Cargando…
Assessing Errors Inherent in OCT-Derived Macular Thickness Maps
SD-OCT has become an essential tool for evaluating macular pathology; however several aspects of data collection and analysis affect the accuracy of retinal thickness measurements. Here we evaluated sampling density, scan centering, and axial length compensation as factors affecting the accuracy of...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3157761/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21869920 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/692574 |
_version_ | 1782210332207349760 |
---|---|
author | Odell, Daniel Dubis, Adam M. Lever, Jackson F. Stepien, Kimberly E. Carroll, Joseph |
author_facet | Odell, Daniel Dubis, Adam M. Lever, Jackson F. Stepien, Kimberly E. Carroll, Joseph |
author_sort | Odell, Daniel |
collection | PubMed |
description | SD-OCT has become an essential tool for evaluating macular pathology; however several aspects of data collection and analysis affect the accuracy of retinal thickness measurements. Here we evaluated sampling density, scan centering, and axial length compensation as factors affecting the accuracy of macular thickness maps. Forty-three patients with various retinal pathologies and 113 normal subjects were imaged using Cirrus HD-OCT. Reduced B-scan density was associated with increased interpolation error in ETDRS macular thickness plots. Correcting for individual differences in axial length revealed modest errors in retinal thickness maps, while more pronounced errors were observed when the ETDRS plot was not positioned at the center of the fovea (which can occur as a result of errant fixation). Cumulative error can exceed hundreds of microns, even under “ideal observer” conditions. This preventable error is particularly relevant when attempting to compare macular thickness maps to normative databases or measuring the area or volume of retinal features. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3157761 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-31577612011-08-25 Assessing Errors Inherent in OCT-Derived Macular Thickness Maps Odell, Daniel Dubis, Adam M. Lever, Jackson F. Stepien, Kimberly E. Carroll, Joseph J Ophthalmol Research Article SD-OCT has become an essential tool for evaluating macular pathology; however several aspects of data collection and analysis affect the accuracy of retinal thickness measurements. Here we evaluated sampling density, scan centering, and axial length compensation as factors affecting the accuracy of macular thickness maps. Forty-three patients with various retinal pathologies and 113 normal subjects were imaged using Cirrus HD-OCT. Reduced B-scan density was associated with increased interpolation error in ETDRS macular thickness plots. Correcting for individual differences in axial length revealed modest errors in retinal thickness maps, while more pronounced errors were observed when the ETDRS plot was not positioned at the center of the fovea (which can occur as a result of errant fixation). Cumulative error can exceed hundreds of microns, even under “ideal observer” conditions. This preventable error is particularly relevant when attempting to compare macular thickness maps to normative databases or measuring the area or volume of retinal features. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2011 2011-08-17 /pmc/articles/PMC3157761/ /pubmed/21869920 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/692574 Text en Copyright © 2011 Daniel Odell et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Odell, Daniel Dubis, Adam M. Lever, Jackson F. Stepien, Kimberly E. Carroll, Joseph Assessing Errors Inherent in OCT-Derived Macular Thickness Maps |
title | Assessing Errors Inherent in OCT-Derived Macular Thickness Maps |
title_full | Assessing Errors Inherent in OCT-Derived Macular Thickness Maps |
title_fullStr | Assessing Errors Inherent in OCT-Derived Macular Thickness Maps |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessing Errors Inherent in OCT-Derived Macular Thickness Maps |
title_short | Assessing Errors Inherent in OCT-Derived Macular Thickness Maps |
title_sort | assessing errors inherent in oct-derived macular thickness maps |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3157761/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21869920 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/692574 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT odelldaniel assessingerrorsinherentinoctderivedmacularthicknessmaps AT dubisadamm assessingerrorsinherentinoctderivedmacularthicknessmaps AT leverjacksonf assessingerrorsinherentinoctderivedmacularthicknessmaps AT stepienkimberlye assessingerrorsinherentinoctderivedmacularthicknessmaps AT carrolljoseph assessingerrorsinherentinoctderivedmacularthicknessmaps |