Cargando…
Quantitative radiologic criteria for the diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic literature review
BACKGROUND: Beside symptoms and clinical signs radiological findings are crucial in the diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). We investigate which quantitative radiological signs are described in the literature and which radilogical criteria are used to establish inclusion criteria in clincical...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3161920/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21798008 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-12-175 |
_version_ | 1782210757488803840 |
---|---|
author | Steurer, Johann Roner, Simon Gnannt, Ralph Hodler, Juerg |
author_facet | Steurer, Johann Roner, Simon Gnannt, Ralph Hodler, Juerg |
author_sort | Steurer, Johann |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Beside symptoms and clinical signs radiological findings are crucial in the diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). We investigate which quantitative radiological signs are described in the literature and which radilogical criteria are used to establish inclusion criteria in clincical studies evaluating different treatments in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. METHODS: A literature search was performed in Medline, Embase and the Cochrane library to identify papers reporting on radiological criteria to describe LSS and systematic reviews investigating the effects of different treatment modalities. RESULTS: 25 studies reporting on radiological signs of LSS and four systematic reviews related to the evaluation of different treatments were found. Ten different parameters were identified to quantify lumbar spinal stenosis. Most often reported measures for central stenosis were antero-posterior diameter (< 10 mm) and cross-sectional area (< 70 mm(2)) of spinal canal. For lateral stenosis height and depth of the lateral recess, and for foraminal stenosis the foraminal diameter were typically used. Only four of 63 primary studies included in the systematic reviews reported on quantitative measures for defining inclusion criteria of patients in prognostic studies. CONCLUSIONS: There is a need for consensus on well-defined, unambiguous radiological criteria to define lumbar spinal stenosis in order to improve diagnostic accuracy and to formulate reliable inclusion criteria for clinical studies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3161920 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-31619202011-08-26 Quantitative radiologic criteria for the diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic literature review Steurer, Johann Roner, Simon Gnannt, Ralph Hodler, Juerg BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: Beside symptoms and clinical signs radiological findings are crucial in the diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). We investigate which quantitative radiological signs are described in the literature and which radilogical criteria are used to establish inclusion criteria in clincical studies evaluating different treatments in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. METHODS: A literature search was performed in Medline, Embase and the Cochrane library to identify papers reporting on radiological criteria to describe LSS and systematic reviews investigating the effects of different treatment modalities. RESULTS: 25 studies reporting on radiological signs of LSS and four systematic reviews related to the evaluation of different treatments were found. Ten different parameters were identified to quantify lumbar spinal stenosis. Most often reported measures for central stenosis were antero-posterior diameter (< 10 mm) and cross-sectional area (< 70 mm(2)) of spinal canal. For lateral stenosis height and depth of the lateral recess, and for foraminal stenosis the foraminal diameter were typically used. Only four of 63 primary studies included in the systematic reviews reported on quantitative measures for defining inclusion criteria of patients in prognostic studies. CONCLUSIONS: There is a need for consensus on well-defined, unambiguous radiological criteria to define lumbar spinal stenosis in order to improve diagnostic accuracy and to formulate reliable inclusion criteria for clinical studies. BioMed Central 2011-07-28 /pmc/articles/PMC3161920/ /pubmed/21798008 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-12-175 Text en Copyright ©2011 Steurer et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Steurer, Johann Roner, Simon Gnannt, Ralph Hodler, Juerg Quantitative radiologic criteria for the diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic literature review |
title | Quantitative radiologic criteria for the diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic literature review |
title_full | Quantitative radiologic criteria for the diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic literature review |
title_fullStr | Quantitative radiologic criteria for the diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic literature review |
title_full_unstemmed | Quantitative radiologic criteria for the diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic literature review |
title_short | Quantitative radiologic criteria for the diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic literature review |
title_sort | quantitative radiologic criteria for the diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic literature review |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3161920/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21798008 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-12-175 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT steurerjohann quantitativeradiologiccriteriaforthediagnosisoflumbarspinalstenosisasystematicliteraturereview AT ronersimon quantitativeradiologiccriteriaforthediagnosisoflumbarspinalstenosisasystematicliteraturereview AT gnanntralph quantitativeradiologiccriteriaforthediagnosisoflumbarspinalstenosisasystematicliteraturereview AT hodlerjuerg quantitativeradiologiccriteriaforthediagnosisoflumbarspinalstenosisasystematicliteraturereview |