Cargando…

Quantitative radiologic criteria for the diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic literature review

BACKGROUND: Beside symptoms and clinical signs radiological findings are crucial in the diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). We investigate which quantitative radiological signs are described in the literature and which radilogical criteria are used to establish inclusion criteria in clincical...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Steurer, Johann, Roner, Simon, Gnannt, Ralph, Hodler, Juerg
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3161920/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21798008
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-12-175
_version_ 1782210757488803840
author Steurer, Johann
Roner, Simon
Gnannt, Ralph
Hodler, Juerg
author_facet Steurer, Johann
Roner, Simon
Gnannt, Ralph
Hodler, Juerg
author_sort Steurer, Johann
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Beside symptoms and clinical signs radiological findings are crucial in the diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). We investigate which quantitative radiological signs are described in the literature and which radilogical criteria are used to establish inclusion criteria in clincical studies evaluating different treatments in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. METHODS: A literature search was performed in Medline, Embase and the Cochrane library to identify papers reporting on radiological criteria to describe LSS and systematic reviews investigating the effects of different treatment modalities. RESULTS: 25 studies reporting on radiological signs of LSS and four systematic reviews related to the evaluation of different treatments were found. Ten different parameters were identified to quantify lumbar spinal stenosis. Most often reported measures for central stenosis were antero-posterior diameter (< 10 mm) and cross-sectional area (< 70 mm(2)) of spinal canal. For lateral stenosis height and depth of the lateral recess, and for foraminal stenosis the foraminal diameter were typically used. Only four of 63 primary studies included in the systematic reviews reported on quantitative measures for defining inclusion criteria of patients in prognostic studies. CONCLUSIONS: There is a need for consensus on well-defined, unambiguous radiological criteria to define lumbar spinal stenosis in order to improve diagnostic accuracy and to formulate reliable inclusion criteria for clinical studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3161920
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31619202011-08-26 Quantitative radiologic criteria for the diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic literature review Steurer, Johann Roner, Simon Gnannt, Ralph Hodler, Juerg BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: Beside symptoms and clinical signs radiological findings are crucial in the diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). We investigate which quantitative radiological signs are described in the literature and which radilogical criteria are used to establish inclusion criteria in clincical studies evaluating different treatments in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. METHODS: A literature search was performed in Medline, Embase and the Cochrane library to identify papers reporting on radiological criteria to describe LSS and systematic reviews investigating the effects of different treatment modalities. RESULTS: 25 studies reporting on radiological signs of LSS and four systematic reviews related to the evaluation of different treatments were found. Ten different parameters were identified to quantify lumbar spinal stenosis. Most often reported measures for central stenosis were antero-posterior diameter (< 10 mm) and cross-sectional area (< 70 mm(2)) of spinal canal. For lateral stenosis height and depth of the lateral recess, and for foraminal stenosis the foraminal diameter were typically used. Only four of 63 primary studies included in the systematic reviews reported on quantitative measures for defining inclusion criteria of patients in prognostic studies. CONCLUSIONS: There is a need for consensus on well-defined, unambiguous radiological criteria to define lumbar spinal stenosis in order to improve diagnostic accuracy and to formulate reliable inclusion criteria for clinical studies. BioMed Central 2011-07-28 /pmc/articles/PMC3161920/ /pubmed/21798008 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-12-175 Text en Copyright ©2011 Steurer et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Steurer, Johann
Roner, Simon
Gnannt, Ralph
Hodler, Juerg
Quantitative radiologic criteria for the diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic literature review
title Quantitative radiologic criteria for the diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic literature review
title_full Quantitative radiologic criteria for the diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic literature review
title_fullStr Quantitative radiologic criteria for the diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic literature review
title_full_unstemmed Quantitative radiologic criteria for the diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic literature review
title_short Quantitative radiologic criteria for the diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic literature review
title_sort quantitative radiologic criteria for the diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic literature review
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3161920/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21798008
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-12-175
work_keys_str_mv AT steurerjohann quantitativeradiologiccriteriaforthediagnosisoflumbarspinalstenosisasystematicliteraturereview
AT ronersimon quantitativeradiologiccriteriaforthediagnosisoflumbarspinalstenosisasystematicliteraturereview
AT gnanntralph quantitativeradiologiccriteriaforthediagnosisoflumbarspinalstenosisasystematicliteraturereview
AT hodlerjuerg quantitativeradiologiccriteriaforthediagnosisoflumbarspinalstenosisasystematicliteraturereview