Cargando…

Should patents for antiretrovirals be waived in the developing world? Annual varsity medical debate - London, 21 January 2011

The 2011 Varsity Medical Debate, between Oxford and Cambridge Universities, brought students and faculty together to discuss the waiving of patents for antiretroviral therapies in the developing world. With an estimated 29.5 million infected by Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) in low- and middle-i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Corrick, Fenella, Watson, Robert, Budhdeo, Sanjay
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3160882/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21740573
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1747-5341-6-13
_version_ 1782210597208719360
author Corrick, Fenella
Watson, Robert
Budhdeo, Sanjay
author_facet Corrick, Fenella
Watson, Robert
Budhdeo, Sanjay
author_sort Corrick, Fenella
collection PubMed
description The 2011 Varsity Medical Debate, between Oxford and Cambridge Universities, brought students and faculty together to discuss the waiving of patents for antiretroviral therapies in the developing world. With an estimated 29.5 million infected by Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) in low- and middle-income countries and only 5.3 million of those being treated, the effective and equitable distribution of anti-retroviral therapy (ART) is an issue of great importance. The debate centred around three areas of contention. Firstly, there was disagreement about whether patents were the real barrier to the access of anti-retroviral therapy in the developing world. Secondly, there were differing views on the effectiveness of a patent pool. Thirdly, concerns were raised over the impact of waiving patents on research to produce new and better anti retro-viral drugs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3160882
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31608822011-08-25 Should patents for antiretrovirals be waived in the developing world? Annual varsity medical debate - London, 21 January 2011 Corrick, Fenella Watson, Robert Budhdeo, Sanjay Philos Ethics Humanit Med Meeting Report The 2011 Varsity Medical Debate, between Oxford and Cambridge Universities, brought students and faculty together to discuss the waiving of patents for antiretroviral therapies in the developing world. With an estimated 29.5 million infected by Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) in low- and middle-income countries and only 5.3 million of those being treated, the effective and equitable distribution of anti-retroviral therapy (ART) is an issue of great importance. The debate centred around three areas of contention. Firstly, there was disagreement about whether patents were the real barrier to the access of anti-retroviral therapy in the developing world. Secondly, there were differing views on the effectiveness of a patent pool. Thirdly, concerns were raised over the impact of waiving patents on research to produce new and better anti retro-viral drugs. BioMed Central 2011-07-08 /pmc/articles/PMC3160882/ /pubmed/21740573 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1747-5341-6-13 Text en Copyright ©2011 Corrick et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Meeting Report
Corrick, Fenella
Watson, Robert
Budhdeo, Sanjay
Should patents for antiretrovirals be waived in the developing world? Annual varsity medical debate - London, 21 January 2011
title Should patents for antiretrovirals be waived in the developing world? Annual varsity medical debate - London, 21 January 2011
title_full Should patents for antiretrovirals be waived in the developing world? Annual varsity medical debate - London, 21 January 2011
title_fullStr Should patents for antiretrovirals be waived in the developing world? Annual varsity medical debate - London, 21 January 2011
title_full_unstemmed Should patents for antiretrovirals be waived in the developing world? Annual varsity medical debate - London, 21 January 2011
title_short Should patents for antiretrovirals be waived in the developing world? Annual varsity medical debate - London, 21 January 2011
title_sort should patents for antiretrovirals be waived in the developing world? annual varsity medical debate - london, 21 january 2011
topic Meeting Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3160882/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21740573
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1747-5341-6-13
work_keys_str_mv AT corrickfenella shouldpatentsforantiretroviralsbewaivedinthedevelopingworldannualvarsitymedicaldebatelondon21january2011
AT watsonrobert shouldpatentsforantiretroviralsbewaivedinthedevelopingworldannualvarsitymedicaldebatelondon21january2011
AT budhdeosanjay shouldpatentsforantiretroviralsbewaivedinthedevelopingworldannualvarsitymedicaldebatelondon21january2011