Cargando…
Two-Step Approach for the Prediction of Future Type 2 Diabetes Risk
OBJECTIVE: To develop a model for the prediction of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) risk on the basis of a multivariate logistic model and 1-h plasma glucose concentration (1-h PG). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: The model was developed in a cohort of 1,562 nondiabetic subjects from the San Antonio He...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Diabetes Association
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3161295/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21788628 http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc10-2201 |
_version_ | 1782210670634205184 |
---|---|
author | Abdul-Ghani, Muhammad A. Abdul-Ghani, Tamam Stern, Michael P. Karavic, Jasmina Tuomi, Tiinamaija Bo, Insoma DeFronzo, Ralph A. Groop, Leif |
author_facet | Abdul-Ghani, Muhammad A. Abdul-Ghani, Tamam Stern, Michael P. Karavic, Jasmina Tuomi, Tiinamaija Bo, Insoma DeFronzo, Ralph A. Groop, Leif |
author_sort | Abdul-Ghani, Muhammad A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To develop a model for the prediction of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) risk on the basis of a multivariate logistic model and 1-h plasma glucose concentration (1-h PG). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: The model was developed in a cohort of 1,562 nondiabetic subjects from the San Antonio Heart Study (SAHS) and validated in 2,395 nondiabetic subjects in the Botnia Study. A risk score on the basis of anthropometric parameters, plasma glucose and lipid profile, and blood pressure was computed for each subject. Subjects with a risk score above a certain cut point were considered to represent high-risk individuals, and their 1-h PG concentration during the oral glucose tolerance test was used to further refine their future T2DM risk. RESULTS: We used the San Antonio Diabetes Prediction Model (SADPM) to generate the initial risk score. A risk-score value of 0.065 was found to be an optimal cut point for initial screening and selection of high-risk individuals. A 1-h PG concentration >140 mg/dL in high-risk individuals (whose risk score was >0.065) was the optimal cut point for identification of subjects at increased risk. The two cut points had 77.8, 77.4, and 44.8% (for the SAHS) and 75.8, 71.6, and 11.9% (for the Botnia Study) sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value, respectively, in the SAHS and Botnia Study. CONCLUSIONS: A two-step model, based on the combination of the SADPM and 1-h PG, is a useful tool for the identification of high-risk Mexican-American and Caucasian individuals. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3161295 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | American Diabetes Association |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-31612952012-09-01 Two-Step Approach for the Prediction of Future Type 2 Diabetes Risk Abdul-Ghani, Muhammad A. Abdul-Ghani, Tamam Stern, Michael P. Karavic, Jasmina Tuomi, Tiinamaija Bo, Insoma DeFronzo, Ralph A. Groop, Leif Diabetes Care Original Research OBJECTIVE: To develop a model for the prediction of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) risk on the basis of a multivariate logistic model and 1-h plasma glucose concentration (1-h PG). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: The model was developed in a cohort of 1,562 nondiabetic subjects from the San Antonio Heart Study (SAHS) and validated in 2,395 nondiabetic subjects in the Botnia Study. A risk score on the basis of anthropometric parameters, plasma glucose and lipid profile, and blood pressure was computed for each subject. Subjects with a risk score above a certain cut point were considered to represent high-risk individuals, and their 1-h PG concentration during the oral glucose tolerance test was used to further refine their future T2DM risk. RESULTS: We used the San Antonio Diabetes Prediction Model (SADPM) to generate the initial risk score. A risk-score value of 0.065 was found to be an optimal cut point for initial screening and selection of high-risk individuals. A 1-h PG concentration >140 mg/dL in high-risk individuals (whose risk score was >0.065) was the optimal cut point for identification of subjects at increased risk. The two cut points had 77.8, 77.4, and 44.8% (for the SAHS) and 75.8, 71.6, and 11.9% (for the Botnia Study) sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value, respectively, in the SAHS and Botnia Study. CONCLUSIONS: A two-step model, based on the combination of the SADPM and 1-h PG, is a useful tool for the identification of high-risk Mexican-American and Caucasian individuals. American Diabetes Association 2011-09 2011-08-19 /pmc/articles/PMC3161295/ /pubmed/21788628 http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc10-2201 Text en © 2011 by the American Diabetes Association. Readers may use this article as long as the work is properly cited, the use is educational and not for profit, and the work is not altered. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ for details. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Abdul-Ghani, Muhammad A. Abdul-Ghani, Tamam Stern, Michael P. Karavic, Jasmina Tuomi, Tiinamaija Bo, Insoma DeFronzo, Ralph A. Groop, Leif Two-Step Approach for the Prediction of Future Type 2 Diabetes Risk |
title | Two-Step Approach for the Prediction of Future Type 2 Diabetes Risk |
title_full | Two-Step Approach for the Prediction of Future Type 2 Diabetes Risk |
title_fullStr | Two-Step Approach for the Prediction of Future Type 2 Diabetes Risk |
title_full_unstemmed | Two-Step Approach for the Prediction of Future Type 2 Diabetes Risk |
title_short | Two-Step Approach for the Prediction of Future Type 2 Diabetes Risk |
title_sort | two-step approach for the prediction of future type 2 diabetes risk |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3161295/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21788628 http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc10-2201 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT abdulghanimuhammada twostepapproachforthepredictionoffuturetype2diabetesrisk AT abdulghanitamam twostepapproachforthepredictionoffuturetype2diabetesrisk AT sternmichaelp twostepapproachforthepredictionoffuturetype2diabetesrisk AT karavicjasmina twostepapproachforthepredictionoffuturetype2diabetesrisk AT tuomitiinamaija twostepapproachforthepredictionoffuturetype2diabetesrisk AT boinsoma twostepapproachforthepredictionoffuturetype2diabetesrisk AT defronzoralpha twostepapproachforthepredictionoffuturetype2diabetesrisk AT groopleif twostepapproachforthepredictionoffuturetype2diabetesrisk |