Cargando…

A Phantom Study on Target Localization Accuracy Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the 3-dimensional target localization accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) using an on-board imager (OBI). An anthropomorphic pelvis phantom was used to simulate a range of offsets in the three translational directions and rotations around each of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yan, Hui, Zhang, Liwei, Yin, Fang-Fang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Libertas Academica 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3161626/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21892325
_version_ 1782210709615017984
author Yan, Hui
Zhang, Liwei
Yin, Fang-Fang
author_facet Yan, Hui
Zhang, Liwei
Yin, Fang-Fang
author_sort Yan, Hui
collection PubMed
description The purpose of this study is to evaluate the 3-dimensional target localization accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) using an on-board imager (OBI). An anthropomorphic pelvis phantom was used to simulate a range of offsets in the three translational directions and rotations around each of the three axes. After a translational or rotational offset was applied, a CBCT scan of the phantom was followed by image registration to detect the offsets in six degrees. The detected offsets were compared to the offset actually applied to give the detection error of the phantom position. Afterwards, the phantom was positioned by automatically moving the couch based on the detected offsets. A second CBCT scan followed by image registration was performed to give the residual error of the phantom positioning. On the average the detection errors and their standard deviations along the lateral, longitudinal and vertical axis are 0.3 ± 0.1, 0.3 ± 0.1 and 0.4 ± 0.1 mm respectively with respect to translational shifts ranging from 0 to 10 mm. The corresponding residual errors after positioning are 0.3 ± 0.1, 0.5 ± 0.1 and 0.3 ± 0.1 mm. For simulated rotational shifts ranging from 0 to 5 degrees, the average detection error and their standard deviation around lateral, longitudinal, and vertical axes are 0.1 ± 0.0, 0.2 ± 0.0, and 0.2 ± 0.0 degrees respectively. The residual errors after positioning are 0.4 ± 0.1, 0.6 ± 0.1, and 0.3 ± 0.1 mm along the lateral, longitudinal and vertical directions. These results indicate that target localization based on CBCT is capable of achieving sub-millimeter accuracy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3161626
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher Libertas Academica
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31616262011-09-02 A Phantom Study on Target Localization Accuracy Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Yan, Hui Zhang, Liwei Yin, Fang-Fang Clin Med Oncol Original Research The purpose of this study is to evaluate the 3-dimensional target localization accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) using an on-board imager (OBI). An anthropomorphic pelvis phantom was used to simulate a range of offsets in the three translational directions and rotations around each of the three axes. After a translational or rotational offset was applied, a CBCT scan of the phantom was followed by image registration to detect the offsets in six degrees. The detected offsets were compared to the offset actually applied to give the detection error of the phantom position. Afterwards, the phantom was positioned by automatically moving the couch based on the detected offsets. A second CBCT scan followed by image registration was performed to give the residual error of the phantom positioning. On the average the detection errors and their standard deviations along the lateral, longitudinal and vertical axis are 0.3 ± 0.1, 0.3 ± 0.1 and 0.4 ± 0.1 mm respectively with respect to translational shifts ranging from 0 to 10 mm. The corresponding residual errors after positioning are 0.3 ± 0.1, 0.5 ± 0.1 and 0.3 ± 0.1 mm. For simulated rotational shifts ranging from 0 to 5 degrees, the average detection error and their standard deviation around lateral, longitudinal, and vertical axes are 0.1 ± 0.0, 0.2 ± 0.0, and 0.2 ± 0.0 degrees respectively. The residual errors after positioning are 0.4 ± 0.1, 0.6 ± 0.1, and 0.3 ± 0.1 mm along the lateral, longitudinal and vertical directions. These results indicate that target localization based on CBCT is capable of achieving sub-millimeter accuracy. Libertas Academica 2008-08-18 /pmc/articles/PMC3161626/ /pubmed/21892325 Text en © 2008 the author(s), publisher and licensee Libertas Academica Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0 This article is an open-access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).
spellingShingle Original Research
Yan, Hui
Zhang, Liwei
Yin, Fang-Fang
A Phantom Study on Target Localization Accuracy Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography
title A Phantom Study on Target Localization Accuracy Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography
title_full A Phantom Study on Target Localization Accuracy Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography
title_fullStr A Phantom Study on Target Localization Accuracy Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography
title_full_unstemmed A Phantom Study on Target Localization Accuracy Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography
title_short A Phantom Study on Target Localization Accuracy Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography
title_sort phantom study on target localization accuracy using cone-beam computed tomography
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3161626/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21892325
work_keys_str_mv AT yanhui aphantomstudyontargetlocalizationaccuracyusingconebeamcomputedtomography
AT zhangliwei aphantomstudyontargetlocalizationaccuracyusingconebeamcomputedtomography
AT yinfangfang aphantomstudyontargetlocalizationaccuracyusingconebeamcomputedtomography
AT yanhui phantomstudyontargetlocalizationaccuracyusingconebeamcomputedtomography
AT zhangliwei phantomstudyontargetlocalizationaccuracyusingconebeamcomputedtomography
AT yinfangfang phantomstudyontargetlocalizationaccuracyusingconebeamcomputedtomography