Cargando…
Nanoparticle exposure at nanotechnology workplaces: A review
Risk, associated with nanomaterial use, is determined by exposure and hazard potential of these materials. Both topics cannot be evaluated absolutely independently. Realistic dose concentrations should be tested based on stringent exposure assessments for the corresponding nanomaterial taking into a...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3162892/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21794132 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-8977-8-22 |
_version_ | 1782210893701971968 |
---|---|
author | Kuhlbusch, Thomas AJ Asbach, Christof Fissan, Heinz Göhler, Daniel Stintz, Michael |
author_facet | Kuhlbusch, Thomas AJ Asbach, Christof Fissan, Heinz Göhler, Daniel Stintz, Michael |
author_sort | Kuhlbusch, Thomas AJ |
collection | PubMed |
description | Risk, associated with nanomaterial use, is determined by exposure and hazard potential of these materials. Both topics cannot be evaluated absolutely independently. Realistic dose concentrations should be tested based on stringent exposure assessments for the corresponding nanomaterial taking into account also the environmental and product matrix. This review focuses on current available information from peer reviewed publications related to airborne nanomaterial exposure. Two approaches to derive realistic exposure values are differentiated and independently presented; those based on workplace measurements and the others based on simulations in laboratories. An assessment of the current available workplace measurement data using a matrix, which is related to nanomaterials and work processes, shows, that data are available on the likelihood of release and possible exposure. Laboratory studies are seen as an important complementary source of information on particle release processes and hence for possible exposure. In both cases, whether workplace measurements or laboratories studies, the issue of background particles is a major problem. From this review, major areas for future activities and focal points are identified. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3162892 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-31628922011-08-28 Nanoparticle exposure at nanotechnology workplaces: A review Kuhlbusch, Thomas AJ Asbach, Christof Fissan, Heinz Göhler, Daniel Stintz, Michael Part Fibre Toxicol Review Risk, associated with nanomaterial use, is determined by exposure and hazard potential of these materials. Both topics cannot be evaluated absolutely independently. Realistic dose concentrations should be tested based on stringent exposure assessments for the corresponding nanomaterial taking into account also the environmental and product matrix. This review focuses on current available information from peer reviewed publications related to airborne nanomaterial exposure. Two approaches to derive realistic exposure values are differentiated and independently presented; those based on workplace measurements and the others based on simulations in laboratories. An assessment of the current available workplace measurement data using a matrix, which is related to nanomaterials and work processes, shows, that data are available on the likelihood of release and possible exposure. Laboratory studies are seen as an important complementary source of information on particle release processes and hence for possible exposure. In both cases, whether workplace measurements or laboratories studies, the issue of background particles is a major problem. From this review, major areas for future activities and focal points are identified. BioMed Central 2011-07-27 /pmc/articles/PMC3162892/ /pubmed/21794132 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-8977-8-22 Text en Copyright ©2011 Kuhlbusch et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Kuhlbusch, Thomas AJ Asbach, Christof Fissan, Heinz Göhler, Daniel Stintz, Michael Nanoparticle exposure at nanotechnology workplaces: A review |
title | Nanoparticle exposure at nanotechnology workplaces: A review |
title_full | Nanoparticle exposure at nanotechnology workplaces: A review |
title_fullStr | Nanoparticle exposure at nanotechnology workplaces: A review |
title_full_unstemmed | Nanoparticle exposure at nanotechnology workplaces: A review |
title_short | Nanoparticle exposure at nanotechnology workplaces: A review |
title_sort | nanoparticle exposure at nanotechnology workplaces: a review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3162892/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21794132 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-8977-8-22 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kuhlbuschthomasaj nanoparticleexposureatnanotechnologyworkplacesareview AT asbachchristof nanoparticleexposureatnanotechnologyworkplacesareview AT fissanheinz nanoparticleexposureatnanotechnologyworkplacesareview AT gohlerdaniel nanoparticleexposureatnanotechnologyworkplacesareview AT stintzmichael nanoparticleexposureatnanotechnologyworkplacesareview |