “ideal observer” conditions. This preventable error is particularly relevant when attempting to compare macular thickness maps to normative databases or measuring the area or volume of retinal features. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2011 2011-08-17 /pmc/articles/PMC3157761/ /pubmed/21869920 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/692574 Text en Copyright © 2011 Daniel Odell et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Odell, Daniel
Dubis, Adam M.
Lever, Jackson F.
Stepien, Kimberly E.
Carroll, Joseph
Assessing Errors Inherent in OCT-Derived Macular Thickness Maps
title Assessing Errors Inherent in OCT-Derived Macular Thickness Maps
title_full Assessing Errors Inherent in OCT-Derived Macular Thickness Maps
title_fullStr Assessing Errors Inherent in OCT-Derived Macular Thickness Maps
title_full_unstemmed Assessing Errors Inherent in OCT-Derived Macular Thickness Maps
title_short Assessing Errors Inherent in OCT-Derived Macular Thickness Maps
title_sort assessing errors inherent in oct-derived macular thickness maps
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3157761/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21869920
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/692574
work_keys_str_mv AT odelldaniel assessingerrorsinherentinoctderivedmacularthicknessmaps
AT dubisadamm assessingerrorsinherentinoctderivedmacularthicknessmaps
AT leverjacksonf assessingerrorsinherentinoctderivedmacularthicknessmaps
AT stepienkimberlye assessingerrorsinherentinoctderivedmacularthicknessmaps
AT carrolljoseph assessingerrorsinherentinoctderivedmacularthicknessmaps