Cargando…

Family planning in conflict: results of cross-sectional baseline surveys in three African countries

BACKGROUND: Despite the serious consequences of conflict for reproductive health, populations affected by conflict and its aftermath face tremendous barriers to accessing reproductive health services, due to insecurity, inadequate numbers of trained personnel and lack of supplies. Family planning is...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McGinn, Therese, Austin, Judy, Anfinson, Katherine, Amsalu, Ribka, Casey, Sara E, Fadulalmula, Shihab Ibrahim, Langston, Anne, Lee-Jones, Louise, Meyers, Janet, Mubiru, Frederick Kintu, Schlecht, Jennifer, Sharer, Melissa, Yetter, Mary
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3162885/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21752241
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1752-1505-5-11
_version_ 1782210892124913664
author McGinn, Therese
Austin, Judy
Anfinson, Katherine
Amsalu, Ribka
Casey, Sara E
Fadulalmula, Shihab Ibrahim
Langston, Anne
Lee-Jones, Louise
Meyers, Janet
Mubiru, Frederick Kintu
Schlecht, Jennifer
Sharer, Melissa
Yetter, Mary
author_facet McGinn, Therese
Austin, Judy
Anfinson, Katherine
Amsalu, Ribka
Casey, Sara E
Fadulalmula, Shihab Ibrahim
Langston, Anne
Lee-Jones, Louise
Meyers, Janet
Mubiru, Frederick Kintu
Schlecht, Jennifer
Sharer, Melissa
Yetter, Mary
author_sort McGinn, Therese
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Despite the serious consequences of conflict for reproductive health, populations affected by conflict and its aftermath face tremendous barriers to accessing reproductive health services, due to insecurity, inadequate numbers of trained personnel and lack of supplies. Family planning is often particularly neglected. METHODS: In six conflict-affected areas in Sudan, northern Uganda and the Democratic Republic of Congo, household surveys of married or in-union women of reproductive age were conducted to determine baseline measures of family planning knowledge, attitudes and behaviors regarding contraception. Health facility assessments were carried out to assess baseline measures of family planning services availability. Data were double-entered into CSPro 3.2 and exported to SAS 9.2, which was used to calculate descriptive statistics. The studies' purposes were to guide program activities and to serve as a baseline against which program accomplishments could be measured. RESULTS: Knowledge of modern contraceptive methods was low relative to other sub-Saharan African countries, and use of modern methods was under 4% in four sites; in two sites with prior family planning services it was 12% and 16.2%. From 30% to 40% of women reported they did not want a child within two years, however, and an additional 12% to 35% wanted no additional children, suggesting a clear need for family planning services. The health facilities assessment showed that at most only one-third of the facilities mandated to provide family planning had the necessary staff, equipment and supplies to do so adequately; in some areas, none of the facilities were prepared to offer such services. CONCLUSIONS: Family planning services are desired by women living in crisis situations when offered in a manner appropriate to their needs, yet services are rarely adequate to meet these needs. Refugee and internally displaced women must be included in national and donors' plans to improve family planning in Africa.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3162885
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31628852011-08-28 Family planning in conflict: results of cross-sectional baseline surveys in three African countries McGinn, Therese Austin, Judy Anfinson, Katherine Amsalu, Ribka Casey, Sara E Fadulalmula, Shihab Ibrahim Langston, Anne Lee-Jones, Louise Meyers, Janet Mubiru, Frederick Kintu Schlecht, Jennifer Sharer, Melissa Yetter, Mary Confl Health Research BACKGROUND: Despite the serious consequences of conflict for reproductive health, populations affected by conflict and its aftermath face tremendous barriers to accessing reproductive health services, due to insecurity, inadequate numbers of trained personnel and lack of supplies. Family planning is often particularly neglected. METHODS: In six conflict-affected areas in Sudan, northern Uganda and the Democratic Republic