Cargando…
Evaluation of midkine and anterior gradient 2 in a multimarker panel for the detection of ovarian cancer
The aims of this study were: to characterise and compare plasma concentrations of midkine (MDK) in normal healthy women with concentrations observed in women with ovarian cancer; and to establish and compare the performance of MDK with that of anterior gradient 2 protein (AGR2) and CA125 in the deve...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3161349/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20525245 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-9966-29-62 |
_version_ | 1782210682855358464 |
---|---|
author | Rice, Gregory E Edgell, Tracey A Autelitano, Dominic J |
author_facet | Rice, Gregory E Edgell, Tracey A Autelitano, Dominic J |
author_sort | Rice, Gregory E |
collection | PubMed |
description | The aims of this study were: to characterise and compare plasma concentrations of midkine (MDK) in normal healthy women with concentrations observed in women with ovarian cancer; and to establish and compare the performance of MDK with that of anterior gradient 2 protein (AGR2) and CA125 in the development of multi-analyte classification algorithms for ovarian cancer. Median plasma concentrations of immunoreactive MDK, AGR2 and CA125 were significantly greater in the case cohort (909 pg/ml, 765 pg/ml and 502 U/ml, respectively n = 46) than in the control cohort (383 pg/ml, 188 pg/ml and 13 U/ml, respectively n = 61) (p < 0.001). The area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC) for MDK and AGR2 was not significantly different (0.734 ± 0.046 and 0.784 ± 0.049, respectively, mean ± SE) but were both significantly less than the AUC for CA125 (0.934 ± 0.030, p < 0.003). When subjected to stochastic gradient boosted logistic regression modelling, the AUC of the multi-analyte panel (MDK, AGR2 and CA125, 0.988 ± 0.010) was significantly greater than that of CA125 alone (0.934 ± 0.030, p = 0.035). The sensitivity and specificity of the multi-analyte algorithm were 95.2 and 97.7%, respectively. Within the study cohort, CA125 displayed a sensitivity and specificity of 87.0 and 94.6%, respectively. The data obtained in this study confirm that both MDK and AGR2 individually display utility as biomarkers for ovarian cancer and that in a multi-analyte panel significantly improve the diagnostic utility of CA125 in symptomatic women. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3161349 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-31613492011-08-26 Evaluation of midkine and anterior gradient 2 in a multimarker panel for the detection of ovarian cancer Rice, Gregory E Edgell, Tracey A Autelitano, Dominic J J Exp Clin Cancer Res Research The aims of this study were: to characterise and compare plasma concentrations of midkine (MDK) in normal healthy women with concentrations observed in women with ovarian cancer; and to establish and compare the performance of MDK with that of anterior gradient 2 protein (AGR2) and CA125 in the development of multi-analyte classification algorithms for ovarian cancer. Median plasma concentrations of immunoreactive MDK, AGR2 and CA125 were significantly greater in the case cohort (909 pg/ml, 765 pg/ml and 502 U/ml, respectively n = 46) than in the control cohort (383 pg/ml, 188 pg/ml and 13 U/ml, respectively n = 61) (p < 0.001). The area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC) for MDK and AGR2 was not significantly different (0.734 ± 0.046 and 0.784 ± 0.049, respectively, mean ± SE) but were both significantly less than the AUC for CA125 (0.934 ± 0.030, p < 0.003). When subjected to stochastic gradient boosted logistic regression modelling, the AUC of the multi-analyte panel (MDK, AGR2 and CA125, 0.988 ± 0.010) was significantly greater than that of CA125 alone (0.934 ± 0.030, p = 0.035). The sensitivity and specificity of the multi-analyte algorithm were 95.2 and 97.7%, respectively. Within the study cohort, CA125 displayed a sensitivity and specificity of 87.0 and 94.6%, respectively. The data obtained in this study confirm that both MDK and AGR2 individually display utility as biomarkers for ovarian cancer and that in a multi-analyte panel significantly improve the diagnostic utility of CA125 in symptomatic women. BioMed Central 2010-06-03 /pmc/articles/PMC3161349/ /pubmed/20525245 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-9966-29-62 Text en Copyright ©2010 Rice et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Rice, Gregory E Edgell, Tracey A Autelitano, Dominic J Evaluation of midkine and anterior gradient 2 in a multimarker panel for the detection of ovarian cancer |
title | Evaluation of midkine and anterior gradient 2 in a multimarker panel for the detection of ovarian cancer |
title_full | Evaluation of midkine and anterior gradient 2 in a multimarker panel for the detection of ovarian cancer |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of midkine and anterior gradient 2 in a multimarker panel for the detection of ovarian cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of midkine and anterior gradient 2 in a multimarker panel for the detection of ovarian cancer |
title_short | Evaluation of midkine and anterior gradient 2 in a multimarker panel for the detection of ovarian cancer |
title_sort | evaluation of midkine and anterior gradient 2 in a multimarker panel for the detection of ovarian cancer |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3161349/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20525245 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-9966-29-62 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ricegregorye evaluationofmidkineandanteriorgradient2inamultimarkerpanelforthedetectionofovariancancer AT edgelltraceya evaluationofmidkineandanteriorgradient2inamultimarkerpanelforthedetectionofovariancancer AT autelitanodominicj evaluationofmidkineandanteriorgradient2inamultimarkerpanelforthedetectionofovariancancer |