Cargando…

Tight blood glucose control in trauma patients: Who really benefits?

BACKGROUND: This study was designed to evaluate the effect of intensive insulin control (IIT) on outcomes for traumatically injured patients as a function of injury severity score (ISS) and age. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of 2028 adult trauma patients admitted to the surgical inten...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Eriksson, Evert A, Christianson, David A, Vanderkolk, Wayne E, Bonnell, Bruce W, Hoogeboom, James E, Ott, Mickey M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3162705/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21887026
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-2700.83864
_version_ 1782210851683434496
author Eriksson, Evert A
Christianson, David A
Vanderkolk, Wayne E
Bonnell, Bruce W
Hoogeboom, James E
Ott, Mickey M
author_facet Eriksson, Evert A
Christianson, David A
Vanderkolk, Wayne E
Bonnell, Bruce W
Hoogeboom, James E
Ott, Mickey M
author_sort Eriksson, Evert A
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This study was designed to evaluate the effect of intensive insulin control (IIT) on outcomes for traumatically injured patients as a function of injury severity score (ISS) and age. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of 2028 adult trauma patients admitted to the surgical intensive care unit (SICU) in a Level I trauma center was performed. Data were collected from a 48-month period before (Pre-IIT) (goal blood glucose 80–200 mg/dL) and after (Post-IIT) (goal blood glucose level 80–110 mg/dL), an IIT protocol was initiated. Patients were stratified by age and ISS. The primary endpoint was mortality. RESULTS: There were 784 Pre-IIT and 1244 Post-IIT patients admitted. There was no significant difference between Pre-IIT vs. Post-IIT for the mechanism of injury or ISS. Values for the Pre-IIT group were significantly higher for mortality (21.5% vs. 14.7%, P<0.001) and hospital, but not ICU length of stay were decreased. A significant improvement in mortality was demonstrated between Pre-IIT vs. Post-IIT stratified within the age groups of 41–50, 51–60, and 61 but not the groups 18–30 and 31–40. Mean glucose levels (mg/dL) decreased significantly after the institution of IIT (144.7±1.4 vs. 130.9±0.9; P<0.001). In addition, the occurrence per patient of blood glucose levels <40 mg/dL increased (0.77% vs. 2.86%; P=0.001) and blood glucose levels greater than 200 mg/dL was similar (39.1% vs. 38.8%; P=0.892) in the Pre-IIT and Post-IIT groups, respectively. Glycemic variability, reflected by the standard deviation of each patient's mean glucose level during ICU stay, as well as mean glucose level were lower in survivors than in nonsurvivors. Finally, multivariable logistic regression analysis identified both mean glucose level and glycemic variability as independent contributors to the risk of mortality. CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of IIT has been associated with a decrease in both hospital length of stay as well as mortality. Average glucose value and glucose variability are independent predictors of survival. Trauma patients with moderate, severe, and very severe injuries benefit most from IIT. These observational data suggest that patients over 40 years of age benefited a great deal more than their younger counterparts from IIT. This study supports the need for a randomized controlled trial to investigate the role of IIT in traumatically injured patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3162705
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Medknow Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31627052011-09-01 Tight blood glucose control in trauma patients: Who really benefits? Eriksson, Evert A Christianson, David A Vanderkolk, Wayne E Bonnell, Bruce W Hoogeboom, James E Ott, Mickey M J Emerg Trauma Shock Original Article BACKGROUND: This study was designed to evaluate the effect of intensive insulin control (IIT) on outcomes for traumatically injured patients as a function of injury severity score (ISS) and age. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of 2028 adult trauma patients admitted to the surgical intensive care unit (SICU) in a Level I trauma center was performed. Data were collected from a 48-month period before (Pre-IIT) (goal blood glucose 80–200 mg/dL) and after (Post-IIT) (goal blood glucose level 80–110 mg/dL), an IIT protocol was initiated. Patients were stratified by age and ISS. The primary endpoint was mortality. RESULTS: There were 784 Pre-IIT and 1244 Post-IIT patients admitted. There was no significant difference between Pre-IIT vs. Post-IIT for the mechanism of injury or ISS. Values for the Pre-IIT group were significantly higher for mortality (21.5% vs. 14.7%, P<0.001) and hospital, but not ICU length of stay were decreased. A significant improvement in mortality was demonstrated between Pre-IIT vs. Post-IIT stratified within the age groups of 41–50, 51–60, and 61 but not the groups 18–30 and 31–40. Mean glucose levels (mg/dL) decreased significantly after the institution of IIT (144.7±1.4 vs. 130.9±0.9; P<0.001). In addition, the occurrence per patient of blood glucose levels <40 mg/dL increased (0.77% vs. 2.86%; P=0.001) and blood glucose levels greater than 200 mg/dL was similar (39.1% vs. 38.8%; P=0.892) in the Pre-IIT and Post-IIT groups, respectively. Glycemic variability, reflected by the standard deviation of each patient's mean glucose level during ICU stay, as well as mean glucose level were lower in survivors than in nonsurvivors. Finally, multivariable logistic regression analysis identified both mean glucose level and glycemic variability as independent contributors to the risk of mortality. CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of IIT has been associated with a decrease in both hospital length of stay as well as mortality. Average glucose value and glucose variability are independent predictors of survival. Trauma patients with moderate, severe, and very severe injuries benefit most from IIT. These observational data suggest that patients over 40 years of age benefited a great deal more than their younger counterparts from IIT. This study supports the need for a randomized controlled trial to investigate the role of IIT in traumatically injured patients. Medknow Publications 2011 /pmc/articles/PMC3162705/ /pubmed/21887026 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-2700.83864 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Emergencies, Trauma, and Shock http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Eriksson, Evert A
Christianson, David A
Vanderkolk, Wayne E
Bonnell, Bruce W
Hoogeboom, James E
Ott, Mickey M
Tight blood glucose control in trauma patients: Who really benefits?
title Tight blood glucose control in trauma patients: Who really benefits?
title_full Tight blood glucose control in trauma patients: Who really benefits?
title_fullStr Tight blood glucose control in trauma patients: Who really benefits?
title_full_unstemmed Tight blood glucose control in trauma patients: Who really benefits?
title_short Tight blood glucose control in trauma patients: Who really benefits?
title_sort tight blood glucose control in trauma patients: who really benefits?
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3162705/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21887026
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-2700.83864
work_keys_str_mv AT erikssoneverta tightbloodglucosecontrolintraumapatientswhoreallybenefits
AT christiansondavida tightbloodglucosecontrolintraumapatientswhoreallybenefits
AT vanderkolkwaynee tightbloodglucosecontrolintraumapatientswhoreallybenefits
AT bonnellbrucew tightbloodglucosecontrolintraumapatientswhoreallybenefits
AT hoogeboomjamese tightbloodglucosecontrolintraumapatientswhoreallybenefits
AT ottmickeym tightbloodglucosecontrolintraumapatientswhoreallybenefits