Cargando…

Principal components’ analysis of multifocal electroretinogram in retinitis pigmentosa

AIMS: To determine waveforms of multifocal electroretinogram (mfERG) in patients with retinitis pigmentosa (RP) contributing significantly to the overall retinal response by using principal components’ analysis. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: Prospective, non-randomized, single-visit, observational, case-cont...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Maiti, Aniruddha, Uparkar, Mahesh, Natarajan, Sundaram, Borse, Nishikanth, Walinjkar, Jaydeep
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3159315/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21836339
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0301-4738.83610
_version_ 1782210449186488320
author Maiti, Aniruddha
Uparkar, Mahesh
Natarajan, Sundaram
Borse, Nishikanth
Walinjkar, Jaydeep
author_facet Maiti, Aniruddha
Uparkar, Mahesh
Natarajan, Sundaram
Borse, Nishikanth
Walinjkar, Jaydeep
author_sort Maiti, Aniruddha
collection PubMed
description AIMS: To determine waveforms of multifocal electroretinogram (mfERG) in patients with retinitis pigmentosa (RP) contributing significantly to the overall retinal response by using principal components’ analysis. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: Prospective, non-randomized, single-visit, observational, case-control study from a single tertiary ophthalmic center. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with various forms of RP underwent mfERG testing for a period of one year. The first-order kernel responses of RP cases were compared with concurrently recruited healthy controls. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Parametric data was analyzed using the unpaired t test for differences between the implicit time and amplitudes of cases and controls. Principal components’ analysis was done for each implicit time and amplitude in cases with RP using the Varimax rotation method. RESULTS: From March 2006 to March 2007, 24 cases with typical RP (56%, 47 eyes) were included in the final analysis. Their mean age was 33.7 years (19-69 ± 15.5 years). Comparison of latencies and amplitudes among RP cases with log MAR acuity ≤ 0.18 and those > 0.18, revealed significant difference in the implicit time (P1) in Ring 2 only (P=0.028). Two components (predominently from Ring 1 and 2) each contributing 66.8% and 88.8% of the total variance in the data for latencies and amplitudes respectively, were seen. CONCLUSIONS: The first two rings of the mfERG contributed to the variance of waveforms in RP, irrespective of the visual acuity and poor visual field results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3159315
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Medknow Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31593152011-09-07 Principal components’ analysis of multifocal electroretinogram in retinitis pigmentosa Maiti, Aniruddha Uparkar, Mahesh Natarajan, Sundaram Borse, Nishikanth Walinjkar, Jaydeep Indian J Ophthalmol Original Article AIMS: To determine waveforms of multifocal electroretinogram (mfERG) in patients with retinitis pigmentosa (RP) contributing significantly to the overall retinal response by using principal components’ analysis. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: Prospective, non-randomized, single-visit, observational, case-control study from a single tertiary ophthalmic center. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with various forms of RP underwent mfERG testing for a period of one year. The first-order kernel responses of RP cases were compared with concurrently recruited healthy controls. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Parametric data was analyzed using the unpaired t test for differences between the implicit time and amplitudes of cases and controls. Principal components’ analysis was done for each implicit time and amplitude in cases with RP using the Varimax rotation method. RESULTS: From March 2006 to March 2007, 24 cases with typical RP (56%, 47 eyes) were included in the final analysis. Their mean age was 33.7 years (19-69 ± 15.5 years). Comparison of latencies and amplitudes among RP cases with log MAR acuity ≤ 0.18 and those > 0.18, revealed significant difference in the implicit time (P1) in Ring 2 only (P=0.028). Two components (predominently from Ring 1 and 2) each contributing 66.8% and 88.8% of the total variance in the data for latencies and amplitudes respectively, were seen. CONCLUSIONS: The first two rings of the mfERG contributed to the variance of waveforms in RP, irrespective of the visual acuity and poor visual field results. Medknow Publications 2011 /pmc/articles/PMC3159315/ /pubmed/21836339 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0301-4738.83610 Text en Copyright: © Indian Journal of Ophthalmology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Maiti, Aniruddha
Uparkar, Mahesh
Natarajan, Sundaram
Borse, Nishikanth
Walinjkar, Jaydeep
Principal components’ analysis of multifocal electroretinogram in retinitis pigmentosa
title Principal components’ analysis of multifocal electroretinogram in retinitis pigmentosa
title_full Principal components’ analysis of multifocal electroretinogram in retinitis pigmentosa
title_fullStr Principal components’ analysis of multifocal electroretinogram in retinitis pigmentosa
title_full_unstemmed Principal components’ analysis of multifocal electroretinogram in retinitis pigmentosa
title_short Principal components’ analysis of multifocal electroretinogram in retinitis pigmentosa
title_sort principal components’ analysis of multifocal electroretinogram in retinitis pigmentosa
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3159315/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21836339
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0301-4738.83610
work_keys_str_mv AT maitianiruddha principalcomponentsanalysisofmultifocalelectroretinograminretinitispigmentosa
AT uparkarmahesh principalcomponentsanalysisofmultifocalelectroretinograminretinitispigmentosa
AT natarajansundaram principalcomponentsanalysisofmultifocalelectroretinograminretinitispigmentosa
AT borsenishikanth principalcomponentsanalysisofmultifocalelectroretinograminretinitispigmentosa
AT walinjkarjaydeep principalcomponentsanalysisofmultifocalelectroretinograminretinitispigmentosa