Cargando…

Indicators of potential for rupture for ectopics seen in the emergency department

BACKGROUND: Emergency departments (ED) frequently evaluate patients with probable ectopic pregnancies who go home and may rupture. It would be beneficial to know which patient factors are associated with rupture and which are not. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to determine which ED patie...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Downey, La Vonne A, Zun, Leslie S
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3162708/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21887029
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-2700.83867
_version_ 1782210852348231680
author Downey, La Vonne A
Zun, Leslie S
author_facet Downey, La Vonne A
Zun, Leslie S
author_sort Downey, La Vonne A
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Emergency departments (ED) frequently evaluate patients with probable ectopic pregnancies who go home and may rupture. It would be beneficial to know which patient factors are associated with rupture and which are not. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to determine which ED patients with ectopic pregnancies are at risk for rupture. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was a retrospective chart review of all women aged ≥18 years during a 5-year period who were diagnosed with ectopic pregnancy to a level I ED. Data collected included basic demographic information, medical, surgical, obstetric and gynecologic history, social and sexual history, findings on physical examination, and laboratory values such as urine pregnancy test, β-hCG, and complete blood count. RESULTS: There was a significant difference using a multivariate regression analysis with 95% CI in history findings of abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, and urinary tract symptoms. There was a significant difference in physical examination of pulse, diastolic pressure, abdominal tenderness, peritoneal signs, cervical motion tenderness, and adnexal tenderness. There was also a significant difference in β-hCG, hemoglobin and hematocrit results and ultrasound findings of free peritoneal fluid, intrauterine pregnancy and cardiac findings between those who ruptured and those who did not. None of these tests was able to differentiate those that would go on to rupture. CONCLUSION: The result of the study did not find any single sign, symptom, or test that could reliably differentiate patients who have a ruptured ectopic from those who do not. However, β-hCG over 1500 mIU was the best variable in explaining the variation between those who would or would not go on to rupture after their ED visit.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3162708
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Medknow Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31627082011-09-01 Indicators of potential for rupture for ectopics seen in the emergency department Downey, La Vonne A Zun, Leslie S J Emerg Trauma Shock Original Article BACKGROUND: Emergency departments (ED) frequently evaluate patients with probable ectopic pregnancies who go home and may rupture. It would be beneficial to know which patient factors are associated with rupture and which are not. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to determine which ED patients with ectopic pregnancies are at risk for rupture. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was a retrospective chart review of all women aged ≥18 years during a 5-year period who were diagnosed with ectopic pregnancy to a level I ED. Data collected included basic demographic information, medical, surgical, obstetric and gynecologic history, social and sexual history, findings on physical examination, and laboratory values such as urine pregnancy test, β-hCG, and complete blood count. RESULTS: There was a significant difference using a multivariate regression analysis with 95% CI in history findings of abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, and urinary tract symptoms. There was a significant difference in physical examination of pulse, diastolic pressure, abdominal tenderness, peritoneal signs, cervical motion tenderness, and adnexal tenderness. There was also a significant difference in β-hCG, hemoglobin and hematocrit results and ultrasound findings of free peritoneal fluid, intrauterine pregnancy and cardiac findings between those who ruptured and those who did not. None of these tests was able to differentiate those that would go on to rupture. CONCLUSION: The result of the study did not find any single sign, symptom, or test that could reliably differentiate patients who have a ruptured ectopic from those who do not. However, β-hCG over 1500 mIU was the best variable in explaining the variation between those who would or would not go on to rupture after their ED visit. Medknow Publications 2011 /pmc/articles/PMC3162708/ /pubmed/21887029 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-2700.83867 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Emergencies, Trauma, and Shock http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Downey, La Vonne A
Zun, Leslie S
Indicators of potential for rupture for ectopics seen in the emergency department
title Indicators of potential for rupture for ectopics seen in the emergency department
title_full Indicators of potential for rupture for ectopics seen in the emergency department
title_fullStr Indicators of potential for rupture for ectopics seen in the emergency department
title_full_unstemmed Indicators of potential for rupture for ectopics seen in the emergency department
title_short Indicators of potential for rupture for ectopics seen in the emergency department
title_sort indicators of potential for rupture for ectopics seen in the emergency department
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3162708/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21887029
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-2700.83867
work_keys_str_mv AT downeylavonnea indicatorsofpotentialforruptureforectopicsseenintheemergencydepartment
AT zunleslies indicatorsofpotentialforruptureforectopicsseenintheemergencydepartment