Cargando…
Interconversion between bound and free conformations of LexA orchestrates the bacterial SOS response
The bacterial SOS response is essential for the maintenance of genomes, and also modulates antibiotic resistance and controls multidrug tolerance in subpopulations of cells known as persisters. In Escherichia coli, the SOS system is controlled by the interplay of the dimeric LexA transcriptional rep...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3159453/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21576225 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkr265 |
_version_ | 1782210471090192384 |
---|---|
author | Butala, Matej Klose, Daniel Hodnik, Vesna Rems, Ana Podlesek, Zdravko Klare, Johann P. Anderluh, Gregor Busby, Stephen J. W. Steinhoff, Heinz-Jürgen Žgur-Bertok, Darja |
author_facet | Butala, Matej Klose, Daniel Hodnik, Vesna Rems, Ana Podlesek, Zdravko Klare, Johann P. Anderluh, Gregor Busby, Stephen J. W. Steinhoff, Heinz-Jürgen Žgur-Bertok, Darja |
author_sort | Butala, Matej |
collection | PubMed |
description | The bacterial SOS response is essential for the maintenance of genomes, and also modulates antibiotic resistance and controls multidrug tolerance in subpopulations of cells known as persisters. In Escherichia coli, the SOS system is controlled by the interplay of the dimeric LexA transcriptional repressor with an inducer, the active RecA filament, which forms at sites of DNA damage and activates LexA for self-cleavage. Our aim was to understand how RecA filament formation at any chromosomal location can induce the SOS system, which could explain the mechanism for precise timing of induction of SOS genes. Here, we show that stimulated self-cleavage of the LexA repressor is prevented by binding to specific DNA operator targets. Distance measurements using pulse electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy reveal that in unbound LexA, the DNA-binding domains sample different conformations. One of these conformations is captured when LexA is bound to operator targets and this precludes interaction by RecA. Hence, the conformational flexibility of unbound LexA is the key element in establishing a co-ordinated SOS response. We show that, while LexA exhibits diverse dissociation rates from operators, it interacts extremely rapidly with DNA target sites. Modulation of LexA activity changes the occurrence of persister cells in bacterial populations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3159453 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-31594532011-08-22 Interconversion between bound and free conformations of LexA orchestrates the bacterial SOS response Butala, Matej Klose, Daniel Hodnik, Vesna Rems, Ana Podlesek, Zdravko Klare, Johann P. Anderluh, Gregor Busby, Stephen J. W. Steinhoff, Heinz-Jürgen Žgur-Bertok, Darja Nucleic Acids Res Genome Integrity, Repair and Replication The bacterial SOS response is essential for the maintenance of genomes, and also modulates antibiotic resistance and controls multidrug tolerance in subpopulations of cells known as persisters. In Escherichia coli, the SOS system is controlled by the interplay of the dimeric LexA transcriptional repressor with an inducer, the active RecA filament, which forms at sites of DNA damage and activates LexA for self-cleavage. Our aim was to understand how RecA filament formation at any chromosomal location can induce the SOS system, which could explain the mechanism for precise timing of induction of SOS genes. Here, we show that stimulated self-cleavage of the LexA repressor is prevented by binding to specific DNA operator targets. Distance measurements using pulse electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy reveal that in unbound LexA, the DNA-binding domains sample different conformations. One of these conformations is captured when LexA is bound to operator targets and this precludes interaction by RecA. Hence, the conformational flexibility of unbound LexA is the key element in establishing a co-ordinated SOS response. We show that, while LexA exhibits diverse dissociation rates from operators, it interacts extremely rapidly with DNA target sites. Modulation of LexA activity changes the occurrence of persister cells in bacterial populations. Oxford University Press 2011-08 2011-05-16 /pmc/articles/PMC3159453/ /pubmed/21576225 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkr265 Text en © The Author(s) 2011. Published by Oxford University Press. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Genome Integrity, Repair and Replication Butala, Matej Klose, Daniel Hodnik, Vesna Rems, Ana Podlesek, Zdravko Klare, Johann P. Anderluh, Gregor Busby, Stephen J. W. Steinhoff, Heinz-Jürgen Žgur-Bertok, Darja Interconversion between bound and free conformations of LexA orchestrates the bacterial SOS response |
title | Interconversion between bound and free conformations of LexA orchestrates the bacterial SOS response |
title_full | Interconversion between bound and free conformations of LexA orchestrates the bacterial SOS response |
title_fullStr | Interconversion between bound and free conformations of LexA orchestrates the bacterial SOS response |
title_full_unstemmed | Interconversion between bound and free conformations of LexA orchestrates the bacterial SOS response |
title_short | Interconversion between bound and free conformations of LexA orchestrates the bacterial SOS response |
title_sort | interconversion between bound and free conformations of lexa orchestrates the bacterial sos response |
topic | Genome Integrity, Repair and Replication |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3159453/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21576225 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkr265 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT butalamatej interconversionbetweenboundandfreeconformationsoflexaorchestratesthebacterialsosresponse AT klosedaniel interconversionbetweenboundandfreeconformationsoflexaorchestratesthebacterialsosresponse AT hodnikvesna interconversionbetweenboundandfreeconformationsoflexaorchestratesthebacterialsosresponse AT remsana interconversionbetweenboundandfreeconformationsoflexaorchestratesthebacterialsosresponse AT podlesekzdravko interconversionbetweenboundandfreeconformationsoflexaorchestratesthebacterialsosresponse AT klarejohannp interconversionbetweenboundandfreeconformationsoflexaorchestratesthebacterialsosresponse AT anderluhgregor interconversionbetweenboundandfreeconformationsoflexaorchestratesthebacterialsosresponse AT busbystephenjw interconversionbetweenboundandfreeconformationsoflexaorchestratesthebacterialsosresponse AT steinhoffheinzjurgen interconversionbetweenboundandfreeconformationsoflexaorchestratesthebacterialsosresponse AT zgurbertokdarja interconversionbetweenboundandfreeconformationsoflexaorchestratesthebacterialsosresponse |