Cargando…
Variables Affecting the Gingival Embrasure Space in Aesthetically Important Regions: Differences between Central and Lateral Papillae
This study evaluated different variables to determine their role in the appearance of the central and lateral upper jaw papillae. 292 interdental embrasures were examined. Personal variables were: age, smoke, and use of interproximal hygiene devices. The clinical characteristics were: tooth shape, p...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Bentham Open
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3162192/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21892365 http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874210601105010126 |
_version_ | 1782210791437500416 |
---|---|
author | Montevecchi, Marco Checchi, Vittorio Piana, Laura Checchi, Luigi |
author_facet | Montevecchi, Marco Checchi, Vittorio Piana, Laura Checchi, Luigi |
author_sort | Montevecchi, Marco |
collection | PubMed |
description | This study evaluated different variables to determine their role in the appearance of the central and lateral upper jaw papillae. 292 interdental embrasures were examined. Personal variables were: age, smoke, and use of interproximal hygiene devices. The clinical characteristics were: tooth shape, periodontal biotype and papilla appearance. Radiographic measurements were: root to root distance at the cemento-enamel junction (horizontal distance), and bone crest to interdental contact point distance (vertical distance). The papilla recession increased with patient age. The horizontal distance of the central papilla was always greater (up to 1 mm) than that of the other papillae. The vertical distance of the central papilla was greater (up to 2 mm) than that of the other papillae for each class except for the normal one (Nordland & Tarnow classification). For vertical distances ≤5 mm, papillae were almost always present; for distances up to 6 mm, the lateral papillae belonging to the normal class disappeared, while the central papilla remained in 11% of cases; central papillae of class 1 were present in larger proportions until a vertical distance of 8 mm. The present observational study shows that differences on clinical and radiographic determinants do exist between central and lateral papillae. This variance should be strictly taken in account for a harmonious and stable treatment outcome on this highly aesthetic area. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3162192 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | Bentham Open |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-31621922011-09-02 Variables Affecting the Gingival Embrasure Space in Aesthetically Important Regions: Differences between Central and Lateral Papillae Montevecchi, Marco Checchi, Vittorio Piana, Laura Checchi, Luigi Open Dent J Article This study evaluated different variables to determine their role in the appearance of the central and lateral upper jaw papillae. 292 interdental embrasures were examined. Personal variables were: age, smoke, and use of interproximal hygiene devices. The clinical characteristics were: tooth shape, periodontal biotype and papilla appearance. Radiographic measurements were: root to root distance at the cemento-enamel junction (horizontal distance), and bone crest to interdental contact point distance (vertical distance). The papilla recession increased with patient age. The horizontal distance of the central papilla was always greater (up to 1 mm) than that of the other papillae. The vertical distance of the central papilla was greater (up to 2 mm) than that of the other papillae for each class except for the normal one (Nordland & Tarnow classification). For vertical distances ≤5 mm, papillae were almost always present; for distances up to 6 mm, the lateral papillae belonging to the normal class disappeared, while the central papilla remained in 11% of cases; central papillae of class 1 were present in larger proportions until a vertical distance of 8 mm. The present observational study shows that differences on clinical and radiographic determinants do exist between central and lateral papillae. This variance should be strictly taken in account for a harmonious and stable treatment outcome on this highly aesthetic area. Bentham Open 2011-07-29 /pmc/articles/PMC3162192/ /pubmed/21892365 http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874210601105010126 Text en © Montevecchi et al.; Licensee Bentham Open. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an open access article licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted, non-commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Article Montevecchi, Marco Checchi, Vittorio Piana, Laura Checchi, Luigi Variables Affecting the Gingival Embrasure Space in Aesthetically Important Regions: Differences between Central and Lateral Papillae |
title | Variables Affecting the Gingival Embrasure Space in Aesthetically Important Regions: Differences between Central and Lateral Papillae |
title_full | Variables Affecting the Gingival Embrasure Space in Aesthetically Important Regions: Differences between Central and Lateral Papillae |
title_fullStr | Variables Affecting the Gingival Embrasure Space in Aesthetically Important Regions: Differences between Central and Lateral Papillae |
title_full_unstemmed | Variables Affecting the Gingival Embrasure Space in Aesthetically Important Regions: Differences between Central and Lateral Papillae |
title_short | Variables Affecting the Gingival Embrasure Space in Aesthetically Important Regions: Differences between Central and Lateral Papillae |
title_sort | variables affecting the gingival embrasure space in aesthetically important regions: differences between central and lateral papillae |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3162192/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21892365 http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874210601105010126 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT montevecchimarco variablesaffectingthegingivalembrasurespaceinaestheticallyimportantregionsdifferencesbetweencentralandlateralpapillae AT checchivittorio variablesaffectingthegingivalembrasurespaceinaestheticallyimportantregionsdifferencesbetweencentralandlateralpapillae AT pianalaura variablesaffectingthegingivalembrasurespaceinaestheticallyimportantregionsdifferencesbetweencentralandlateralpapillae AT checchiluigi variablesaffectingthegingivalembrasurespaceinaestheticallyimportantregionsdifferencesbetweencentralandlateralpapillae |