Cargando…

Cost-effectiveness analysis of malaria chemoprophylaxis for travellers to West-Africa

BACKGROUND: The importation of malaria to non-endemic countries remains a major cause of travel-related morbidity and a leading cause of travel-related hospitalizations. Currently they are three priority medications for malaria prophylaxis to West Africa: mefloquine, atovaquone/proguanil and doxycyc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Widmer, Lukas L, Blank, Patricia R, Van Herck, Koen, Hatz, Christoph, Schlagenhauf, Patricia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3161358/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20860809
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-10-279
_version_ 1782210684937830400
author Widmer, Lukas L
Blank, Patricia R
Van Herck, Koen
Hatz, Christoph
Schlagenhauf, Patricia
author_facet Widmer, Lukas L
Blank, Patricia R
Van Herck, Koen
Hatz, Christoph
Schlagenhauf, Patricia
author_sort Widmer, Lukas L
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The importation of malaria to non-endemic countries remains a major cause of travel-related morbidity and a leading cause of travel-related hospitalizations. Currently they are three priority medications for malaria prophylaxis to West Africa: mefloquine, atovaquone/proguanil and doxycycline. We investigate the cost effectiveness of a partial reimbursement of the cheapest effective malaria chemoprophylaxis (mefloquine) for travellers to high risk areas of malaria transmission compared with the current situation of no reimbursement. METHODS: This study is a cost-effectiveness analysis based on malaria cases imported from West Africa to Switzerland from the perspective of the Swiss health system. We used a decision tree model and made a literature research on the components of travel related malaria. The main outcome measure was the cost effectiveness of malaria chemoprophylaxis reimbursement based on malaria and deaths averted. RESULTS: Using a program where travellers would be reimbursed for 80% of the cost of the cheapest malaria chemoprophylaxis is dominant (i.e. cost saving and more effective than the current situation) using the assumption that currently 68.7% of travellers to West Africa use malaria chemoprophylaxis. If the current usage of malaria chemoprophylaxis would be higher, 82.4%, the incremental cost per malaria case averted is € 2'302. The incremental cost of malaria death averted is € 191'833. The most important factors influencing the model were: the proportion of travellers using malaria chemoprophylaxis, the probability of contracting malaria without malaria chemoprophylaxis, the cost of the mefloquine regimen, the decrease in the number of travellers without malaria chemoprophylaxis in the reimbursement strategy. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that a reimbursement of 80% of the cost of the cheapest effective malaria chemoprophylaxis (mefloquine) for travellers from Switzerland to West Africa is highly effective in terms of malaria cases averted and is cost effective to the Swiss health system. These data are relevant to discussions about the cost effectiveness of malaria chemoprophylaxis reimbursement for vulnerable groups such as those visiting friends and relatives who have the highest risk of malaria, who are least likely to use chemoprophylaxis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3161358
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31613582011-08-26 Cost-effectiveness analysis of malaria chemoprophylaxis for travellers to West-Africa Widmer, Lukas L Blank, Patricia R Van Herck, Koen Hatz, Christoph Schlagenhauf, Patricia BMC Infect Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: The importation of malaria to non-endemic countries remains a major cause of travel-related morbidity and a leading cause of travel-related hospitalizations. Currently they are three priority medications for malaria prophylaxis to West Africa: mefloquine, atovaquone/proguanil and doxycycline. We investigate the cost effectiveness of a partial reimbursement of the cheapest effective malaria chemoprophylaxis (mefloquine) for travellers to high risk areas of malaria transmission compared with the current situation of no reimbursement. METHODS: This study is a cost-effectiveness analysis based on malaria cases imported from West Africa to Switzerland from the perspective of the Swiss health system. We used a decision tree model and made a literature research on the components of travel related malaria. The main outcome measure was the cost effectiveness of malaria chemoprophylaxis reimbursement based on malaria and deaths averted. RESULTS: Using a program where travellers would be reimbursed for 80% of the cost of the cheapest malaria chemoprophylaxis is dominant (i.e. cost saving and more effective than the current situation) using the assumption that currently 68.7% of travellers to West Africa use malaria chemoprophylaxis. If the current usage of malaria chemoprophylaxis would be higher, 82.4%, the incremental cost per malaria case averted is € 2'302. The incremental cost of malaria death averted is € 191'833. The most important factors influencing the model were: the proportion of travellers using malaria chemoprophylaxis, the probability of contracting malaria without malaria chemoprophylaxis, the cost of the mefloquine regimen, the decrease in the number of travellers without malaria chemoprophylaxis in the reimbursement strategy. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that a reimbursement of 80% of the cost of the cheapest effective malaria chemoprophylaxis (mefloquine) for travellers from Switzerland to West Africa is highly effective in terms of malaria cases averted and is cost effective to the Swiss health system. These data are relevant to discussions about the cost effectiveness of malaria chemoprophylaxis reimbursement for vulnerable groups such as those visiting friends and relatives who have the highest risk of malaria, who are least likely to use chemoprophylaxis. BioMed Central 2010-09-22 /pmc/articles/PMC3161358/ /pubmed/20860809 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-10-279 Text en Copyright ©2010 Widmer et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Widmer, Lukas L
Blank, Patricia R
Van Herck, Koen
Hatz, Christoph
Schlagenhauf, Patricia
Cost-effectiveness analysis of malaria chemoprophylaxis for travellers to West-Africa
title Cost-effectiveness analysis of malaria chemoprophylaxis for travellers to West-Africa
title_full Cost-effectiveness analysis of malaria chemoprophylaxis for travellers to West-Africa
title_fullStr Cost-effectiveness analysis of malaria chemoprophylaxis for travellers to West-Africa
title_full_unstemmed Cost-effectiveness analysis of malaria chemoprophylaxis for travellers to West-Africa
title_short Cost-effectiveness analysis of malaria chemoprophylaxis for travellers to West-Africa
title_sort cost-effectiveness analysis of malaria chemoprophylaxis for travellers to west-africa
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3161358/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20860809
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-10-279
work_keys_str_mv AT widmerlukasl costeffectivenessanalysisofmalariachemoprophylaxisfortravellerstowestafrica
AT blankpatriciar costeffectivenessanalysisofmalariachemoprophylaxisfortravellerstowestafrica
AT vanherckkoen costeffectivenessanalysisofmalariachemoprophylaxisfortravellerstowestafrica
AT hatzchristoph costeffectivenessanalysisofmalariachemoprophylaxisfortravellerstowestafrica
AT schlagenhaufpatricia costeffectivenessanalysisofmalariachemoprophylaxisfortravellerstowestafrica