Cargando…

Should We Consider Cancers as Embryonic Diseases or as Consequences of Stem-Cell Deregulation?

Cancers have long been described as the result of successive selections of somatic cells progressively acquiring growth and survival advantages. Such a model was hardly compatible with the obvious heterogeneity of the cancer cell population present in tumors. This heterogeneity rather suggests that...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bastid, Jérémy, Puisieux, Alain, Ansieau, Stéphane
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Libertas Academica 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3161693/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21892299
_version_ 1782210724429299712
author Bastid, Jérémy
Puisieux, Alain
Ansieau, Stéphane
author_facet Bastid, Jérémy
Puisieux, Alain
Ansieau, Stéphane
author_sort Bastid, Jérémy
collection PubMed
description Cancers have long been described as the result of successive selections of somatic cells progressively acquiring growth and survival advantages. Such a model was hardly compatible with the obvious heterogeneity of the cancer cell population present in tumors. This heterogeneity rather suggests that mutations hint multipotent cells that, in addition to the resulting proliferation and survival advantages, display differentiation capabilities. Adult stem cells or progenitors display similar properties, supporting the concept that cancers actually originate from these cells. The recent observation that differentiated cells can dedifferentiate and acquire stemness properties suggests an alternative and additional explanation for the origin of “cancer-initiating” cells and reopens the debate of the contribution of somatic cells to cancer progression.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3161693
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher Libertas Academica
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31616932011-09-02 Should We Consider Cancers as Embryonic Diseases or as Consequences of Stem-Cell Deregulation? Bastid, Jérémy Puisieux, Alain Ansieau, Stéphane Clin Med Oncol Commentary Cancers have long been described as the result of successive selections of somatic cells progressively acquiring growth and survival advantages. Such a model was hardly compatible with the obvious heterogeneity of the cancer cell population present in tumors. This heterogeneity rather suggests that mutations hint multipotent cells that, in addition to the resulting proliferation and survival advantages, display differentiation capabilities. Adult stem cells or progenitors display similar properties, supporting the concept that cancers actually originate from these cells. The recent observation that differentiated cells can dedifferentiate and acquire stemness properties suggests an alternative and additional explanation for the origin of “cancer-initiating” cells and reopens the debate of the contribution of somatic cells to cancer progression. Libertas Academica 2008-04-29 /pmc/articles/PMC3161693/ /pubmed/21892299 Text en © 2008 the author(s), publisher and licensee Libertas Academica Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0 This article is an open-access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).
spellingShingle Commentary
Bastid, Jérémy
Puisieux, Alain
Ansieau, Stéphane
Should We Consider Cancers as Embryonic Diseases or as Consequences of Stem-Cell Deregulation?
title Should We Consider Cancers as Embryonic Diseases or as Consequences of Stem-Cell Deregulation?
title_full Should We Consider Cancers as Embryonic Diseases or as Consequences of Stem-Cell Deregulation?
title_fullStr Should We Consider Cancers as Embryonic Diseases or as Consequences of Stem-Cell Deregulation?
title_full_unstemmed Should We Consider Cancers as Embryonic Diseases or as Consequences of Stem-Cell Deregulation?
title_short Should We Consider Cancers as Embryonic Diseases or as Consequences of Stem-Cell Deregulation?
title_sort should we consider cancers as embryonic diseases or as consequences of stem-cell deregulation?
topic Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3161693/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21892299
work_keys_str_mv AT bastidjeremy shouldweconsidercancersasembryonicdiseasesorasconsequencesofstemcellderegulation
AT puisieuxalain shouldweconsidercancersasembryonicdiseasesorasconsequencesofstemcellderegulation
AT ansieaustephane shouldweconsidercancersasembryonicdiseasesorasconsequencesofstemcellderegulation