Cargando…

Intermittent Screening and Treatment versus Intermittent Preventive Treatment of Malaria in Pregnancy: Provider Knowledge and Acceptability

Malaria in pregnancy (MiP) is associated with increased risks of maternal and foetal complications. The WHO recommends a package of interventions including intermittent preventive treatment (IPT) with sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP), insecticide-treated nets and effective case management. However, w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Smith Paintain, Lucy, Antwi, Gifty D., Jones, Caroline, Amoako, Esther, Adjei, Rose O., Afrah, Nana A., Greenwood, Brian, Chandramohan, Daniel, Tagbor, Harry, Webster, Jayne
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3161113/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21887367
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0024035
_version_ 1782210644199604224
author Smith Paintain, Lucy
Antwi, Gifty D.
Jones, Caroline
Amoako, Esther
Adjei, Rose O.
Afrah, Nana A.
Greenwood, Brian
Chandramohan, Daniel
Tagbor, Harry
Webster, Jayne
author_facet Smith Paintain, Lucy
Antwi, Gifty D.
Jones, Caroline
Amoako, Esther
Adjei, Rose O.
Afrah, Nana A.
Greenwood, Brian
Chandramohan, Daniel
Tagbor, Harry
Webster, Jayne
author_sort Smith Paintain, Lucy
collection PubMed
description Malaria in pregnancy (MiP) is associated with increased risks of maternal and foetal complications. The WHO recommends a package of interventions including intermittent preventive treatment (IPT) with sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP), insecticide-treated nets and effective case management. However, with increasing SP resistance, the effectiveness of SP-IPT has been questioned. Intermittent screening and treatment (IST) has recently been shown in Ghana to be as efficacious as SP-IPT. This study investigates two important requirements for effective delivery of IST and SP-IPT: antenatal care (ANC) provider knowledge, and acceptance of the different strategies. Structured interviews with 134 ANC providers at 67 public health facilities in Ashanti Region, Ghana collected information on knowledge of the risks and preventative and curative interventions against MiP. Composite indicators of knowledge of SP-IPT, and case management of MiP were developed. Log binomial regression of predictors of provider knowledge was explored. Qualitative data were collected through in-depth interviews with fourteen ANC providers with some knowledge of IST to gain an indication of the factors influencing acceptance of the IST approach. 88.1% of providers knew all elements of the SP-IPT policy, compared to 20.1% and 41.8% who knew the treatment policy for malaria in the first or second/third trimesters, respectively. Workshop attendance was a univariate predictor of each knowledge indicator. Qualitative findings suggest preference for prevention over cure, and increased workload may be barriers to IST implementation. However, a change in strategy in the face of SP resistance is likely to be supported; health of pregnant women is a strong motivation for ANC provider practice. If IST was to be introduced as part of routine ANC activities, attention would need to be given to improving the knowledge and practices of ANC staff in relation to appropriate treatment of MiP. Health worker support for any MiP intervention delivered through ANC clinics is critical.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3161113
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31611132011-09-01 Intermittent Screening and Treatment versus Intermittent Preventive Treatment of Malaria in Pregnancy: Provider Knowledge and Acceptability Smith Paintain, Lucy Antwi, Gifty D. Jones, Caroline Amoako, Esther Adjei, Rose O. Afrah, Nana A. Greenwood, Brian Chandramohan, Daniel Tagbor, Harry Webster, Jayne PLoS One Research Article Malaria in pregnancy (MiP) is associated with increased risks of maternal and foetal complications. The WHO recommends a package of interventions including intermittent preventive treatment (IPT) with sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP), insecticide-treated nets and effective case management. However, with increasing SP resistance, the effectiveness of SP-IPT has been questioned. Intermittent screening and treatment (IST) has recently been shown in Ghana to be as efficacious as SP-IPT. This study investigates two important requirements for effective delivery of IST and SP-IPT: antenatal care (ANC) provider knowledge, and acceptance of the different strategies. Structured interviews with 134 ANC providers at 67 public health facilities in Ashanti Region, Ghana collected information on knowledge of the risks and preventative and curative interventions against MiP. Composite indicators of knowledge of SP-IPT, and case management of MiP were developed. Log binomial regression of predictors of provider knowledge was explored. Qualitative data were collected through in-depth interviews with fourteen ANC providers with some knowledge of IST to gain an indication of the factors influencing acceptance of the IST approach. 88.1% of providers knew all elements of the SP-IPT policy, compared to 20.1% and 41.8% who knew the treatment policy for malaria in the first or second/third trimesters, respectively. Workshop attendance was a univariate predictor of each knowledge indicator. Qualitative findings suggest preference for prevention over cure, and increased workload may be barriers to IST implementation. However, a change in strategy in the face of SP resistance is likely to be supported; health of pregnant women is a strong motivation for ANC provider practice. If IST was to be introduced as part of routine ANC activities, attention would need to be given to improving the knowledge and practices of ANC staff in relation to appropriate treatment of MiP. Health worker support for any MiP intervention delivered through ANC clinics is critical. Public Library of Science 2011-08-24 /pmc/articles/PMC3161113/ /pubmed/21887367 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0024035 Text en Smith Paintain et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Smith Paintain, Lucy
Antwi, Gifty D.
