Cargando…

Biobanking after robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: a quality assessment of providing prostate tissue for RNA studies

BACKGROUND: RNA quality is believed to decrease with ischaemia time, and therefore open radical prostatectomy has been advantageous in allowing the retrieval of the prostate immediately after its devascularization. In contrast, robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomies (RALP) require the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dev, Harveer, Rickman, David, Sooriakumaran, Prasanna, Srivastava, Abhishek, Grover, Sonal, Leung, Robert, Kim, Robert, Kitabayashi, Naoki, Esqueva, Raquel, Park, Kyung, Padilla, Jessica, Rubin, Mark, Tewari, Ashutosh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3161873/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21791045
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1479-5876-9-121
_version_ 1782210746684276736
author Dev, Harveer
Rickman, David
Sooriakumaran, Prasanna
Srivastava, Abhishek
Grover, Sonal
Leung, Robert
Kim, Robert
Kitabayashi, Naoki
Esqueva, Raquel
Park, Kyung
Padilla, Jessica
Rubin, Mark
Tewari, Ashutosh
author_facet Dev, Harveer
Rickman, David
Sooriakumaran, Prasanna
Srivastava, Abhishek
Grover, Sonal
Leung, Robert
Kim, Robert
Kitabayashi, Naoki
Esqueva, Raquel
Park, Kyung
Padilla, Jessica
Rubin, Mark
Tewari, Ashutosh
author_sort Dev, Harveer
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: RNA quality is believed to decrease with ischaemia time, and therefore open radical prostatectomy has been advantageous in allowing the retrieval of the prostate immediately after its devascularization. In contrast, robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomies (RALP) require the completion of several operative steps before the devascularized prostate can be extirpated, casting doubt on the validity of this technique as a source for obtaining prostatic tissue. We seek to establish the integrity of our biobanking process by measuring the RNA quality of specimens derived from robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. METHODS: We describe our biobanking process and report the RNA quality of prostate specimens using advanced electrophoretic techniques (RNA Integrity Numbers, RIN). Using multivariate regression analysis we consider the impact of various clinicopathological correlates on RNA integrity. RESULTS: Our biobanking process has been used to acquire 1709 prostates, and allows us to retain approximately 40% of the prostate specimen, without compromising the histopathological evaluation of patients. We collected 186 samples from 142 biobanked prostates, and demonstrated a mean RIN of 7.25 (standard deviation 1.64) in 139 non-stromal samples, 73% of which had a RIN ≥ 7. Multivariate regression analysis revealed cell type - stromal/epithelial and benign/malignant - and prostate volume to be significant predictors of RIN, with unstandardized coefficients of 0.867(p = 0.001), 1.738(p < 0.001) and -0.690(p = 0.009) respectively. A mean warm ischaemia time of 120 min (standard deviation 30 min) was recorded, but multivariate regression analysis did not demonstrate a relationship with RIN within the timeframe of the RALP procedure. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate the robustness of our protocol - representing the concerted efforts of dedicated urology and pathology departments - in generating RNA of sufficient concentration and quality, without compromising the histopathological evaluation and diagnosis of patients. The ischaemia time associated with our prostatectomy technique using a robotic platform does not negatively impact on biobanking for RNA studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3161873
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31618732011-08-26 Biobanking after robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: a quality assessment of providing prostate tissue for RNA studies Dev, Harveer Rickman, David Sooriakumaran, Prasanna Srivastava, Abhishek Grover, Sonal Leung, Robert Kim, Robert Kitabayashi, Naoki Esqueva, Raquel Park, Kyung Padilla, Jessica Rubin, Mark Tewari, Ashutosh J Transl Med Research BACKGROUND: RNA quality is believed to decrease with ischaemia time, and therefore open radical prostatectomy has been advantageous in allowing the retrieval of the prostate immediately after its devascularization. In contrast, robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomies (RALP) require the completion of several operative steps before the devascularized prostate can be extirpated, casting doubt on the validity of this technique as a source for obtaining prostatic tissue. We seek to establish the integrity of our biobanking process by measuring the RNA quality of specimens derived from robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. METHODS: We