Cargando…
Review of the current state of whole slide imaging in pathology
Whole slide imaging (WSI), or “virtual” microscopy, involves the scanning (digitization) of glass slides to produce “digital slides”. WSI has been advocated for diagnostic, educational and research purposes. When used for remote frozen section diagnosis, WSI requires a thorough implementation period...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications Pvt Ltd
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3162745/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21886892 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2153-3539.83746 |
_version_ | 1782210860769345536 |
---|---|
author | Pantanowitz, Liron Valenstein, Paul N. Evans, Andrew J. Kaplan, Keith J. Pfeifer, John D. Wilbur, David C. Collins, Laura C. Colgan, Terence J. |
author_facet | Pantanowitz, Liron Valenstein, Paul N. Evans, Andrew J. Kaplan, Keith J. Pfeifer, John D. Wilbur, David C. Collins, Laura C. Colgan, Terence J. |
author_sort | Pantanowitz, Liron |
collection | PubMed |
description | Whole slide imaging (WSI), or “virtual” microscopy, involves the scanning (digitization) of glass slides to produce “digital slides”. WSI has been advocated for diagnostic, educational and research purposes. When used for remote frozen section diagnosis, WSI requires a thorough implementation period coupled with trained support personnel. Adoption of WSI for rendering pathologic diagnoses on a routine basis has been shown to be successful in only a few “niche” applications. Wider adoption will most likely require full integration with the laboratory information system, continuous automated scanning, high-bandwidth connectivity, massive storage capacity, and more intuitive user interfaces. Nevertheless, WSI has been reported to enhance specific pathology practices, such as scanning slides received in consultation or of legal cases, of slides to be used for patient care conferences, for quality assurance purposes, to retain records of slides to be sent out or destroyed by ancillary testing, and for performing digital image analysis. In addition to technical issues, regulatory and validation requirements related to WSI have yet to be adequately addressed. Although limited validation studies have been published using WSI there are currently no standard guidelines for validating WSI for diagnostic use in the clinical laboratory. This review addresses the current status of WSI in pathology related to regulation and validation, the provision of remote and routine pathologic diagnoses, educational uses, implementation issues, and the cost-benefit analysis of adopting WSI in routine clinical practice. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3162745 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | Medknow Publications Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-31627452011-08-31 Review of the current state of whole slide imaging in pathology Pantanowitz, Liron Valenstein, Paul N. Evans, Andrew J. Kaplan, Keith J. Pfeifer, John D. Wilbur, David C. Collins, Laura C. Colgan, Terence J. J Pathol Inform Review Article Whole slide imaging (WSI), or “virtual” microscopy, involves the scanning (digitization) of glass slides to produce “digital slides”. WSI has been advocated for diagnostic, educational and research purposes. When used for remote frozen section diagnosis, WSI requires a thorough implementation period coupled with trained support personnel. Adoption of WSI for rendering pathologic diagnoses on a routine basis has been shown to be successful in only a few “niche” applications. Wider adoption will most likely require full integration with the laboratory information system, continuous automated scanning, high-bandwidth connectivity, massive storage capacity, and more intuitive user interfaces. Nevertheless, WSI has been reported to enhance specific pathology practices, such as scanning slides received in consultation or of legal cases, of slides to be used for patient care conferences, for quality assurance purposes, to retain records of slides to be sent out or destroyed by ancillary testing, and for performing digital image analysis. In addition to technical issues, regulatory and validation requirements related to WSI have yet to be adequately addressed. Although limited validation studies have been published using WSI there are currently no standard guidelines for validating WSI for diagnostic use in the clinical laboratory. This review addresses the current status of WSI in pathology related to regulation and validation, the provision of remote and routine pathologic diagnoses, educational uses, implementation issues, and the cost-benefit analysis of adopting WSI in routine clinical practice. Medknow Publications Pvt Ltd 2011-08-13 /pmc/articles/PMC3162745/ /pubmed/21886892 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2153-3539.83746 Text en Copyright: © 2011 Pantanowitz L. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Pantanowitz, Liron Valenstein, Paul N. Evans, Andrew J. Kaplan, Keith J. Pfeifer, John D. Wilbur, David C. Collins, Laura C. Colgan, Terence J. Review of the current state of whole slide imaging in pathology |
title | Review of the current state of whole slide imaging in pathology |
title_full | Review of the current state of whole slide imaging in pathology |
title_fullStr | Review of the current state of whole slide imaging in pathology |
title_full_unstemmed | Review of the current state of whole slide imaging in pathology |
title_short | Review of the current state of whole slide imaging in pathology |
title_sort | review of the current state of whole slide imaging in pathology |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3162745/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21886892 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2153-3539.83746 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pantanowitzliron reviewofthecurrentstateofwholeslideimaginginpathology AT valensteinpauln reviewofthecurrentstateofwholeslideimaginginpathology AT evansandrewj reviewofthecurrentstateofwholeslideimaginginpathology AT kaplankeithj reviewofthecurrentstateofwholeslideimaginginpathology AT pfeiferjohnd reviewofthecurrentstateofwholeslideimaginginpathology AT wilburdavidc reviewofthecurrentstateofwholeslideimaginginpathology AT collinslaurac reviewofthecurrentstateofwholeslideimaginginpathology AT colganterencej reviewofthecurrentstateofwholeslideimaginginpathology |