Cargando…
Application of an efficient Bayesian discretization method to biomedical data
BACKGROUND: Several data mining methods require data that are discrete, and other methods often perform better with discrete data. We introduce an efficient Bayesian discretization (EBD) method for optimal discretization of variables that runs efficiently on high-dimensional biomedical datasets. The...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3162539/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21798039 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-12-309 |
_version_ | 1782210824690991104 |
---|---|
author | Lustgarten, Jonathan L Visweswaran, Shyam Gopalakrishnan, Vanathi Cooper, Gregory F |
author_facet | Lustgarten, Jonathan L Visweswaran, Shyam Gopalakrishnan, Vanathi Cooper, Gregory F |
author_sort | Lustgarten, Jonathan L |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Several data mining methods require data that are discrete, and other methods often perform better with discrete data. We introduce an efficient Bayesian discretization (EBD) method for optimal discretization of variables that runs efficiently on high-dimensional biomedical datasets. The EBD method consists of two components, namely, a Bayesian score to evaluate discretizations and a dynamic programming search procedure to efficiently search the space of possible discretizations. We compared the performance of EBD to Fayyad and Irani's (FI) discretization method, which is commonly used for discretization. RESULTS: On 24 biomedical datasets obtained from high-throughput transcriptomic and proteomic studies, the classification performances of the C4.5 classifier and the naïve Bayes classifier were statistically significantly better when the predictor variables were discretized using EBD over FI. EBD was statistically significantly more stable to the variability of the datasets than FI. However, EBD was less robust, though not statistically significantly so, than FI and produced slightly more complex discretizations than FI. CONCLUSIONS: On a range of biomedical datasets, a Bayesian discretization method (EBD) yielded better classification performance and stability but was less robust than the widely used FI discretization method. The EBD discretization method is easy to implement, permits the incorporation of prior knowledge and belief, and is sufficiently fast for application to high-dimensional data. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3162539 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-31625392011-08-27 Application of an efficient Bayesian discretization method to biomedical data Lustgarten, Jonathan L Visweswaran, Shyam Gopalakrishnan, Vanathi Cooper, Gregory F BMC Bioinformatics Research Article BACKGROUND: Several data mining methods require data that are discrete, and other methods often perform better with discrete data. We introduce an efficient Bayesian discretization (EBD) method for optimal discretization of variables that runs efficiently on high-dimensional biomedical datasets. The EBD method consists of two components, namely, a Bayesian score to evaluate discretizations and a dynamic programming search procedure to efficiently search the space of possible discretizations. We compared the performance of EBD to Fayyad and Irani's (FI) discretization method, which is commonly used for discretization. RESULTS: On 24 biomedical datasets obtained from high-throughput transcriptomic and proteomic studies, the classification performances of the C4.5 classifier and the naïve Bayes classifier were statistically significantly better when the predictor variables were discretized using EBD over FI. EBD was statistically significantly more stable to the variability of the datasets than FI. However, EBD was less robust, though not statistically significantly so, than FI and produced slightly more complex discretizations than FI. CONCLUSIONS: On a range of biomedical datasets, a Bayesian discretization method (EBD) yielded better classification performance and stability but was less robust than the widely used FI discretization method. The EBD discretization method is easy to implement, permits the incorporation of prior knowledge and belief, and is sufficiently fast for application to high-dimensional data. BioMed Central 2011-07-28 /pmc/articles/PMC3162539/ /pubmed/21798039 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-12-309 Text en Copyright ©2011 Lustgarten et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Lustgarten, Jonathan L Visweswaran, Shyam Gopalakrishnan, Vanathi Cooper, Gregory F Application of an efficient Bayesian discretization method to biomedical data |
title | Application of an efficient Bayesian discretization method to biomedical data |
title_full | Application of an efficient Bayesian discretization method to biomedical data |
title_fullStr | Application of an efficient Bayesian discretization method to biomedical data |
title_full_unstemmed | Application of an efficient Bayesian discretization method to biomedical data |
title_short | Application of an efficient Bayesian discretization method to biomedical data |
title_sort | application of an efficient bayesian discretization method to biomedical data |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3162539/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21798039 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-12-309 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lustgartenjonathanl applicationofanefficientbayesiandiscretizationmethodtobiomedicaldata AT visweswaranshyam applicationofanefficientbayesiandiscretizationmethodtobiomedicaldata AT gopalakrishnanvanathi applicationofanefficientbayesiandiscretizationmethodtobiomedicaldata AT coopergregoryf applicationofanefficientbayesiandiscretizationmethodtobiomedicaldata |