of Congo, household surveys of married or in-union women of reproductive age were conducted to determine baseline measures of family planning knowledge, attitudes and behaviors regarding contraception. Health facility assessments were carried out to assess baseline measures of family planning services availability. Data were double-entered into CSPro 3.2 and exported to SAS 9.2, which was used to calculate descriptive statistics. The studies' purposes were to guide program activities and to serve as a baseline against which program accomplishments could be measured. RESULTS: Knowledge of modern contraceptive methods was low relative to other sub-Saharan African countries, and use of modern methods was under 4% in four sites; in two sites with prior family planning services it was 12% and 16.2%. From 30% to 40% of women reported they did not want a child within two years, however, and an additional 12% to 35% wanted no additional children, suggesting a clear need for family planning services. The health facilities assessment showed that at most only one-third of the facilities mandated to provide family planning had the necessary staff, equipment and supplies to do so adequately; in some areas, none of the facilities were prepared to offer such services. CONCLUSIONS: Family planning services are desired by women living in crisis situations when offered in a manner appropriate to their needs, yet services are rarely adequate to meet these needs. Refugee and internally displaced women must be included in national and donors' plans to improve family planning in Africa. BioMed Central 2011-07-13 /pmc/articles/PMC3162885/ /pubmed/21752241 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1752-1505-5-11 Text en Copyright ©2011 McGinn et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
McGinn, Therese
Austin, Judy
Anfinson, Katherine
Amsalu, Ribka
Casey, Sara E
Fadulalmula, Shihab Ibrahim
Langston, Anne
Lee-Jones, Louise
Meyers, Janet
Mubiru, Frederick Kintu
Schlecht, Jennifer
Sharer, Melissa
Yetter, Mary
Family planning in conflict: results of cross-sectional baseline surveys in three African countries
title Family planning in conflict: results of cross-sectional baseline surveys in three African countries
title_full Family planning in conflict: results of cross-sectional baseline surveys in three African countries
title_fullStr Family planning in conflict: results of cross-sectional baseline surveys in three African countries
title_full_unstemmed Family planning in conflict: results of cross-sectional baseline surveys in three African countries
title_short Family planning in conflict: results of cross-sectional baseline surveys in three African countries
title_sort family planning in conflict: results of cross-sectional baseline surveys in three african countries
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3162885/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21752241
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1752-1505-5-11
work_keys_str_mv AT mcginntherese familyplanninginconflictresultsofcrosssectionalbaselinesurveysinthreeafricancountries
AT austinjudy familyplanninginconflictresultsofcrosssectionalbaselinesurveysinthreeafricancountries
AT anfinsonkatherine familyplanninginconflictresultsofcrosssectionalbaselinesurveysinthreeafricancountries
AT amsaluribka familyplanninginconflictresultsofcrosssectionalbaselinesurveysinthreeafricancountries
AT caseysarae familyplanninginconflictresultsofcrosssectionalbaselinesurveysinthreeafricancountries
AT fadulalmulashihabibrahim familyplanninginconflictresultsofcrosssectionalbaselinesurveysinthreeafricancountries
AT langstonanne familyplanninginconflictresultsofcrosssectionalbaselinesurveysinthreeafricancountries
AT leejoneslouise familyplanninginconflictresultsofcrosssectionalbaselinesurveysinthreeafricancountries
AT meyersjanet familyplanninginconflictresultsofcrosssectionalbaselinesurveysinthreeafricancountries
AT mubirufrederickkintu familyplanninginconflictresultsofcrosssectionalbaselinesurveysinthreeafricancountries
AT schlechtjennifer familyplanninginconflictresultsofcrosssectionalbaselinesurveysinthreeafricancountries
AT sharermelissa familyplanninginconflictresultsofcrosssectionalbaselinesurveysinthreeafricancountries
AT yettermary familyplanninginconflictresultsofcrosssectionalbaselinesurveysinthreeafricancountries