Cargando…
A Phantom Study on Target Localization Accuracy Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the 3-dimensional target localization accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) using an on-board imager (OBI). An anthropomorphic pelvis phantom was used to simulate a range of offsets in the three translational directions and rotations around each of...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Libertas Academica
2008
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3161626/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21892325 |
_version_ | 1782210709615017984 |
---|---|
author | Yan, Hui Zhang, Liwei Yin, Fang-Fang |
author_facet | Yan, Hui Zhang, Liwei Yin, Fang-Fang |
author_sort | Yan, Hui |
collection | PubMed |
description | The purpose of this study is to evaluate the 3-dimensional target localization accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) using an on-board imager (OBI). An anthropomorphic pelvis phantom was used to simulate a range of offsets in the three translational directions and rotations around each of the three axes. After a translational or rotational offset was applied, a CBCT scan of the phantom was followed by image registration to detect the offsets in six degrees. The detected offsets were compared to the offset actually applied to give the detection error of the phantom position. Afterwards, the phantom was positioned by automatically moving the couch based on the detected offsets. A second CBCT scan followed by image registration was performed to give the residual error of the phantom positioning. On the average the detection errors and their standard deviations along the lateral, longitudinal and vertical axis are 0.3 ± 0.1, 0.3 ± 0.1 and 0.4 ± 0.1 mm respectively with respect to translational shifts ranging from 0 to 10 mm. The corresponding residual errors after positioning are 0.3 ± 0.1, 0.5 ± 0.1 and 0.3 ± 0.1 mm. For simulated rotational shifts ranging from 0 to 5 degrees, the average detection error and their standard deviation around lateral, longitudinal, and vertical axes are 0.1 ± 0.0, 0.2 ± 0.0, and 0.2 ± 0.0 degrees respectively. The residual errors after positioning are 0.4 ± 0.1, 0.6 ± 0.1, and 0.3 ± 0.1 mm along the lateral, longitudinal and vertical directions. These results indicate that target localization based on CBCT is capable of achieving sub-millimeter accuracy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3161626 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2008 |
publisher | Libertas Academica |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-31616262011-09-02 A Phantom Study on Target Localization Accuracy Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Yan, Hui Zhang, Liwei Yin, Fang-Fang Clin Med Oncol Original Research The purpose of this study is to evaluate the 3-dimensional target localization accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) using an on-board imager (OBI). An anthropomorphic pelvis phantom was used to simulate a range of offsets in the three translational directions and rotations around each of the three axes. After a translational or rotational offset was applied, a CBCT scan of the phantom was followed by image registration to detect the offsets in six degrees. The detected offsets were compared to the offset actually applied to give the detection error of the phantom position. Afterwards, the phantom was positioned by automatically moving the couch based on the detected offsets. A second CBCT scan followed by image registration was performed to give the residual error of the phantom positioning. On the average the detection errors and their standard deviations along the lateral, longitudinal and vertical axis are 0.3 ± 0.1, 0.3 ± 0.1 and 0.4 ± 0.1 mm respectively with respect to translational shifts ranging from 0 to 10 mm. The corresponding residual errors after positioning are 0.3 ± 0.1, 0.5 ± 0.1 and 0.3 ± 0.1 mm. For simulated rotational shifts ranging from 0 to 5 degrees, the average detection error and their standard deviation around lateral, longitudinal, and vertical axes are 0.1 ± 0.0, 0.2 ± 0.0, and 0.2 ± 0.0 degrees respectively. The residual errors after positioning are 0.4 ± 0.1, 0.6 ± 0.1, and 0.3 ± 0.1 mm along the lateral, longitudinal and vertical directions. These results indicate that target localization based on CBCT is capable of achieving sub-millimeter accuracy. Libertas Academica 2008-08-18 /pmc/articles/PMC3161626/ /pubmed/21892325 Text en © 2008 the author(s), publisher and licensee Libertas Academica Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0 This article is an open-access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Yan, Hui Zhang, Liwei Yin, Fang-Fang A Phantom Study on Target Localization Accuracy Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography |
title | A Phantom Study on Target Localization Accuracy Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography |
title_full | A Phantom Study on Target Localization Accuracy Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography |
title_fullStr | A Phantom Study on Target Localization Accuracy Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography |
title_full_unstemmed | A Phantom Study on Target Localization Accuracy Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography |
title_short | A Phantom Study on Target Localization Accuracy Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography |
title_sort | phantom study on target localization accuracy using cone-beam computed tomography |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3161626/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21892325 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yanhui aphantomstudyontargetlocalizationaccuracyusingconebeamcomputedtomography AT zhangliwei aphantomstudyontargetlocalizationaccuracyusingconebeamcomputedtomography AT yinfangfang aphantomstudyontargetlocalizationaccuracyusingconebeamcomputedtomography AT yanhui phantomstudyontargetlocalizationaccuracyusingconebeamcomputedtomography AT zhangliwei phantomstudyontargetlocalizationaccuracyusingconebeamcomputedtomography AT yinfangfang phantomstudyontargetlocalizationaccuracyusingconebeamcomputedtomography |