describe our biobanking process and report the RNA quality of prostate specimens using advanced electrophoretic techniques (RNA Integrity Numbers, RIN). Using multivariate regression analysis we consider the impact of various clinicopathological correlates on RNA integrity. RESULTS: Our biobanking process has been used to acquire 1709 prostates, and allows us to retain approximately 40% of the prostate specimen, without compromising the histopathological evaluation of patients. We collected 186 samples from 142 biobanked prostates, and demonstrated a mean RIN of 7.25 (standard deviation 1.64) in 139 non-stromal samples, 73% of which had a RIN ≥ 7. Multivariate regression analysis revealed cell type - stromal/epithelial and benign/malignant - and prostate volume to be significant predictors of RIN, with unstandardized coefficients of 0.867(p = 0.001), 1.738(p < 0.001) and -0.690(p = 0.009) respectively. A mean warm ischaemia time of 120 min (standard deviation 30 min) was recorded, but multivariate regression analysis did not demonstrate a relationship with RIN within the timeframe of the RALP procedure. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate the robustness of our protocol - representing the concerted efforts of dedicated urology and pathology departments - in generating RNA of sufficient concentration and quality, without compromising the histopathological evaluation and diagnosis of patients. The ischaemia time associated with our prostatectomy technique using a robotic platform does not negatively impact on biobanking for RNA studies. BioMed Central 2011-07-26 /pmc/articles/PMC3161873/ /pubmed/21791045 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1479-5876-9-121 Text en Copyright ©2011 Dev et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Dev, Harveer
Rickman, David
Sooriakumaran, Prasanna
Srivastava, Abhishek
Grover, Sonal
Leung, Robert
Kim, Robert
Kitabayashi, Naoki
Esqueva, Raquel
Park, Kyung
Padilla, Jessica
Rubin, Mark
Tewari, Ashutosh
Biobanking after robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: a quality assessment of providing prostate tissue for RNA studies
title Biobanking after robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: a quality assessment of providing prostate tissue for RNA studies
title_full Biobanking after robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: a quality assessment of providing prostate tissue for RNA studies
title_fullStr Biobanking after robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: a quality assessment of providing prostate tissue for RNA studies
title_full_unstemmed Biobanking after robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: a quality assessment of providing prostate tissue for RNA studies
title_short Biobanking after robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: a quality assessment of providing prostate tissue for RNA studies
title_sort biobanking after robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: a quality assessment of providing prostate tissue for rna studies
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3161873/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21791045
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1479-5876-9-121
work_keys_str_mv AT devharveer biobankingafterroboticassistedradicalprostatectomyaqualityassessmentofprovidingprostatetissueforrnastudies
AT rickmandavid biobankingafterroboticassistedradicalprostatectomyaqualityassessmentofprovidingprostatetissueforrnastudies
AT sooriakumaranprasanna biobankingafterroboticassistedradicalprostatectomyaqualityassessmentofprovidingprostatetissueforrnastudies
AT srivastavaabhishek biobankingafterroboticassistedradicalprostatectomyaqualityassessmentofprovidingprostatetissueforrnastudies
AT groversonal biobankingafterroboticassistedradicalprostatectomyaqualityassessmentofprovidingprostatetissueforrnastudies
AT leungrobert biobankingafterroboticassistedradicalprostatectomyaqualityassessmentofprovidingprostatetissueforrnastudies
AT kimrobert biobankingafterroboticassistedradicalprostatectomyaqualityassessmentofprovidingprostatetissueforrnastudies
AT kitabayashinaoki biobankingafterroboticassistedradicalprostatectomyaqualityassessmentofprovidingprostatetissueforrnastudies
AT esquevaraquel biobankingafterroboticassistedradicalprostatectomyaqualityassessmentofprovidingprostatetissueforrnastudies
AT parkkyung biobankingafterroboticassistedradicalprostatectomyaqualityassessmentofprovidingprostatetissueforrnastudies
AT padillajessica biobankingafterroboticassistedradicalprostatectomyaqualityassessmentofprovidingprostatetissueforrnastudies
AT rubinmark biobankingafterroboticassistedradicalprostatectomyaqualityassessmentofprovidingprostatetissueforrnastudies
AT tewariashutosh biobankingafterroboticassistedradicalprostatectomyaqualityassessmentofprovidingprostatetissueforrnastudies