Cargando…
Biphasic positive airway pressure ventilation (PeV+) in children
BACKGROUND: Biphasic positive airway pressure (BIPAP) (also known as PeV+) is a mode of ventilation with cycling variations between two continuous positive airway pressure levels. In adults this mode of ventilation is effective and is being accepted with a decrease in need for sedatives because of t...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2001
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC31582/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11353935 |
_version_ | 1782119983989391360 |
---|---|
author | Jaarsma, Anneke S Knoester, Hennie van Rooyen, Frank Bos, Albert P |
author_facet | Jaarsma, Anneke S Knoester, Hennie van Rooyen, Frank Bos, Albert P |
author_sort | Jaarsma, Anneke S |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Biphasic positive airway pressure (BIPAP) (also known as PeV+) is a mode of ventilation with cycling variations between two continuous positive airway pressure levels. In adults this mode of ventilation is effective and is being accepted with a decrease in need for sedatives because of the ability to breathe spontaneously during the entire breathing cycle. We studied the use of BIPAP in infants and children. METHODS: We randomized 18 patients with respiratory failure for ventilation with either BIPAP (n = 11) or assisted spontaneous breathing (ASB) (n = 7) on Evita 4. Lorazepam and, if necessary, morphine were used as sedatives and adjusted in accordance with the Comfort scale. We compared number of randomized mode failure, duration and complications of ventilation and number and dosages of sedatives administered. RESULTS: No differences in patient characteristics, ventilatory parameters, complications of ventilation or use of sedatives were noted. Ten out of eleven patients that we intended to ventilate with BIPAP were successfully ventilated with BIPAP. Four out of seven patients that we intended to ventilate with ASB could not be ventilated adequately with ASB but were successfully crossed over to BIPAP without the need for further sedatives. CONCLUSIONS: BIPAP is an effective, safe and easy to use mode of ventilation in infants and children. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-31582 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2001 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-315822001-05-18 Biphasic positive airway pressure ventilation (PeV+) in children Jaarsma, Anneke S Knoester, Hennie van Rooyen, Frank Bos, Albert P Crit Care Primary Research BACKGROUND: Biphasic positive airway pressure (BIPAP) (also known as PeV+) is a mode of ventilation with cycling variations between two continuous positive airway pressure levels. In adults this mode of ventilation is effective and is being accepted with a decrease in need for sedatives because of the ability to breathe spontaneously during the entire breathing cycle. We studied the use of BIPAP in infants and children. METHODS: We randomized 18 patients with respiratory failure for ventilation with either BIPAP (n = 11) or assisted spontaneous breathing (ASB) (n = 7) on Evita 4. Lorazepam and, if necessary, morphine were used as sedatives and adjusted in accordance with the Comfort scale. We compared number of randomized mode failure, duration and complications of ventilation and number and dosages of sedatives administered. RESULTS: No differences in patient characteristics, ventilatory parameters, complications of ventilation or use of sedatives were noted. Ten out of eleven patients that we intended to ventilate with BIPAP were successfully ventilated with BIPAP. Four out of seven patients that we intended to ventilate with ASB could not be ventilated adequately with ASB but were successfully crossed over to BIPAP without the need for further sedatives. CONCLUSIONS: BIPAP is an effective, safe and easy to use mode of ventilation in infants and children. BioMed Central 2001 2001-05-02 /pmc/articles/PMC31582/ /pubmed/11353935 Text en Copyright © 2001 Author et al, licensee BioMed Central Ltd |
spellingShingle | Primary Research Jaarsma, Anneke S Knoester, Hennie van Rooyen, Frank Bos, Albert P Biphasic positive airway pressure ventilation (PeV+) in children |
title | Biphasic positive airway pressure ventilation (PeV+) in children |
title_full | Biphasic positive airway pressure ventilation (PeV+) in children |
title_fullStr | Biphasic positive airway pressure ventilation (PeV+) in children |
title_full_unstemmed | Biphasic positive airway pressure ventilation (PeV+) in children |
title_short | Biphasic positive airway pressure ventilation (PeV+) in children |
title_sort | biphasic positive airway pressure ventilation (pev+) in children |
topic | Primary Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC31582/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11353935 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jaarsmaannekes biphasicpositiveairwaypressureventilationpevinchildren AT knoesterhennie biphasicpositiveairwaypressureventilationpevinchildren AT vanrooyenfrank biphasicpositiveairwaypressureventilationpevinchildren AT bosalbertp biphasicpositiveairwaypressureventilationpevinchildren |