Cargando…

The outcome of proliferative lupus nephritis with pulse cyclophosphamide therapy

Proliferative lupus nephritis deserves aggressive therapy and cyclophosphamide plays a pivotal role. Thirty nine patients with proliferative lupus nephritis (Class III-7 patients and Class IV- 32 patients) with a median follow up of 38 months were considered for this observational study. All the pat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Annavarajula, S. K., Murty, K. V. D., Prayaga, A., Das, U., Desai, M., Narain, C. A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3161432/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21886974
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-4065.83933
_version_ 1782210695872380928
author Annavarajula, S. K.
Murty, K. V. D.
Prayaga, A.
Das, U.
Desai, M.
Narain, C. A.
author_facet Annavarajula, S. K.
Murty, K. V. D.
Prayaga, A.
Das, U.
Desai, M.
Narain, C. A.
author_sort Annavarajula, S. K.
collection PubMed
description Proliferative lupus nephritis deserves aggressive therapy and cyclophosphamide plays a pivotal role. Thirty nine patients with proliferative lupus nephritis (Class III-7 patients and Class IV- 32 patients) with a median follow up of 38 months were considered for this observational study. All the patients received induction therapy with intravenous methylprednisolone. Cyclophosphamide was given intravenously initially in monthly pulses for six months and later quarterly pulses until remission was achieved or until the target dose (200 mg/kg) was reached. The treatment with intravenous methylprednisolone was repeated in the event of a nephritic flare. Later the corticosteroid was reduced to a minimum effective dose and cyclophosphamide was changed to either azathioprine or mycophenolate mofetil. At the time of the last follow up, 82.05% of the patients were in remission (complete remission 51.28% and partial remission 30.77%). The median interval to achieve remission in responders was 15 months. Early diagnosis (P=0.04), a higher creatinine clearance at presentation (P=0.02), and concurrent use of an ACEI or an ARB (P=007) significantly favored attaining remission. Five patients experienced a doubling of serum creatinine and one of them became dialysis dependent. Risk of doubling of serum creatinine correlated with a low Ccr (P=0.03) at presentation, occurrence of renal flares (P=0.034) and failure to achieve remission (P=0.0001). The parameters like serum creatinine, serum C3, serum C4, activity and chronicity indices on renal biopsy, hypertension were not statistically significant. Therapy with cyclophosphamide, if initiated early, helps in inducing remission and hence can retard the progression to CKD.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3161432
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Medknow Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31614322011-09-01 The outcome of proliferative lupus nephritis with pulse cyclophosphamide therapy Annavarajula, S. K. Murty, K. V. D. Prayaga, A. Das, U. Desai, M. Narain, C. A. Indian J Nephrol Original Article Proliferative lupus nephritis deserves aggressive therapy and cyclophosphamide plays a pivotal role. Thirty nine patients with proliferative lupus nephritis (Class III-7 patients and Class IV- 32 patients) with a median follow up of 38 months were considered for this observational study. All the patients received induction therapy with intravenous methylprednisolone. Cyclophosphamide was given intravenously initially in monthly pulses for six months and later quarterly pulses until remission was achieved or until the target dose (200 mg/kg) was reached. The treatment with intravenous methylprednisolone was repeated in the event of a nephritic flare. Later the corticosteroid was reduced to a minimum effective dose and cyclophosphamide was changed to either azathioprine or mycophenolate mofetil. At the time of the last follow up, 82.05% of the patients were in remission (complete remission 51.28% and partial remission 30.77%). The median interval to achieve remission in responders was 15 months. Early diagnosis (P=0.04), a higher creatinine clearance at presentation (P=0.02), and concurrent use of an ACEI or an ARB (P=007) significantly favored attaining remission. Five patients experienced a doubling of serum creatinine and one of them became dialysis dependent. Risk of doubling of serum creatinine correlated with a low Ccr (P=0.03) at presentation, occurrence of renal flares (P=0.034) and failure to achieve remission (P=0.0001). The parameters like serum creatinine, serum C3, serum C4, activity and chronicity indices on renal biopsy, hypertension were not statistically significant. Therapy with cyclophosphamide, if initiated early, helps in inducing remission and hence can retard the progression to CKD. Medknow Publications 2011 /pmc/articles/PMC3161432/ /pubmed/21886974 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-4065.83933 Text en © Indian Journal of Nephrology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Annavarajula, S. K.
Murty, K. V. D.
Prayaga, A.
Das, U.
Desai, M.
Narain, C. A.
The outcome of proliferative lupus nephritis with pulse cyclophosphamide therapy
title The outcome of proliferative lupus nephritis with pulse cyclophosphamide therapy
title_full The outcome of proliferative lupus nephritis with pulse cyclophosphamide therapy
title_fullStr The outcome of proliferative lupus nephritis with pulse cyclophosphamide therapy
title_full_unstemmed The outcome of proliferative lupus nephritis with pulse cyclophosphamide therapy
title_short The outcome of proliferative lupus nephritis with pulse cyclophosphamide therapy
title_sort outcome of proliferative lupus nephritis with pulse cyclophosphamide therapy
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3161432/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21886974
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-4065.83933
work_keys_str_mv AT annavarajulask theoutcomeofproliferativelupusnephritiswithpulsecyclophosphamidetherapy
AT murtykvd theoutcomeofproliferativelupusnephritiswithpulsecyclophosphamidetherapy
AT prayagaa theoutcomeofproliferativelupusnephritiswithpulsecyclophosphamidetherapy
AT dasu theoutcomeofproliferativelupusnephritiswithpulsecyclophosphamidetherapy
AT desaim theoutcomeofproliferativelupusnephritiswithpulsecyclophosphamidetherapy
AT narainca theoutcomeofproliferativelupusnephritiswithpulsecyclophosphamidetherapy
AT annavarajulask outcomeofproliferativelupusnephritiswithpulsecyclophosphamidetherapy
AT murtykvd outcomeofproliferativelupusnephritiswithpulsecyclophosphamidetherapy
AT prayagaa outcomeofproliferativelupusnephritiswithpulsecyclophosphamidetherapy
AT dasu outcomeofproliferativelupusnephritiswithpulsecyclophosphamidetherapy
AT desaim outcomeofproliferativelupusnephritiswithpulsecyclophosphamidetherapy
AT narainca outcomeofproliferativelupusnephritiswithpulsecyclophosphamidetherapy