Jones, Caroline
Amoako, Esther
Adjei, Rose O.
Afrah, Nana A.
Greenwood, Brian
Chandramohan, Daniel
Tagbor, Harry
Webster, Jayne
Intermittent Screening and Treatment versus Intermittent Preventive Treatment of Malaria in Pregnancy: Provider Knowledge and Acceptability
title Intermittent Screening and Treatment versus Intermittent Preventive Treatment of Malaria in Pregnancy: Provider Knowledge and Acceptability
title_full Intermittent Screening and Treatment versus Intermittent Preventive Treatment of Malaria in Pregnancy: Provider Knowledge and Acceptability
title_fullStr Intermittent Screening and Treatment versus Intermittent Preventive Treatment of Malaria in Pregnancy: Provider Knowledge and Acceptability
title_full_unstemmed Intermittent Screening and Treatment versus Intermittent Preventive Treatment of Malaria in Pregnancy: Provider Knowledge and Acceptability
title_short Intermittent Screening and Treatment versus Intermittent Preventive Treatment of Malaria in Pregnancy: Provider Knowledge and Acceptability
title_sort intermittent screening and treatment versus intermittent preventive treatment of malaria in pregnancy: provider knowledge and acceptability
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3161113/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21887367
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0024035
work_keys_str_mv AT smithpaintainlucy intermittentscreeningandtreatmentversusintermittentpreventivetreatmentofmalariainpregnancyproviderknowledgeandacceptability
AT antwigiftyd intermittentscreeningandtreatmentversusintermittentpreventivetreatmentofmalariainpregnancyproviderknowledgeandacceptability
AT jonescaroline intermittentscreeningandtreatmentversusintermittentpreventivetreatmentofmalariainpregnancyproviderknowledgeandacceptability
AT amoakoesther intermittentscreeningandtreatmentversusintermittentpreventivetreatmentofmalariainpregnancyproviderknowledgeandacceptability
AT adjeiroseo intermittentscreeningandtreatmentversusintermittentpreventivetreatmentofmalariainpregnancyproviderknowledgeandacceptability
AT afrahnanaa intermittentscreeningandtreatmentversusintermittentpreventivetreatmentofmalariainpregnancyproviderknowledgeandacceptability
AT greenwoodbrian intermittentscreeningandtreatmentversusintermittentpreventivetreatmentofmalariainpregnancyproviderknowledgeandacceptability
AT chandramohandaniel intermittentscreeningandtreatmentversusintermittentpreventivetreatmentofmalariainpregnancyproviderknowledgeandacceptability
AT tagborharry intermittentscreeningandtreatmentversusintermittentpreventivetreatmentofmalariainpregnancyproviderknowledgeandacceptability
AT websterjayne intermittentscreeningandtreatmentversusintermittentpreventivetreatmentofmalariainpregnancyproviderknowledgeandacceptability